UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

____________________

SCHEDULE 14A


____________________

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Filed by the Registrant [X] Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Filed by the Registrant

S

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

£

Check the appropriate Box:

[ ]    Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]    Confidential for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]    Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ]    Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

£

Preliminary Proxy Statement

£

Confidential for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

S

Definitive Proxy Statement

£

Definitive Additional Materials

£

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

HomeStreet, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(l) and 0-11.
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

S

No fee required.

£

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(l) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

    
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

    
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(Set forth the amount on which the filing is calculated and state how it was determined):

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing is calculated and state how it was determined):

    
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

    
5) Total Fee Paid:

(5)

Total Fee Paid:

    
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1) Amount Previously Paid:

£

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

£

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

    
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

    
3) Filing Party:

(3)

Filing Party:

    
4) Date Filed:

(4)

Date Filed:

    








April 22, 2016

21, 2021

It is myour distinct pleasure to invite you to attend the 20162021 annual meeting of shareholders of HomeStreet, Inc. The meeting(including any adjournments or postponements thereof, the “Annual Meeting”). We will be held at 10 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on May 26, 2016holding the meeting as a virtual meeting conducted online via a live webcast again this year. You will be able to attend the meeting, submit your questions and comments during the meeting, and vote your shares at the downtown Seattle Hilton Hotel, Windward Room, located at 1301 Sixth Avenue. A map and directionsmeeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021. You will also be able to access, through the website during the meeting, location can be found ata list of shareholders entitled to vote. We have been advised that Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge browsers will give the back ofbest user experience for participation in the attached proxy statement.

virtual meeting.

With this letter, we are including the notice for the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, the proxy statement, our annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and a proxy card.card and our 2020 annual report. You may also findfind copies of these items online at www.homestreet.com/proxy.

We are submitting for your approval three proposals:http://ir.homestreet.com/sec-filings/proxy-materials/default.aspx.

The matters to be voted on are: (1) the election of three Class IIsix directors, ratification(2) the approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the selectioncompensation of HomeStreet’s named executive officers, and (3) the ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of our independent auditors for 2016 and a shareholder proposal asking for the Company to adopt majority voting in non-contested director elections. The2021. Our Board of Directors believes each of the proposals are in the best interests of HomeStreet and its shareholders and accordingly recommends that you vote “FOR”in accordance with the Board’s recommendations on each of thethese proposals, set forthas described in the enclosed Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting, using the enclosed proxy statement.

card.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting through the virtual meeting website, we hope you will vote as soon as possible so that your shares are represented. Please vote following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card to vote by Internet or telephone or by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and promptly mailing it in the enclosed, postage pre-paid envelope provided. Providing voting instructions or returning your proxy card in advance of the meeting will not prevent you from voting on the website during the meeting but will ensure that your vote is counted if you are unable to attend.

If you would like to receive electronic notificationnotification of documents we filefile with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our issuance of press releases, you may subscribe to our e-maile-mail alerts at http://ir.homestreet.com.

Thank you for your ongoing support of and continued interest in HomeStreet, Inc.

Sincerely,

Mark K. Mason

Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

Donald R. Voss

Lead Independent Director

Your

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be held on May 27, 2021

The 2021 annual meeting of shareholders (including any adjournments or postponements thereof, the “Annual Meeting”) of HomeStreet, Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company”), will be held as a virtual only meeting at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on May 27, 2021, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021. We have been advised that Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge browsers will give the best user experience for participation in the virtual meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to consider and vote upon the following matters:

1.      The election of six directors to serve until the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, or until their respective successors are elected and qualified;

2.      The approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and

3.      The ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. We also will transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, but we are not aware of any such additional matters.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 9, 2021, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. You will need to use the control number provided on your proxy card to access the meeting, which will also allow you to vote your shares associated with that control number online during the Annual Meeting.

It is important.important that your voice be heard and your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting whether or not you are able to attend our virtual meeting through the website. We ask you to submit your vote by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card to vote by the Internet or telephone, or by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and promptly mailing it in the enclosed, postage pre-paid envelope provided. Please submit a proxy as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. Please refer to the questions and answers section commencing on page 5 of the attached Proxy Statement and the instructions on the proxy card.

Godfrey B. Evans

Executive Vice President, General Counsel,
Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary

April 21, 2021

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY27, 2021: THE PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING AND THE ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER31, 2020 ARE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE ON OUR WEBSITE AT IR.HOMESTREET.COM.

The notice of annual meeting of shareholders, the attached proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about April 21, 2021.

____________________________

PROXY STATEMENT

____________________________

Page

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

1

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

5

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

10

Introduction

10

The Board of Directors

10

Nominees for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting

11

Directors Continuing in Office

13

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

15

2020 Shareholder Outreach

15

Ongoing Shareholder Engagement

16

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

17

Code of Ethics

17

Whistleblower Policy

17

Principles of Corporate Governance

18

Director Independence

18

Board Diversity

18

Board Assessment, Refreshment and Orientation Process

18

Board Leadership Structure

19

Board Role in Risk Oversight

20

Leadership Response to COVID-19 Pandemic

21

Information Security Risks

23

Employee Compensation Risks

23

Board Meetings and Committees

23

Executive Committee

24

Audit Committee

24

Enterprise Risk Management Committee

25

Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee

26

Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders by the Board of Directors

29

Insider Trading Policy and Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

29

Contacting the Board of Directors

29

Director Compensation

29

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

32

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

35

Introduction

35

Executive Summary

35

Summary of Executive Compensation Practices

38

Compensation Philosophy and Practices

38

Elements of the Executive Compensation Program

38

Total Direct Compensation

39

The Decision-Making Process

41

i

Page

2020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

43

Base Salary

43

Annual Cash Incentives

43

Commissioned NEOs Incentive Plan Arrangements

47

Long-Term Incentives

48

OTHER PRACTICES, POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

51

Clawback Provisions

51

Hedging Policy

51

Health and Welfare Benefits

51

401(k) Savings Plan

51

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

51

Risk Assessment

51

Tax Considerations

52

Executive Employment Agreements

52

HUMAN RESOURCES AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

55

2020 Summary Compensation Table

56

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

60

Employment Agreements

60

Severance and Change in Control Agreement

61

2014 Plan

61

2014 Plan Award Agreements

61

PROPOSAL 2 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

65

Overview

65

Vote Required and Board Recommendation

65

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

66

PROPOSAL 3 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

67

Overview

67

Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

67

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

67

Engagement of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

68

Vote Required and Board Recommendation

68

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

69

Loans

69

Indemnification Agreements

70

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

70

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

71

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

72

OTHER MATTERS

73

Participants in the Solicitation

73

Costs of Solicitation

73

Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

73

Appraisal Rights

73

Shareholder List

73

Shareholders Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2022 Annual Meeting

74

Availability of the Form 10-K and Other Filings

74

Forward-Looking Statements

75

APPENDIX A

A-1

ii

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all the information that you should consider in connection with the matters before the Annual Meeting. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting your shares.

THE ANNUAL MEETING

Date

May 27, 2021

Time

10:00 a.m. Pacific Time

Place

The Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual-only meeting, which can be accessed at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021 by holders of our stock who have received a control number on their proxy card.

Record Date

April 9, 2021

Voting

Shareholders at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date for the Annual Meeting, 21,354,799.6 shares of our common stock were issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held. For more information on voting, attending the Annual Meeting and other meeting information, please see “Information about the Annual Meeting” on page 5 of this Proxy Statement.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible so that your shares are represented. We urgeinvite you to complete, signvote by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card to vote by the Internet or telephone, or by completing, signing and date yourdating the enclosed proxy card and promptly returnmailing it in the postage-paidenclosed, postage pre-paid envelope providedprovided. Providing voting instructions or vote using the internet or telephone. Returningreturning your proxy card in advance of the meeting will not prevent you from voting in person,on the website during the meeting but will ensure that your vote is counted if you are unable to attend.

The notice of the Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and enclosed proxy card are being mailed to shareholders on or about April 21, 2021.

AGENDA AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

Unanimous Board Recommendation

See Page

Proposal 1: Election of six directors

FOR
the Board’s nominees

10

Proposal 2: Approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

FOR

65

Proposal 3: Ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020

FOR

67

1

Thank you

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Our Board is currently comprised of nine directors, and we are in the second year of a three year process of phasing out our director classes, meaning that the nominees this year will again be elected for your ongoing supporta one-year term, while the remaining directors in office, who were elected in 2019, will continue to fill their current three-year terms until the 2022 annual meeting of the shareholders, until their respective successors are duly elected and continued interestqualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. You are therefore being asked to elect six directors this year to serve on the Board until the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. For more information about the background and qualifications of the director nominees and the entire Board of Directors, please see “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” on page 10 of this Proxy Statement. The Board’s nominees are:

Name

Age

Tenure

Committees

Scott Boggs

66

9 years

Audit Chair, Enterprise Risk Management, Executive

Jeffrey D. Green

57

<1 year

Audit, Human Resources and Corporate Governance

James R. Mitchell, Jr.

71

1 year

Audit, Human Resources and Corporate Governance

Mark R. Patterson

54

3 years

Enterprise Risk Management, Executive

Nancy D. Pellegrino

64

1 year

Enterprise Risk Management, Human Resources and Corporate Governance

Douglas I. Smith

57

9 years

Human Resources and Corporate Governance Chair, Audit

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

ü      Lead Independent Director with clearly defined responsibilities

ü      Eight of nine directors are independent

ü      Each Board committee, other than the Executive Committee, is comprised of independent directors

ü      Average director tenure is five years

ü      Average age of continuing directors is 63

ü      Board diversity policy

ü      Continuing Board refreshment, with one new director appointed since 2020 annual shareholders meeting

ü      Directors can be removed without “cause”

ü      Shareholders with at least 10% of outstanding shares are permitted to call a special meeting of shareholders

ü      Majority voting standard for uncontested director elections with a director resignation policy

ü      No supermajority shareholder vote requirements in HomeStreet, Inc.


Mark K. Mason
Chairmanthe Articles of Incorporation

ü      Phased-out declassification of the Board Presidentwill be completed at the next annual meeting, providing for the annual election of directors

ü      Board policy limits director membership on other public company boards

ü      Regular Board, committee and CEOdirector evaluations

ü      Regular comprehensive succession planning for management

ü      Each director attended 75% or more of all Board meetings in 2020

ü      Policies prohibiting hedging and pledging

ü      Meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines for directors

2








SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT OVERVIEW

The Board welcomes feedback from shareholders on our Board composition, governance practices and policies, executive compensation framework and other matters related to our strategy and performance. Members of our management team regularly attend industry and investor conferences where they primarily meet with active fund managers who are current investors or potential investors in HomeStreet, supplemented with regular outreach to large shareholders who are managers of index funds and other passive funds. In the summer and fall of each year, we reach out directly to our shareholders to solicit this feedback. As part of this program, in 2020 we contacted shareholders holding 40% of our shares offering direct engagement with management and, if desired, independent members of the Board. During 2020’s outreach, only one investor asked for a meeting with management, with many others declining and stating that they are happy with our strategic, financial, and governance progress. Management uses this ongoing dialogue to keep the Board informed about shareholder concerns, which in turn helps us address the issues that matter most to our shareholders. We encourage you to visit our investor relations website at ir.homestreet.com to learn more about the Company and to reach out to directly to the Board at corporatesecretary@homestreet.com to share your thoughts on the Company.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

2020 Executive Compensation

•        Average base salary increase for the top five NEOs who served all of 2020 was 6.6%

•        Corporate component of the Annual Incentive Plan attained 137.2% of target performance, which resulted in an above target payout for that component of the incentive plan

•        Performance Share Units for the performance period 2018-2020 did not vest due to the company not achieving threshold performance

•        Offered to engage with and considered shareholder input in designing our executive pay programs

•        Used independent, external compensation consultant for advice in making compensation program decisions

•        Conducted annual risk assessment of incentive compensation programs

Summary of Executive Compensation Practices

What We Do

   

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be Held on May 26, 2016

What We Don’t Do

ü

Offer to engage with and consider shareholder input in designing our executive pay programs

   

û

No short-selling, hedging or pledging of Company’s securities permitted by our insider trading policy, which applies to directors, officers, employees and consultants

ü

Short-term incentives that are designed to be aligned with short-term objectives

û

No employment arrangements that provide for guaranteed salary increases or non-performance-based cash incentive awards for executive officers

ü

Long-term performance-based equity incentive awards that are designed to be aligned with long-term objectives and the creation of shareholder value

û

No supplemental executive retirement plans

ü

Substantial portion of compensation opportunity is at-risk

û

No “golden parachute” excise tax gross ups in employment agreements

ü

Our CEO's and other NEO’s annual equity awards vest over at least a three-year period

û

No repricing, buyout or exchange of underwater stock options

ü

Retain an independent, external compensation consultant

û

No excessive perquisites

3


The Annual Meeting

Summary of Executive Compensation Practices

What We Do

What We Don’t Do

ü

Clawback features are incorporated into the short-term annual cash incentive programs for all executive officers

û

No single trigger vesting of equity awards in the event of a change of control

ü

Use of multiple performance measures and caps on potential incentive payments

û

No excessive severance arrangements providing for payments exceeding 3 times base salary plus target/average/most recent bonus

ü

Minimum one-year vesting period required for 95% of share-based awards granted under our Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”)

û

No liberal change in control provisions in the 2014 Plan and executive employment agreements

ü

Annual risk assessment of incentive compensation programs

û

No dividends paid on unvested performance shares or units; dividend equivalents accrued on outstanding awards paid only at vesting, without interest

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of shareholdersproxies by the Board of Directors (the “Annual Meeting”“Board” or the “Board of Directors”) of HomeStreet, Inc., a Washington corporation, (the “Company”), will be heldfor use at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on May 26, 2016, inour 2021 annual meeting of shareholders (including any postponements or adjournments thereof, the Windward Room“Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statement, the accompanying Notice of the Hilton Hotel, 1301 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 in order to consider and vote upon the following proposals:

1.To elect three (3) Class II directors to serve until the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders, or until their successors are elected, and qualified;
2.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;
3.A proposal by a shareholder of the Company asking the Company to adopt majority voting in non-contested director elections; and
4.To transact such other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereto.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 21, 2016, are entitled to notice of the meeting and an opportunity to vote.
We are requesting that you provide the Board of Directors your vote prior to the meeting by completing and returningShareholders, the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible. Additionally, we hope that you can attendand our Annual Report for the meeting in person. If you submit your proxy and later wishfiscal year ended December 31, 2020 are first being mailed to change your vote you may do so, either by submitting a new proxy or by voting in person at the meeting. If you are unable to attend the meeting and vote in person, please submit a proxy as soon as possible, so that your shares can be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. Please submit your proxy by mail, or vote using the internet or telephone in accordance with the specific instructions set forth in the enclosed proxy card. Please refer to the questions and answers section commencing on page 2 of the attached proxy statement and the instructions on the corresponding proxy card.
Our Mailing Address:
HomeStreet, Inc.
601 Union Street, Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98101

Godfrey B. Evans
Executive Vice President, General Counsel,
Chief Administrative Officer
and Corporate Secretary
April 22, 2016



Table of Contents
DATE, TIME, PLACE AND PURPOSE OF HOMESTREET'S ANNUAL MEETING1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL MEETING2
Why am I receiving these materials?
2
Who is entitled to vote?
2
Who is a shareholder of record?
2
How many shares are entitled to vote at the meeting?
2
How many votes do I have?
2
What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
2
What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?
2
How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?
3
How long will each of the directors elected at the Annual Meeting continue to serve?
3
How do I vote?
3
You may vote by mail
3
You may vote in person at the meeting
3
You may vote on the Internet
3
You may vote by Telephone
3
What if my shares are held in street name?
3
What happens if I sign and return my proxy card, but don't mark my votes?
4
Can I revoke my proxy?
4
What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?
4
Is my vote confidential?
4
Who will count the votes?
4
Where can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?
5
What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?
5
What constitutes a “quorum”?
5
How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?
5
What percentage of outstanding shares do the directors and executive officers own?
5
Who is paying the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the notices of the Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and form of proxy and the solicitation of the proxies?
5
What is the deadline for submitting shareholder proposals for consideration at the Company's next annual meeting of the shareholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
5
Who can help answer any other questions I may have?
6
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
7
Introduction
7
Nominees for Directors
7
Board Recommendation
7
Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Nominees
8
Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.
8
Nominees for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting
8
Directors Continuing in Office
9



PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
12
General
12
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
12
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
12
Board Recommendation13
PROPOSAL 3 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR MAJORITY VOTING IN NON-
CONTESTED ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS
14
Introduction14
Proposal
14
Statement of Shareholder Regarding Proposal
14
Board Recommendation
14
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
16
Code of Ethics
16
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
16
Principles of Corporate Governance
16
Director Independence
16
Board Leadership Structure
17
Board Role in Risk Oversight
17
Employee Compensation Risks
17
Board Meetings and Committees
17
Committee Membership of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.
18
Audit Committee
18
Enterprise Risk Management Committee
19
Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee
19
Interaction with Consultants
20
Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
21
Process for Recommending Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors
21
Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders by the Board of Directors
22
Insider Trading Policy and Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
22
Contacting the Board of Directors
22
Director Compensation
22
Current Non-Employee Director Compensation
22
Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan
23
Compensation for Employee Directors
23
Director Compensation Table
23
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
25
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
28
Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy
28
Decision Making and Policy Making
28
Summary Components of Compensation
29
Base Salary
29
Short-Term Incentive Compensation
29



Incentive Plan Risk Management
31
Equity Incentive Compensation
32
Other Benefit Plans
32
401(k) Savings Plan
32
Executive Deferred Compensation
33
Health and Welfare Benefits
33
Perquisites and other Personal Benefits
33
Executive Employment Agreements
33
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
35
Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committees Report
35
Summary Compensation Table
36
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
37
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
38
Loan Transactions
38
Indemnification Agreements
38
Consulting Agreement with Affiliate of Mr. Chrisman38
Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions
38
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
39
INFORMATION REGARDING EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
42
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
43
OTHER MATTERS
44
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
44
DIRECTIONS AND PARKING INSTRUCTIONS TO HOMESTREET, INC. ANNUAL MEETING
45




HOMESTREET, INC.
601 Union Street, Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98101

PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be Held May 26, 2016

DATE, TIME, PLACE AND PURPOSE OF HOMESTREET’S ANNUAL MEETING

The 2016 annual meeting ofour shareholders of HomeStreet, Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company” or “HomeStreet”) will be held at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on May 26, 2016, in the Windward Room of the Hilton Hotel, 1301 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. References to the “Annual Meeting” in this Proxy Statement include any postponements or adjournments of such meeting. At the meeting, the Company’s shareholders will be asked to approve a proposal to elect three Class II nominees for the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) to serve until the annual shareholder meeting in 2019, to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016, and to vote on a shareholder proposal seeking a change in our charter documents to require a majority vote of all shares cast at a meeting to elect each director in any non-contested election of directors. This Proxy Statement is first being sent to the shareholders of the Companyrecord on or about April 21, 2016, and is accompanied by a proxy card that is being solicited by the Company for use at the Annual Meeting.
Unless otherwise specified, all ownership interests or voting power referenced herein, either in percentage terms or number of shares, in respect of the Company’s outstanding shares, have been calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as reflected in the beneficial ownership table shown in the “Principal Shareholders” section elsewhere2021. References in this Proxy Statement.Statement to “HomeStreet,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to HomeStreet, Inc.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY27, 2021: THE PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING AND THE ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER31, 2020 ARE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE ON OUR WEBSITE AT IR.HOMESTREET.COM.

4



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERSINFORMATION ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL MEETING

1.      Why am I receiving these materials?

Our Board has sent you this Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card to ask for your vote, as a shareholder of HomeStreet, on certain matters that will be voted on at the virtual-onlyAnnual Meeting. As a shareholder, of record, you are invited to attend and are entitled to and requested to vote on the proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement. The reasons for, and furtherFor more information in relation to, each of these proposals are described in more detailon the participants in the questions and answers and other materials that follow.

Board’s solicitation, please see “Participants in the Solicitation” on page 73 of this Proxy Statement.

2.      Who is entitled to vote?

All shareholders of record of HomeStreet common stock at the close of business on April 21, 20169, 2021 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Who is a shareholder of record?
A shareholder of record is a person or entity whose name appears on or in our records as an owner of one or more shares of our common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.

3.      How many shares are entitled to vote at the meeting?

As of the Record Date, 24,556,153.621,354,799.6 shares of our common stock were issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

4.      How many votes do I have?

Each share of common sharestock you owned of record on the Record Date is entitled to one vote for each director candidate. You may NOT cumulate votes relating to the election of directors. For the other proposalsmatters presented at this meeting, you are entitled to one vote for each share of common sharestock you owned of record on the Record Date.

What proposals will be voted on at

5.      Who is a registered shareholder and who is a beneficial shareholder?

         Registered Shareholders:    A “registered shareholder” is a person or entity whose name appears in the Annual Meeting?

The proposals scheduledCompany’s registered list of shareholders as an owner of one or more shares of the Company’s common stock. If you are a registered shareholder, these proxy materials are being sent directly to be voted on atyou and you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting are:
The electionthrough the website for the meeting using the control number provided on your proxy card or voting instructions.

         Beneficial Shareholders:    A “beneficial shareholder” is a person or entity whose shares of the three Class II directors listedCompany’s common stock are held by a bank, broker or other nominee (a.k.a. in this Proxy Statement“street name”). Most holders of our common stock hold their shares beneficially through a bank, broker or other nominee rather than of record directly in their own name. If you are a beneficial shareholder, these proxy materials are being forwarded to serve for a termyou by your bank, broker or other nominee who is considered the registered shareholder of three yearsthose shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank, broker or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

The ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as HomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and
A shareholder proposal seeking a change in our articles of incorporation and bylawsother nominee on how to establish a majority voting standard in non-contested director elections.
What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?

ProposalVote RequiredBroker Discretionary
Voting Allowed
Proposal 1: Election of DirectorsPlurality of votes castNo
Proposal 2: Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm
Number of votes cast in favor exceed number of votes cast against

Yes
Proposal 3: Shareholder proposal seeking majority voting in non-contested director electionsNumber of votes cast in favor exceed number of votes cast againstNo


How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?
Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:
“FOR” the three director nominees;
“FOR” the ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as HomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;shares and
“FOR” the shareholder proposal seeking majority voting for non-contested director elections.
How long will each of the directors elected at you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting continue to serve?
Our Articles of Incorporation provide that our directors will serve a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. Our Board is divided into three classes of directors, with each class serving a three-year term. Typically at each annual meeting, our shareholders elect directors within one class, and each class is staggered in a manner that causes approximately one-third of our total number of directors to be elected annually, an arrangement commonly known as a staggered board. However, our Articles of Incorporation also provide that ifthrough the number of directors is changed, the classes shall be apportioned among the groups so as to maintain the number of directors in each group as nearly equal as possible. In addition, if a new director is appointed to the Board by the directors, that individual must standwebsite for election by the shareholders at our next annual meeting. The three director nominees for Class II will, if elected, serve until the 2019 annual meeting.
How do I vote?
You can vote on matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting in one of four ways:
You may vote by mail.
You do this by marking, signing and dating the proxy card and mailing it in the enclosed, prepaid and addressed envelope or otherwise mailing it to us at our mailing address on the cover page of this Proxy Statement prior to the Annual Meeting. If you mark your voting instructions on the proxy card, your shares will be voted as you instruct.
You may vote in person at the meeting.
You can vote in person at the meeting. However, if you hold your shares in street name (in the name of a bank or some other nominee), you must request and receive a legal proxy from the record owner prior to the meeting in order to vote atusing the meeting.
In order to facilitate an orderly Annual Meeting, we request that you provide the Board your vote prior to the Annual Meeting by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible.
You may votecontrol number provided on the Internet.
Go to www.voteproxy.com and follow the instructions. You should have your proxy card including your control number, in hand when you access the website.
You may vote by Telephone.
Call the toll-free number listed on the proxy card from any touch-tone telephone and follow theor voting instructions. You should have your proxy card, including your control number, in hand when you call.
If you own your shares through a brokerage accountYour bank, broker or in other nominee has enclosed a voting instruction form for you should follow the instructions you receive from the record holder with regard to which voting methods are available.
What if my shares are helduse in street name?
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held by a broker in street name, your broker, as the record holder of the shares, is requireddirecting how to vote the shares in accordance with your instructions.shares.

Under certain circumstances banks, brokers and brokersother nominees are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting



instructions to the bank, broker or broker,other nominee, which is referred to as a “broker non-vote.non-vote. In these cases, those shares will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. Pursuant to applicable regulations, if you do not give instructions to your broker or other nominee, your broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your shares with respect to Proposal 1, Election of Directors, or Proposal 3, Shareholder Proposal2, Approval on an Advisory (Non-Binding) Basis of the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers.

6.      What is a proxy?

         A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or a proxy card. We have designated Godfrey B. Evans, our Corporate Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer, and Mark K. Mason, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, as the Company’s proxies for Majority Votingthe Annual Meeting.

5

7.      How do I vote?

         Registered Shareholders:    If you are a “registered shareholder,” you can vote your shares in the following four ways:

•        By Internet:    You may vote by submitting a proxy over the Internet. Go to www.voteproxy.com and follow the instructions. You should have your proxy card, including your control number, in hand when you access the website.

•        By Telephone:    Shareholders located in the United States that receive proxy materials by mail may vote by submitting a proxy by telephone by calling the toll-free telephone number on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form and following the instructions.

•        By Mail:    If you received proxy materials by mail, you can vote by submitting a proxy by mail by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and mailing it in the enclosed, postage pre-paid envelope.

•        At the Annual Meeting:    If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting through the website provided using the control number from your proxy card or voting instructions, you may vote your shares associated with that control number online during the Annual Meeting. However, you are encouraged to complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and mail it in the enclosed postage pre-paid envelope regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting to ensure your vote is counted.

         Beneficial Shareholders:    If you are a “beneficial shareholder,” then you will receive voting instructions from your bank, broker or other nominee on how you may vote your shares, which will include a control number that you can use to access the Annual Meeting on the website www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HSMT2021.

         For more information, please see “Information about the Annual Meeting — How do I attend and participate in the Annual Meeting” on page 7 of this Proxy Statement.

8.      What should I do if I receive more than one proxy card or set of proxy materials from the Company?

         Your shares may be owned through more than one brokerage or other share ownership account. In order to vote all of the shares that you own, you must either sign and return all of the proxy cards or follow the instructions for Directorsany alternative voting procedure on each of the proxy cards that you receive.

         Please note that if you have more than one account through which you hold shares, you will receive more than one control number. The control number is used to vote your shares, and is also used to log on to the virtual meeting website to attend the meeting, which will allow you to vote the shares held in Non-Contested Elections, asthe account associated with that control number at the meeting. However, you will not be able to vote shares held in other accounts not associated with the control number you are using to log in to the virtual shareholder meeting. Therefore, it is important that you return your proxy cards for all of your accounts prior to the Annual Meeting so that all of your shares may be counted.

9.      Can I revoke my proxy?

         Yes. You can revoke your proxy and/or change your vote at any time prior to the Annual Meeting. Only your latest dated voting instructions or proxy will count.

         Registered Shareholders:    If you are a “registered shareholder” who has properly executed and delivered a proxy, you may revoke such proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting in any of the following ways:

•        submitting another proxy with a later date by telephone, by Internet or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card using the instructions on your proxy card;

•        sending a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101; or

•        voting online during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021.

6

         Beneficial Shareholders:    If you are a “beneficial shareholder,” you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your nominee in accordance with such nominee’s procedures. You can use your control number to log into the virtual Annual Meeting and change your vote during the meeting.

10.    How will my shares be voted if I return the proxy card?

         The shares represented by any proxy card that is properly executed and received by the Company prior to or at the Annual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the specifications made on that proxy card. Where a choice has been specified on the proxy card with respect to the proposals, the shares represented by the proxy card will be voted in accordance with the specifications.

         The Board is not aware of any matters that are expected to come before the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement.

If your shares are held in street name, you will need proof of ownership toany other matter should be admitted to the Annual Meeting. A recent brokerage statement or a letter from the record holder of your shares is an example of proof of ownership. If you want to vote your shares of common stock held in street name in personpresented at the Annual Meeting youupon which a vote may be properly taken, shares represented by the proxy cards received by the Board will have to get a writtenbe voted with respect thereto at the discretion of the person or persons named as proxies in the enclosed proxy in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.
card.

11.    What happens if I sign and return my proxy card, but don’t mark my votes?

         If you return a validly executed proxy card without indicating how your shares should be voted on a matter and you do not revoke your proxy, your proxy will be voted: “FOR” the election of the six director nominees of the Board set forth on the proxy card (Proposal 1); “FOR” the approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the Proxy Statement under “Executive Compensation” (Proposal 2); and “FOR” the ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2021 (Proposal 3).

12.    Will my shares be voted if I do nothing?

         If your shares are registered in your name, you must sign and return a proxy card in order for your shares to be voted, unless you vote via telephone or the Internet or vote online during the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, held for your account by a broker, bank or other nominee) and you do not instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote your shares, your bank, broker or other nominee may not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on with respect to the election of directors (Proposal 1) or the approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 2). If you do not markinstruct your vote on your proxy, Scott Boggs, Lead Independent Director, and Godfrey B. Evans, our Corporate Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer, willbroker or other nominee as to how to vote your shares as recommended by the Board: FOR eachand your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting authority, these unvoted shares will be “broker non-votes”. Brokers generally may only exercise discretionary voting authority to vote “routine” proposals. The ratification on an advisory (non-binding basis) of the director nominees identified herein, FOR the ratificationappointment of our independent auditorsregistered public accounting firm (Proposal 3) is the only routine proposal to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If nominees exercise this discretionary voting authority on Proposal 3, such shares will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for determining whether a quorum is present.

         YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.    To assure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting, we ask you to vote by using the Internet or telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card or completing, signing and FORdating the shareholder proposal for majority voting for directorsenclosed proxy card and promptly mailing it in non-contested elections.

Can I revoke my proxy?
the postage-paid envelope provided, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting through the website. You have the power tocan revoke your proxy at any time before the polls close atproxy or proxies you appointed cast your votes.

13.    How do I attend and participate in the Annual Meeting. You may do this by either:

a.submitting another proxy with a later date prior to the date of the Annual Meeting, over the internet, by telephone or to our Corporate Secretary, Godfrey B. Evans, at our mailing address on the cover page of this Proxy Statement, or
b.sending a written notice of your revocation to our Corporate Secretary at our mailing address on the cover page of this Proxy Statement, or
c.voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
What happens if additional matters are presentedMeeting?

         The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting?

If any other matters are properly presented for considerationmeeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another9:45 a.m. Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time or place (including, without limitation, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies),check-in procedures.

         Only HomeStreet shareholders or their duly authorized and constituted proxies may attend the persons named as proxy holders, Scott Boggs and Godfrey B. Evans, will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters will be raised at thevirtual-only Annual Meeting.

Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify an individual shareholder are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties, except: (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation. If you provide written comments The control number printed on your proxy card such comments mayor voting instructions is required to access the meeting through the website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021 regardless of whether you are a registered shareholder or a beneficial shareholder. We have been advised that Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge browsers will give the best user experience for participation in the virtual meeting.

7

         Our Chairman and CEO is expected to lead the meeting, and members of our Board of Directors, including the Lead Independent Director, are expected to be forwarded topresent and available during the Company’s management, however, there can be no guarantee that such commentsvirtual meeting. During the Annual Meeting, you will be forwarded or reviewed. We encourage anyable to hear the business of the meeting as it is conducted, vote your shares if you have not already done so, access information that would normally be available at an in-person annual meeting, including the list of shareholders who would likeentitled to provide comments to management to contact us directlyvote at the address provided onmeeting, and submit questions to be answered by our management, Chairman of the cover page of this Proxy Statement.

WhoBoard or Lead Independent Director. Questions pertinent to meeting matters will countbe answered during the votes?
American Stock Transfermeeting, subject to time constraints, and Trust Company, LLC, our stock transfer agent will serve asadditional instructions regarding the inspector of electionsquestion and in that capacity will count and tabulate the votes.


Where can I find the resultsanswer period of the Annual Meeting?
We intendMeeting will be posted on the virtual meeting website.

         The virtual Annual Meeting has been designed to announce preliminary voting resultsprovide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. Shareholders participating in the virtual meeting will be in a listen-only mode and will not be able to speak during the webcast. However, in order to maintain the interactive nature of the virtual meeting, virtual attendees are able submit questions before and during the meeting through the virtual meeting portal. To submit a question, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” Questions and answers may be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions may be grouped and answered once. In order to promote fairness and efficient use of time, we will respond to up to two questions from a single shareholder and may not be able to respond to all questions at the Annual Meeting andvirtual meeting.

         Our virtual meeting website will publish final results in a Current Reportbe hosted by Broadridge. In the event you have any technical difficulties logging into the meeting, support from Broadridge will be available. For more information, please go to the virtual meeting website, where you will be able to find additional information on Form 8-K, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four (4) business days after the Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?
It means that your shares may be owned through more than one brokerage or other share ownership account. Please mark, sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all your shares are voted.
technical support matters.

14.    What constitutes a “quorum”?

A “quorum” refers to the number of shares that must be represented at a meeting in order to lawfully conduct business.

         A majority of the outstanding shares of common sharesstock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person as a logged-in participant of the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Votes withheld, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present or represented for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Without a quorum, no business may be transacted at the Annual Meeting. However, whether or notIf less than a quorum exists,of the outstanding shares is represented at the Annual Meeting, a majority of the voting power of those present at the Annual Meetingshares so represented may adjourn the Annual Meeting without further notice.

15.    What vote is required to another date, time and place.

How areapprove each of the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

Proposal

Vote Required

Broker
Discretionary
Voting

Proposal 1: Election of six directors

Majority of votes cast*

No

Proposal 2: Approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

Number of votes cast in favor exceeds number of votes cast against

No

Proposal 3: Ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of our independent auditors for 2021

Number of votes cast in favor exceeds number of votes cast against

Yes

____________

*        Under the Bylaws, the voting standard in an uncontested election is a majority vote standard. See “What vote is required to elect directors?” below.

16.    What is the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

non-votes?

         If you specify that you wish to “abstain” from voting on an item (or “withhold” your vote for a director), then your shares will not be voted on that particular item. Abstentions and broker non-votes will benon-votes are not considered “votes cast” and so are not counted foreither “for” or “against” any proposal that requires a majority of votes cast in order to pass, which includes all of the purposeproposals being presented at the annual meeting (including the non-contested election of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. At present, thedirectors).

8

17.    What vote is required to elect directors?

         Our Bylaws provide that, in any election of directors requires that is not a “contested election” (as defined in our Bylaws and described below), the candidates elected receiveare those receiving a pluralitymajority of the votes which means thatcast. Therefore, to be elected, the three candidates receiving the largest number of votes cast “FOR” a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that nominee.

         The term of any director nominee who is a director at the time of election and who does not receive a majority of votes cast in the election held under the majority voting standard described above terminates on the earliest to occur of: (i) 90 days after the date on which the voting results of the election are determined; (ii) the date the director’s resignation is accepted by the Board; or (iii) the date the Board fills the position. The following will not be votes cast and will have no effect on the election of any director nominee: (i) a share whose ballot is marked as “withheld”; (ii) a share otherwise present at the meeting but for which there is an abstention; and (iii) a share otherwise present at the Class II director positionsmeeting as to which a shareholder gives no authority or direction (other than a share voted pursuant to a signed proxy card on which the shareholder has not indicated any voting direction). Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. Shareholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of directors.

         Our Bylaws provide that an election is considered “contested,” and will be elected. Becauseheld under a plurality standard, if (a) the Secretary of the Company receives a notice that a shareholder has nominated a person for election to the Board in compliance with the advance notice requirements for shareholder nominees set forth in Section 1.13 of our Bylaws who are not withdrawn by the advance notice deadline set forth in that section and (b) the Board has not determined before the notice of meeting is given that the shareholder’s nominee(s) do not create a bona fide election contest. No such shareholder notice was received by the Company in advance of this year’s annual meeting.

18.    What vote is required to approve each of the other proposals –proposal submitted on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the approvalcompensation of the ratificationCompany’s named executive officers and the ratification of the selectionappointment of the Company’s independent registered public accountants?

         Each of the proposals to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, LLP as ourHomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firmfirm for the fiscal year endedending December 31, 2016 and the approval2021 will be adopted if a majority of a shareholder proposal to require majority voting in non-contested director elections – requires that the votes present in person or by proxy and voting on such matter are cast in favor of such action exceed“for” the votes cast against such action, assumingproposal. You may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” from approving the presence of a quorum, abstentionsproposal. Abstentions and broker non-votesnon-votes will not affecthave no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

19.    Who will count the votes?

         Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will serve as the independent inspector of election and, in such capacity, will count and tabulate the votes.

20.    Where can I find the results of the mattersAnnual Meeting?

         We intend to be consideredannounce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting.

What percentage of outstanding shares do the directorsMeeting and executive officers own?
Together these persons had or shared the rightintend to vote or dispose of approximately 7.59% of our common stock as of the Record Date.
Who is paying the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the notices of the Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and form of proxy and the solicitation of the proxies?
The Company is paying all such costs. We may reimburse brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries and other persons representing beneficial owners for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person or by other means of communication. Such directors, officers and employees will not be additionally compensated but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.
What is the deadline for submitting shareholder proposals for consideration at the Company’s next annual meeting of the shareholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
For inclusion in HomeStreet’s proxy materials: Shareholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in HomeStreet’s Proxy Statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of shareholders by submitting such proposals in writing to our Corporate Secretarypublish final results in a timely manner. In order to be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholder proposals must be received by HomeStreet’s Corporate Secretary no later than December 23, 2016, and must otherwise complyCurrent Report on Form 8-K, which we will file with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of theSecurities and Exchange Act and of HomeStreet’s bylaws.
To be brought before an annual meeting: In addition, our bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for shareholders who wish to present certain matters before an annual meeting of shareholders.


In general, nominations for the election of directors may be made (1) by or at the direction of the Board, or (2) by a shareholder who has delivered written notice to HomeStreet’s Corporate SecretaryCommission (the “SEC”) within the Notice Period (as defined below) and who was a shareholder at the time of such notice and as of the Record Date. The notice must contain specified information about the nominees and about the shareholder proposing such nominations.
Our bylaws also provide that the onlyfour business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (1) specified in the notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board, (2) properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or (3) properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder who has delivered written notice to our Corporate Secretary within the Notice Period (as defined below) and who was a shareholder at the time of such notice and as of the Record Date. The notice must contain specified information about the matters to be brought before such meeting and about the shareholder proposing such matters, including information related to the shareholder’s ownership interest in the Company and any material interests of the shareholder in the business desired to be brought before the meeting.
The “Notice Period” is defined as that period not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the one year anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting date. As a result, the Notice Period for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders will start on January 26, 2017 and end on February 25, 2017. However, if the annual meeting for 2017 is more than 30 days before or 60 days after May 26, 2017, in order to be timely notice must be delivered not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the actual date of the 2017 meeting; provided, that if the notice of such meeting is less than 100 days before the date of such meeting, notice of such proposal must be made not less than 10 days after the date of the notice of the meeting in order to be timely.
If a shareholder who has notified the Company of his or her intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his or her proposal at such meeting, the Company need not present the proposal for vote at such meeting.
A copy of the full text of the bylaw provisions discussed above may be obtained by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by accessing our filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. All notices of proposals by shareholders, whether or not included in our proxy materials, should be sent to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.
Annual Meeting.

21.    Who can help answer any other questions I may have?

Please contact our investor relations department by calling 206-264-4200, by writing to

         If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, or if you need additional copies of the proxy materials, please contact:

HomeStreet, Inc., attn.:

Attn: Investor Relations

601 Union Street, Suite 2000

Seattle, WashingtonWA 98101 or by electronic mail at ir@homestreet.com

9





PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Introduction

HomeStreet’s Board consists of nine members. At the 2019 annual meeting, our shareholders approved an amendment to our charter documents that phases out the classification of our Board over three years, a process we began in 2020. In prior years, our Board was divided into three classes and approximately one-third of each of our directors were elected each year to serve for three-year terms, until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. Beginning with last year’s Annual Meeting, directors are now elected to one-year terms, such that two-thirds of the continuing Board will be elected at this Annual Meeting, including two directors who last stood for election in 2020, and all directors will stand for election at the 2022 annual meeting. Each director holds office until that director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death or resignation. Our bylawsdirectors are currently serving the following terms:

•        Jeffrey D. Green was appointed to fill a vacancy in the Board of Directors created by an expansion of the Board of Directors since the last annual meeting of the shareholders and is serving a term that will expire at the Annual Meeting.

•        James R. Mitchell, Jr. and Nancy D. Pellegrino were elected to the Board of Directors at the last annual meeting of the shareholders and are serving a one-year term that will expire at the Annual Meeting.

•        Scott M. Boggs, Mark R. Patterson and Douglas I. Smith were elected in 2018 and are serving a three-year term that will expire at the Annual Meeting.

•        Sandra A. Cavanaugh, Mark K. Mason and Donald R. Voss were elected in 2019 and are serving a three-year term that will expire at the annual meeting of the shareholders to be held in 2022.

The Board of Directors

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to HomeStreet’s Board of Directors, including each director’s age as of April 9, 2021.

Director

 

Age

 

Director Since

 

Term Expiration

Mark K. Mason, Chairman

 

61

 

2010

 

2022 Annual Meeting

Donald R. Voss, Lead Independent Director

 

70

 

2015

 

2022 Annual Meeting

Scott M. Boggs

 

66

 

2012

 

2021 Annual Meeting

Sandra A. Cavanaugh

 

66

 

2018

 

2022 Annual Meeting

Jeffrey D. Green(1)

 

57

 

2020

 

2021 Annual Meeting

James R. Mitchell, Jr.

 

71

 

2020

 

2021 Annual Meeting

Mark R. Patterson

 

54

 

2018

 

2021 Annual Meeting

Nancy D. Pellegrino

 

64

 

2019

 

2021 Annual Meeting

Douglas I. Smith

 

57

 

2012

 

2021 Annual Meeting

____________

(1)      Mr. Green was appointed to fill a newly created vacancy on the Board in June 2020. Pursuant to the Bylaws, the term of any director appointed to fill a newly created position runs until the next annual meeting of the shareholders.

Under our Bylaws, any director nominee’s eligibility to serve as a director of the Company is subject to any required notification to, or approval, nonobjection or requirement of, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions or any other regulatory entity having jurisdiction over the Company.

The number of directors may be increased or decreased from time to time by our Board, provided that a reduction in the number of directors may not shorten the term of an incumbent. Our Bylaws permit our Board of Directors to establish by resolution the authorized number of directors, which shall be between seven and 13 directors. The Board is currently composed of 10 members, however, Bruce W. Williams, one of our Class II directors, has chosen to retire from the Board as of the end of the Annual Meeting, therefore the Board of Directors has reduced the number of directors from 10 to nine effective upon the completion of Mr. William’s term and eliminated one Class II director position. Our Articles of Incorporation provide that directors are elected for three-year terms, with one-third of the Board elected at each annual meeting of shareholders. Each director holds office until that director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until his earlier death or resignation. Our directors are currently classified into the following three classes:

Class I directors are Scott M. Boggs, Douglas I. Smith and Timothy R. Chrisman and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of the shareholders to be held in 2018;
Class II directors are Mark K. Mason, Victor H. Indiek, Donald R. Voss and Bruce W. Williams, and their terms will expire at the Annual Meeting; and
Class III directors are David A. Ederer, Thomas E. King and George “Judd” Kirk and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of the shareholders to be held in 2017.
The three directors standing for election to our Board of Directors are all of our current Class II directors other than Bruce W. Williams. All nominees are incumbent directors of the Company.
Nominees for Director
Upon recommendation of the Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated Mark K. Mason, Victor H. Indiek and Donald R. Voss for re-election to the Board as Class II directors with a term set to expire at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2019. Biographical information about each of the nominees is contained in the following section.
A discussion of the qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee that led our Board of Directors and the Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee to the conclusion that he should continue to serve as a director has been added following each of the director and nominee biographies.
If you are a shareholder of record and you sign your proxy card but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted FOR the re-election of Messrs. Mason, Indiek and Voss. While we expect that all of the nominees will be able to qualify for and accept office, if for any reason a nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by the Board to fill such vacancy. If you wish to give specific instructions with respect to the voting of directors, you may do so by indicating your instructions on your proxy card. If you hold your shares in street name and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, your broker will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH
OF MARK K. MASON, VICTOR H. INDIEK AND DONALD R. VOSS.



Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Nominees

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc., including their ages as of April 22, 2016.

Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.

DirectorAgeDirector SinceClassTerm Expiration
Mark K. Mason, Chairman562010Class II2016 Annual Meeting
David A. Ederer, Chairman Emeritus732005Class III2017 Annual Meeting
Timothy R. Chrisman692014Class I2018 Annual Meeting
Scott M. Boggs, Lead Director622012Class I2018 Annual Meeting
Victor H. Indiek782012Class II2016 Annual Meeting
Thomas E. King722012Class III2017 Annual Meeting
George “Judd” Kirk702012Class III2017 Annual Meeting
Douglas I. Smith522012Class I2018 Annual Meeting
Donald R. Voss652015Class II2016 Annual Meeting
Bruce W. Williams621994Class II2016 Annual Meeting


HomeStreet, Inc.’s Board of Directors currently consists of 10 members, however, the number of directors has been reduced to nine by an action of the Board of Directors, to be effective upon Mr. Williams’s retirement from the Board as of the end of his term, which coincides with the Annual Meeting. In 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors met 12 times. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes and approximately one-third of our directors are elected each year to serve for a three year-term or until a successor is duly elected and qualified. Under our present bylaws, directors must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including any required approvals from our regulators.
The number of directors may be increased or decreased from time to time by our Board of Directors, provided that a reduction in the number of directors may not shorten the term of an incumbent. Newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors or any vacancies in the Board may be

10

filled solely by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, unless otherwise provided by law or by resolution of the Board. A majorityAll of our directors, except for Mr. Mason, satisfy the definition of “independent director” under the corporate governance rules of Nasdaq.

Key Qualifications

The following table sets forth certain key qualifications and skills of our Board. The lack of a mark for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualifications, characteristic, skill or experience. We look to each director to be knowledgeable in these areas; however, the mark indicates that the item is a particularly prominent qualification, characteristic, skill or experience that the director brings to our Board. Our Board composition reflects our Board’s desire that directors have the broad expertise and perspective needed to govern our business and strengthen and support senior management.

Mark Mason

Donald Voss

Scott Boggs

Sandra Cavanaugh

James Mitchell Jr.

Mark Patterson

Nancy Pellegrino

Douglas Smith

Jeffrey Green

Financial Expertise/Literacy

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Corporate Governance

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Public Company Board Experience

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Strategic Planning

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Legal

ü

ü

Capital Management

ü

ü

ü

ü

Technology/Cybersecurity

ü

ü

ü

Audit

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Human Capital Management

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Marketing

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Regulatory/Risk Management

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Business Development

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Business Operations

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Public Company Executive Experience

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Accounting

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Industry Experience

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Nominees for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting

Upon recommendation of the HRCG Committee, the Board has nominated Scott M. Boggs, Jeffrey D. Green, James R. Mitchell, Jr., Mark K. Mason, Director, Chairman, Chief Executive OfficerR. Patterson, Nancy D. Pellegrino and President of HomeStreet, Inc. Douglas I. Smith for re-election to the Board with a oneMr. Mason has been-year term set to expire at the Company’s Chief Executive Officernext annual meeting of shareholder, to be held in 2022. Biographical information about each of the nominees is contained in the following section. A discussion of the qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee that led our Board and the Bank’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since January 20, 2010 andHRCG Committee to the Chairman of the Company since March 26, 2015. From January 20, 2010 until March 25, 2015, Mr. Mason was the Vice Chairman of the Company’s Board. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Mason was president, chief executive officer and chief lending officer for Bank Plus Corporation and its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Fidelity Federal Bank, where Mr. Mason also served as the chief financial officer from 1994 to 1995 and as chairman of the board of directors from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Mason has also served as president of a startup energy company, TEFCO, LLC, andconclusion that she or he served on the boards of directors of Hanmi Financial Corp., San Diego Community Bank, and The Bjurman Barry Family of Mutual Funds. Mr. Mason is currently on the boards of directors of the Pacific Coast Banking School and Washington Bankers Association, and is an advisory board member of Seattle University’s Albers School of Business and Economics. Mr. Mason is a certified public accountant (inactive) and holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration with an emphasis in Accounting from California State Polytechnic University. Mr. Mason brings extensive business, managerial and leadership experience to our Board of Directors. Mr. Mason was selected toshould serve as a director becauseappears following each of his position as our Chief Executive Officer and his significant experience as an executive officer,the director and consultant to other banks and mortgage companies, his credit and lending experience, finance and accounting education and experience and relationships in the banking industry and the capital markets.



Victor H. Indiek, Director. Mr. Indiek joined the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc. and the Bank upon the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. He has been a project manager at Quantum Partners since 2007 where he manages FDIC receiverships, including the disposition of the assets of failed banks. He is currently a principal at Indiek Realty/Finance, which he formed in 1995. From 1999 to 2002 he served as a director and chairman of the audit committee of Bank Plus Corporation and Fidelity Federal Bank. Mr. Indiek was also involved in the formation of Freddie Mac, serving initially as its first chief financial officer from 1970 to 1973 and then as its president and chief executive officer from 1974 to 1977. He subsequently served as an executive officer at several financial institutions, including American Diversified Savings, American Savings/Financial Corporation of America and FarWest Savings, and as an audit manager for Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Indiek holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Kansas, is a certified public accountant (inactive) and a California real estate broker. Mr. Indiek was selected to serve as a director because of his extensive experience in the banking and mortgage banking industries and because of his accounting education and experience.
Donald R. Voss, Director. Mr. Voss was appointed as a member of the Board on March 1, 2015 in connection with the closing of our acquisition of Simplicity Bancorp in Southern California. He previously served as a director of Simplicity Bancorp beginning in 2011 and the chairman of the board and member of the audit committee of Simplicity Bancorp from October 2013 until the acquisition of that company by HomeStreet in March 2015.  Prior to joining Simplicity’s board, Mr. Voss held a variety of positions in a 25 year career with First Interstate Bank, culminating as an Executive Vice President and Manager of the U.S. Banking Division in 1991.  Much of his banking experience was with domestic and international financial institutions. He was an elected Councilmember of the City of La Cañada Flintridge, California from 2006 until March 2015 and served as Mayor of that city from 2010 to 2011. In 2015, Mr. Voss received the 2015 El Gran Matador Award from California Contract Cities Association and the Reynolds Memorial Award from that organization in 2012. He also received the Les Tupper Service Award from the La Cañada Flintridge Coordinating Council in April 2016 for outstanding service to his community and was named 2015 La Cañadan of the Year by the Kiwanis Club of La Cañada.  Prior to his election to the City Council in 2006, Mr. Voss served for five years as City Treasurer of La Cañada Flintridge. Mr. Voss served as a board member of the San Gabriel Valley Chapter of the American Red Cross, including three years as chairman of that board, and also served on the audit committee of that organization. He has also served on the boards of the Los Angeles Division of the League of California Cities, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, the Southern California Association of Governments, the California Contract Cities Association and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, as well as the advisory board of the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, an agency of the state of California. Mr. Voss holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Washington and a graduate degree in banking from Stonier Graduate School of Banking. He brings general business, financial, credit and risk management, treasury management, and governance skills, which are of importance to his service on our Board, audit committee and governance/nominating committee.
Directors Continuing in Office
nominee biographies.

Scott M. Boggs, Lead Independent Director. Director

Mr. Boggs joined theHomeStreet Bank in 2006 as a member of theits board of directors and became a director of HomeStreet, Inc. following the closing of our initial public offeringCompany in February 2012. Mr. Boggs was electedserved as the lead independent directorLead Independent Director of the Board infrom March 2015.2015 through June 2018. Prior to joining the Bank,HomeStreet Bank’s board of directors, Mr. Boggs was employed by Microsoft Corporation from 1993 to 2003 where he served in a variety of positions, including vice president, corporate controller from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Boggs was also an adjunct professor for the Seattle University Albers School of Business and Economics, teaching accounting and information systems from 2004 until 2009. Mr. Boggs previously served as a trustee and chair of the audit committee and budget and investments committee of the Financial Executives

11

Research Foundation from 2002 to 2008, as director, chair of the pension committee and a member of the audit committee and designated financial expert of the Cascade Natural Gas Corporation from 2004 to 2007, and director, vice chair of audit committee and designated financial expert of the Safeco family of mutual funds from 2002 to 2004. He is a former member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, and former member ofSeattle University Internal Audit Advisory Board, the King County Strategic Technology Advisory Council, the Seattle University Accounting Advisory Board and the Financial Executives International. Mr. Boggs started his career as a certified public accountant (currently inactive) with Deloitte, Haskins & Sells from 1977 to 1985, and he received his bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the University of Washington.

Mr. Boggs was selected to serve as a director because of his



significant accounting and financial experience, his accounting credentials and degree as well asand his experience as a designated financial expert on audit committees.

TimothyJeffrey D. Green, Director

Mr. Green was appointed as a member of the Board in June 2020 to fill a vacancy on the Board. Mr. Green retired as the Financial Institutions National Practice leader and audit and client service Partner of Moss Adams LLP, a national accounting, tax, and advisory firm in December 2018, having served with the firm since 1990. From 2015 to 2018, Mr. Green was Moss Adams’ Financial Institutions National Practice Leader, and in that role, was responsible for that firm’s national financial institutions practice, covering accounting, auditing, internal control, and strategic issues facing publicly traded bank reporting companies, community banks, thrifts, and mortgage banking companies. From 2007 to 2015 Mr. Green was the Managing Partner of Moss Adams’ Everett, Washington practice office. Over his 31-year career in public accounting, Mr. Green gained significant experience working with the boards and audit committees of publicly traded banking and lending institutions while managing major client relationships across multiple markets. In those roles, Mr. Green developed expertise in complex accounting, auditing, internal control, financial reporting, and regulatory compliance matters. He holds a Bachelor of Science in business administration with a focus in accounting from Washington State University and is a certified public accountant and member of the Washington State Society of Certified Public Accountants and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Mr. Green was selected to serve because of his background as an audit partner for companies in the financial institutions industry, expertise in commercial banking, professional qualifications, financial literacy and his qualification as an audit committee “financial expert”.

James R. Chrisman, Director. Mitchell, Jr. Director

Mr. ChrismanMitchell joined HomeStreetthe Board in January 2020. Mr. Mitchell has worked in commercial banking for more than 40 years, including founding Puget Sound Bank in 2004, where he served as president and chief executive officer from inception until the merger of that bank with Heritage Bank in January 2018. He was also a member of the Board of Directors of Puget Sound Bank from 2004 through January 2018, serving as chairman of the board from 2004 through 2008. After the merger of Puget Sound Bank and Heritage Bank, Mr. Mitchell served as the market president for King County for Heritage Bank for the next year, until January 2019, and then as a consultant to Heritage Bank until January 2020. Prior to founding Puget Sound Bank, Mr. Mitchell served as a Senior Vice President at Sterling Bank, where he opened and grew the Seattle corporate banking office, from 2002 to 2004, and a Senior Vice President and team leader for the Seattle corporate banking team of U.S. Bank from 1990 through 2002. Mr. Mitchell served on the Board of Directors of the Washington Bankers Association from 2011 to 2018, the Board of Directors of the Western Bankers Association from 2015 to 2018, and the board of Bellevue LifeSpring, a nonprofit organization, from 2009 to 2017. Mr. Mitchell received his bachelor’s degree from Seattle University, a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Washington and his juris doctorate from Southwestern University School of Law.

Mr. Mitchell was selected to serve as a director based on his knowledge of the banking industry, experience as a chief executive officer and director of a bank, and expertise in Julycommercial banking.

Mark R. Patterson, Director

Mr. Patterson joined the Board in January 2018. Mr. Patterson served as Managing Director and Equity Analyst of NWQ Investment Management Co., LLC, an investment management company (“NWQ”), from 1997 until his retirement in 2014. At NWQ, he conducted fundamental research and valuation analysis of public companies within the financial services sector. Mr. Chrisman is the founding partner of Chrisman & Company, a Los Angeles-based retained executive search firm focusing on financial and related industries. Prior to forming his own company, Mr. ChrismanPatterson was a senior executive with a $2 billion financial institution for 10 years, where he focused on retail delivery, marketing, human resources and general management. Mr. Chrisman was the Chairman of BANC of California, Inc., the holding company for Banc of California from May 2011 through 2014 and a director of WaterfieldFBR & Co. from 2015 until the company’s sale in 2017, serving on its audit and compensation committees. From 1989 to 1997, Mr. Patterson served in various capacities at U.S. Bancorp, including Vice President, Investor Relations, where he was a primary contact between the bank

12

holding company and the investment community. In that role he also performed detailed valuation and capital planning financial analysis that informed the company’s strategic direction. Prior to that position, Mr. Patterson served as a financial analyst in U.S. Bank’s Financial Consulting Division/Planning & Forecasting Department. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst and holds an MBA from The Anderson School at UCLA and a bachelor’s degree in business & mathematics from Linfield College. Mr. Patterson serves on the Board of Trustees of Linfield College, where he is a member of the financial affairs and executive committees and chair of the investment committee.

Mr. Patterson was selected to serve as a director due to his experience in banking operations, perspective as an investor in financial institutions and finance expertise.

Nancy D. Pellegrino, Director

Ms. Pellegrino joined the Board in October 2019. Ms. Pellegrino has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services, private banking, and wealth management industries. She served as a Managing Director and Regional CEO for Citi Private Bank from 2006July 2010 through 2010. He previouslyOctober 2013 and was at BNY Mellon Wealth Management from August 2000 through July 2010 where she served as Pacific Northwest President and Regional Director. She was also at Banc One Corp from June 1990 through June 2000, rising to the position of Senior Vice President and Regional Sales Director for the Midwest, prior to which she was a Vice President at Texas Commerce Bank Trust Company, which she joined in 1982. She also served on the Board of Commercial CapitalDirectors of Puget Sound Bank from September 2014 until January 2018. Since her retirement from Citi Private Bank in 2013, Ms. Pellegrino has been providing consulting services to individuals, teams and Commercial Capital Bancorp,organizations in the private banking, wealth management, social enterprise and was Chairmanfamily business industries, drawing on her expertise in those fields. She also serves on the boards of several nonprofit organizations, including the Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center Board of Ambassadors. Ms. Pellegrino received her bachelor’s degree from Vanderbilt University in Fine Arts and is a graduate of the Board from 2004 to 2005. He also was the former Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco for 10 years and the former Chairman of the Council of Federal Home Loan Banks. He currently serves as a Senior Advisor to the investment banking firm, FIG Partners LLC. Mr. Chrisman received both a bachelor’s of science in marketing and a masters in business administration from California StateNorthwestern University Fresno. Mr. ChrismanGraduate Trust School.

Ms. Pellegrino was selected to serve as a director because of hisher experience and expertise in the banking and financial services industry.

David A. Ederer, Director and Chairman Emeritus of the Board. Mr. Ederer joined the Bank in 2004 as a member of its board of directors and in 2005 also became a member of the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc. Mr. Ederer was elected chairman of that board in 2009 and took on the title of Chairman Emeritus in March 2015 when Mr. Mason assumed the role of Chairman. Since 1974 Mr. Ederer has served as the chairman of Ederer Investment Company, a private investment company, and he currently serves on the board of directors of the Prostate Cancer Foundation (formerly CaPCURE), PONCHO, CRISTA Ministries and the University of Washington Medical Institute for Prostate Cancer Research. Mr. Ederer has previously served as a director of a number of public and private companies, organizations and institutions, including Cascade Natural Gas, University Savings Bank, Farmers New World Life Insurance Company, Children’s Hospital and Seattle Pacific University. Mr. Ederer is a certified public accountant (inactive) and managed consulting, accounting and auditing services for Price Waterhouse from 1965 to 1974. Mr. Ederer received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Washington. Mr. Ederer was selected to serve as a director because of his experience as a director on public company boards, his experience on board committees, his financial expertise and his professional degrees and training in business and management.
Thomas E. King, Director. Mr. King joined the board of directors of the Bank in 2010 and became a director of HomeStreet, Inc. following the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. Prior to joining the Bank’s board, Mr. King served as president and chief executive officer, chief credit officer and director of San Diego Community Bank from 2001 to 2006. Since retiring from San Diego Community Bank following its sale to First Banks, Inc. in 2006, Mr. King has provided consulting services to banks and other financial services companies. Prior to joining San Diego Community Bank, he served as executive vice president and chief operating officer of Fullerton Community Bank from 1997 to 1998, president and chief executive officer and director of the Bank of Southern California from 1994 to 1996, and president, chief executive officer and director of Capitol Bank Sacramento from 1992 to 1994. From 1969 to 1992, Mr. King held various senior positions in commercial lending, real estate lending, credit administration, corporate and merchant banking and retail banking at Security Pacific National Bank. He received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from California State University, Northridge. Mr. King was chosen to serve as a director because of his experience as an executive officer, director and consultant to banks and financial services companies, his commercial banking relationships, his financial experience, commercial lending and credit administration experience and distressed institution turnaround experience.
George Judd” Kirk, Director. Mr. Kirk has served as a member of the board of directors of the Bank since 2008 and became a director of HomeStreet, Inc. following the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. From February 2012 until March 2015, Mr. Kirk served as Lead Independent Director of the Bank’s board of directors. Mr. Kirk served as president of Port Blakely Communities, Inc. from 1997 to 2007 and as its Chief Executive Officer from 2007 to 2008. Prior to joining Port Blakely Communities, he served as president of Skinner Development Company and until 1986, chaired the Real Estate Department of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in Seattle. Mr. Kirk is a past member of the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA). He has previously served as a member of the Urban Land Institute (CDC Council), American College of Real Estate Lawyers, and the Pacific


Real Estate Institute. He has also been a member of the boards of directors of several community organizations, including University of Washington Physicians and the Cascade Land Conservancy. Mr. Kirk has previously served as the chairman of the WSBA Real Property, Probate and Trust Section, President of the Issaquah Chamber of Commerce and President of the University of Washington Alumni Association. Mr. Kirk received a bachelor’s degree in Finance from the University of Washington, School of Business, and a law degree cum laude from Harvard Law School. Mr. Kirk was selected to serve as a director because of his business and management experience, his real estate development experience, his knowledge of real estate and real estate finance and his legal experience, as well as his civic and community service involvement.

Douglas I. Smith, Director. Director

Mr. Smith joined our Board of Directors upon the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. Mr. Smith is a director of and has worked for Miller and Smith Inc., a privately held residential land development and home building company in metropolitan Washington, D.C., since 1992, and has served as its president since 1998 and he2002. He is also the managing member of Miller and Smith LLC and Silent Tree LLC.Partners LLC, both of which invest in real estate development and management of those development projects. He has also been a board member of Home Aid Northern Virginia since 2001. Mr. Smith holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a bachelor’s degree in economics from DePauw University.

Mr. Smith has been electedwas selected to serve as a director because of his experience in the residential construction lending area as well as his experience in the home building and land development industries.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR

” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF SCOTT M. BOGGS, JEFFREY D. GREEN, JAMES R. MITCHELL, JR., MARK R. PATTERSON,
NANCY D. PELLEGRINO AND DOUGLAS I. SMITH.



PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
General
The Audit CommitteeDirectors Continuing in Office

Mark K. Mason, Director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

Mr. Mason has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP asbeen the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to auditChief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and a member of the consolidated financial statementsCompany’s Board and HomeStreet Bank’s Chairman of HomeStreetthe Board and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December31, 2016. We have used Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firmChief Executive Officer since January 1, 2013, when they replaced KPMG LLP, who audited the company’s financial statements from 2003 through 2012.

Shareholder ratification2010. He became Chairman of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not required by our bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that this selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not ratified by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company in March 2015 after serving as Vice Chairman of the Board since January 2010. Mr. Mason brings extensive business, managerial and leadership experience to our Board. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Mason was president, chief executive officer and chief lending officer for Bank Plus Corporation and its shareholders.
Representativeswholly owned banking subsidiary, Fidelity Federal Bank, where Mr. Mason also served as the chief financial officer from 1994 to 1995 and as chairman of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expectedthe board of directors from 1998 to be present at2002. From February 2008 to October 2008, Mr. Mason also served as president of a startup energy company, TEFCO, LLC. He has served on the Annual Meetingboards of directors of Hanmi Financial Corp., San Diego Community Bank and will be givenThe Bjurman Barry Family of Mutual Funds. Mr. Mason is on the opportunityboards

13

of directors of the Pacific Bankers Management Institute (the parent company of the Pacific Coast Banking School) and The Washington Bankers Association and is an advisory board member of Seattle University’s Albers School of Business and Economics. Mr. Mason is a certified public accountant (inactive) and holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration with an emphasis in Accounting from California State Polytechnic University.

Mr. Mason was selected to makeserve as a statement atdirector because of his position as our CEO and his significant experience as an executive officer, director and consultant to other banks and mortgage companies, his credit and lending experience, finance and accounting education and experience and relationships in the Annual Meeting if they desire to do sobanking industry and respond to questions about the financial statements and related matters forcapital markets.

Donald R. Voss, Lead Independent Director

Mr. Voss joined the 2013, 2014 and 2015 fiscal years.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The following table presents fees billed for professional audit services and other services rendered to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the years ended December 31,Board in March 2015 and 2014. Amounts in this table are presented in thousands.

 2015 2014
    
Audit Fees (1)
$1,353
 $741
Audit-Related Fees (2)
297
 127
Tax Fees (3)
170
 
All Other Fees (4)

 144
Total$1,820
 $1,012
(1)Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and for the review of our quarterly financial statements, as well as services that generally only our independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably provide, including statutory audits and services rendered in connection with SEC filings.
(2)Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements in connection with acquisition transactions completed by the Company during the reported fiscal year.
(3)Tax Fees consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in 2015.
(4)All Other Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, including tax filings, and tax consulting related to our acquisition activities during 2014.

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
It is the responsibility of HomeStreet’s Audit Committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy authorizing certain permissible audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor with subsequent reporting and oversight required by


the Audit Committee. Permissible services, not pre-approved pursuant to this policy, require specific review and approval prior to the engagement by the Audit Committee, or a designated member. All services rendered by and fees paid to our independent auditor are reported to and monitored quarterly by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of related audit services is compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. To assist the Audit Committee in its oversight responsibilities, the pre-approval policy identifies the three basic principles of independence with respect to services providedwas named Lead Independent Director by the independent registered public accounting firm,directors of the Board in June 2018. He previously served as a director of Simplicity Bancorp and a member of its audit committee beginning in 2011 and served as chairman of the board of directors from October 2013 until the acquisition of that company by HomeStreet in March 2015. Prior to joining Simplicity’s board of directors, Mr. Voss held a variety of positions in a 25-year career with First Interstate Bank, culminating as an executive vice president and manager of the U.S. Banking Division. Much of his banking experience was with domestic and international financial institutions. Mr. Voss is a member of the board of trustees and the executive board and serves as chair of the Planning Committee of Descanso Gardens Guild, Inc., and serves as a member of the board of directors of Valley Water Company and the executive board of the La Cañada Flintridge Sister Cities Association. He was an elected council member of the City of La Cañada Flintridge from 2006 until March 2015 and served as its mayor from 2010 to 2011. Prior to his election to the City Council, Mr. Voss served for five years as the city’s treasurer. Mr. Voss was a member of the board of the San Gabriel Valley Chapter of the American Red Cross, including three years as chairman of that board, and also served on its audit and executive committees. He also served on the governing boards of the Los Angeles County Division of the League of California Cities, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, the Southern California Association of Governments, the California Contract Cities Association and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, as well as the non-audit services the independent registered public accounting firm is prohibited from providing. All services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP in eachadvisory board of the last two fiscal years were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP AS HOMESTREET’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.


PROPOSAL 3
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR MAJORITY VOTING IN
NON-CONTESTED ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS

Introduction
In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a shareholder proposal, along with the supporting statementSanta Monica Mountains Conservancy, an agency of the shareholder proponent, for which westate of California. Mr. Voss holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Washington and oura graduate degree in banking from the Stonier Graduate School of Banking.

Mr. Voss was selected to serve as a director because of his general business, financial, credit and risk management, treasury management, and governance skills and because of his civic involvement.

Sandra A. Cavanaugh, Director

Ms. Cavanaugh joined the Board accept no responsibility. The shareholder proposal is requiredin May 2018. Ms. Cavanaugh has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services, banking and mutual fund industries. As president and CEO of U.S. Private Client Services of Russell Investments from January 2010 until her retirement in June 2016, Ms. Cavanaugh oversaw a $45 billion mutual fund business in the U.S. Prior to be voted uponjoining Russell Investments, Ms. Cavanaugh was an executive vice president at our Annual Meeting only if properly presentedSunTrust Bank in 2009, and held senior executive positions at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the shareholder proposal.


Washington Mutual/JP Morgan Chase from 2007 to 2009, including as president of WM Funds Distributor and Shareholder Services from 1997 to 2007. Ms. Cavanaugh also held various senior positions with AIM Mutual Funds, First Interstate Bank and American Savings Bank. Since her retirement from Russell Investments in 2016, Ms. Cavanaugh has provided consulting services to help financial services companies build and execute brand, product and distribution strategies. In addition to her executive career, Ms. Cavanaugh holds several board and advisory roles. She received her bachelor’s degree in History with a minor in business from California State Retirement Teachers’ System, located at 100 Waterfront Place, MS-04, West Sacramento, California 95605-2807,University, Fresno and previously held active NASD/FINRA Securities Licenses Series 7, 24, and 53.

Ms. Cavanaugh was selected to serve as a director because of her executive management, business and financial experience and her background as an expert in the beneficial owner of no less than $2,000 in market value of the Company’s common stock held continuously for over one year prior to the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of its intent to present the following proposal and supporting statement at the Annual Meeting.financial services industry.

14

Proposal
BE IT RESOLVED:
That the shareholders of HomeStreet, Inc. hereby request that the Board of Directors initiate the appropriate process to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

2020 Shareholder Outreach

At our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, directors Nancy Pellegrino and James Mitchell each received support from 98.7% of votes cast. For the “say-on-pay” vote approving our executive compensation, we received approval from 97.7% of votes cast (for and against). Based on this high approval rating and the feedback we received from our investors generally in 2020, we do not believe our shareholders have significant concerns about our executive compensation program.

We routinely provide opportunities for our shareholders to connect with our leadership team and actively solicit feedback from our largest shareholders on matters such as corporate governance, executive compensation, Company performance and other areas of investor concern. In keeping with past practice, in 2020 we reached out to shareholders holding approximately 40% of our outstanding shares measured as of June 30, 2020 to offer those investors calls with our management team and, if desired, our independent directors. We spoke with one shareholder who was largely complimentary of our progress in governance matters, executive compensation and Company performance, and heard from several others that they were pleased with our recent performance and did not need to meet with us at this time. In addition to these meetings, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer attended six investor and industry conferences where we were able to engage with a pluralitynumber of active managers of hedge funds and mutual funds who are investors or potential investors in HomeStreet. We also routinely schedule ad hoc meetings with individual current or prospective investors in addition to the aforementioned conferences Because of the global pandemic, these meetings were all held remotely in 2020, which allowed our leadership team to interact with investors more often than they would have in a typical year as travel time and travel costs were not a factor. As part of our ongoing governance outreach, we also conducted a meeting with Glass, Lewis & Co., a well-recognized proxy advisory services company. This discussion included soliciting feedback and offering updates to topics such as the Company’s plans for future annual shareholders’ meetings, executive compensation practices, and board and management diversity initiatives.

We also commenced the declassification of our board structure in 2020, having asked our shareholders to vote standard retainedon such measure at the 2019 annual meeting following concerns voiced about our classified board by shareholders leading up to that meeting. We are continuing to declassify the Board, with two thirds of the total Board standing for contestedannual election this year; the full Board will stand for annual election beginning with the annual meeting in 2022.

Shareholder Interest in Environmental, Social and Governance Matters

Several of our larger investors have provided statements to the market and to their portfolio companies generally regarding matters relating to environmental, social and governance matters (“ESG Matters”) in recent years. These have often focused on issues of diversity, equity and inclusion for boards of directors and senior management, concerns about addressing climate change and environmental issues and social justice and equality. While we have not engaged individually with our investors on these matters in any significant depth, we are aware of and actively considering the issues they have raised.

Our nominating and governance committee, the Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee (“HRCG”), consistent with our Principles of Corporate Governance, continues to make diversity a priority in identifying and considering potential director elections,candidates. In addition, in 2020 the Washington state legislature adopted a new law that applies to companies like ours that are incorporated in that state providing that at least 25% of our Board of Directors must be comprised of individuals who identify as women for our Board to be considered “gender diverse”, and if we do not have a gender diverse board for at least 270 days of any year, we will be required to provide discussion and analysis to our shareholders regarding the Board’s approach to developing and maintaining diversity on the Board of Directors.

We have also listened to concerns raised generally by investors and proxy advisory firms regarding environmental issues such as climate change and sustainability, and we are currently considering ways we can address those issues within our industry and operations. We have automated much of our loan processing in a way that allows for more electronic documentation to be used, reducing our reliance on paper loan documents, and are proud to have our headquarters located in a building that is whenLEED Platinum certified as well as five other locations that are certified LEED Platinum or LEED Gold. We currently do not have a means to track data on the environmental impact of our customers, which we believe is consistent with how other regional banks do business at this time. We will continue to engage with our shareholders on ideas to improve our awareness and attention to these issues.

15

With respect to social issues, we have seen a number of director nominees exceeds the number of board seats.

Statement of Shareholder Regarding Proposal:
In order to provide shareholders a meaningful rolesocial issues, particularly around race and access, that have become prominent in director elections, the Company’s current director election standard should be changed from a plurality vote standard to a majority vote standard. The majority vote standard is the most appropriate voting standard for director elections where only board nominated candidates are on the ballot, and it will establish a challenging vote standard for board nomineesour communities this past year. We believe in investing in our communities to improve the performancelives of individual directorsthose who live there, and entire boards. Under the Company’s current voting system,in 2020 made investments in organizations that provide assistance to historically underserved populations a nomineeprominent part of our community engagement. Our Community Relations, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Director is responsible for the board can be elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, because “withheld” votes have no legal effect. A majority vote standard would require that a nominee receive a majority of the votes cast in order to be re-electeddeveloping, leading and continue to serve as a representative for the shareholders.
In response to strong shareholder support a substantial number of the nation’s leading companies have adopted a majority vote standard in company bylaws or articles of incorporation. In fact, more than 94% of the companies in the S&P 500 have adopted majority voting for uncontested elections. We believe the Company needs to join the growing list of companiesimplementing initiatives that have already adopted this, standard.
Ca1STRSa measurable impact on diversity, equity and inclusion at HomeStreet. We also have in place a diversity committee made up of employees from a variety of ethnic backgrounds, job functions, and titles to identify ways to increase and promote opportunities for minorities within the company. Our goal is to offer opportunities to traditionally underrepresented members of our communities a long-term shareholderchance to advance through training, education, and mentoring. Our focus on these issues is not just internal, but also on our communities in which we do business. In 2020 we donated to non-profit organizations with a focus on career assistance, job training, and placement for minority, underserved and low-income populations in our markets.

Ongoing Shareholder Engagement

We encourage all of our shareholders to reach out to us with questions or comments they may have regarding the Company, and we will continue to seek out shareholders through our existing outreach programs. We maintain an investor relations website at ir.homestreet.com, and shareholders can reach our investor relations department by email at ir@homestreet.com; by phone at (206) 389-6303; and by mail at HomeStreet Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101. Shareholders can also find our Shareholder Engagement Procedures and Practices on our investor relations website, which provides guidelines for how shareholders can communicate with our Board.

16

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

As a bank holding company, we believe it is important to foster an operating environment that accountabilityarticulates a strong focus on compliance and ethical standards, and our Board sets this tone from the top. Our Board is of upmost importance.actively engaged in designing, monitoring and enforcing compliance with high governance standards. We believe the plurality vote standard currently in place at the Company completely disenfranchises shareholdersdiscuss our most important corporate governance policies and makes the shareholder’s role in director elections meaningless. Majority voting in director elections will empower shareholders with the ability to remove poorly performing directors and increase the directors’ accountability to the owners of the Company, its shareholders. In addition, those directors who receive the majority support from shareholders will know they have the backing of the very shareholders they represent. We therefore ask you to join us in requesting that the Board of directors promptly adopt the majority vote standard for director elections.

Please vote FOR this proposal.
Board Recommendation
After considering the merits of the shareholder’s position as stated below, the Board determined that the advantages of majority voting outweigh the disadvantages, and believe that the best interestspractices below. Each of our shareholders are served by adopting this proposal. This recommendation should not be construed as a suggestion that the shareholder’s


explanation reflects the Board’s position entirely, or that the Board did not consider these and other reasons in reaching its decision to recommend adoption. Likewise, the Board considered the fact that, while one or more shareholders might feel strongly enough about a corporate governance matter to offer a formal proposal, that shareholder’s interests might differ in material respects from those of our shareholders as a whole, or from those of a majority of our shareholders. Nevertheless, considering the circumstances attendant to this request, the explanation profferedpolicies is reviewed by the shareholder in support of its position, the interests of our shareholders at large,committee responsible for that policy and the best interests of the Company, thefull Board has unanimously recommended the adoption of the foregoing resolution.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR MAJORITY VOTING
IN NON-CONTESTED ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS.
at least once every year, and more frequently if warranted.



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Code of Ethics

The Board has established a code of ethics as defined under the Exchange Act, thatwhich applies to all HomeStreet directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) is available on our website at http://ir.homestreet.com. We will post on our website any amendments to, or waivers (with respect to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller) from, this Code of Ethics within four business days of any such amendment or waiver.waiver and, to the extent required by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Select Market, by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing such information. Among other things, the Code of Ethics addresses the following principles:

•        complying with laws and regulations;

•        prohibiting insider trading;

•        avoiding conflicts of interest;

•        avoiding questionable gifts or favors;

•        maintaining accurate and complete records;

•        treating others in an ethical manner;

•        maintaining integrity of consultants, agents and representatives; and

•        protecting proprietary information and proper use of assets.

Whistleblower Policy

In addition to our Code of Ethics, we maintain a whistleblower policy which is intended to provide guidance to employees, shareholders and others who may be aware of or concerned about potential violations of our Code of Ethics or other forms of misconduct and wish to report such concerns to our Ethics Compliance with Section 16(a)Officer, either directly or anonymously through our whistleblower hotline or website.

We have crafted our whistleblower policy to make clear our commitment to providing a confidential process in which individuals can raise questions and concerns about potential misconduct, including potential violations of law, regulation or Company policy, and report potential misconduct while strictly prohibiting any attempt by any director, officer or employee of the ExchangeCompany to identify whistleblowers or retaliate or attempt to retaliate against any whistleblower, anonymous or otherwise. Nothing in the policy is intended to prohibit or impede the reporting of alleged accounting irregularities or securities violations, or anything else covered by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,

Section 16(a) the Dodd-Frank Act or any other applicable law directly to the SEC whether or not an initial report is made internally to the Company. The Company has also amended all of its severance agreements and confidentiality agreements with employees to provide similar assurances to employees and former employees.

We provide information on how to access our third-party whistleblower hotline, EthicsPoint, by telephone or through the Exchange Act requiresInternet on both our executive officersinternal human resources website and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities (our “Reporting Persons”), to fileexternal investor relations website.

At each regular meeting the Audit Committee discusses all current whistleblower reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities. Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies ofEthics Compliance Officer, including all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of suchnew reports received or written representations from certain Reporting Persons,since the Company believes that during fiscal 2015 all Reporting Persons complied with all applicable requirements except that one executive officer had a late Form 4 filinglast meeting, any ongoing whistleblower investigations and one director had a late Form 3 filing.the resolution of any closed investigation.

17

Principles of Corporate Governance

The Company has adopted Principles of Corporate Governance, which are available on the Company’s website at http://ir.homestreet.com. Shareholders may request a free copy of the Principles of Corporate Governance at the address and phone numbers set forth above.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that, with the exception of Mark Mason, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, all of its members are currently “independentindependent directors” as that term is defined in the listing standards of Nasdaq and, where applicable, the regulations adopted under Sections 10A and 14C10C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.Act. In the course of determining the independence of each nonemployee director, the Board considered the annual amount of HomeStreet’s sales to, or purchases from, any company where a nonemployee director serves as an executive officer as well as all other relevant facts and circumstances, including the director’s commercial, accounting, legal, banking, consulting, charitable and familial relationships. Without limiting

Board Diversity

Our Principles of Corporate Governance include a commitment to diversity as a guideline for our director nomination process. In particular, the generalityguideline provides that the HRCG Committee “will actively seek to include highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups in the pool of candidates from which nominees for director positions are chosen, and in choosing between equally qualified candidates will give extra weight to diversity of the foregoing,candidates.” The HRCG Committee, which acts as our nominating committee, continues to consider diversity as an important goal in board refreshment, consistent with the diversity expectations we continue to hear from our shareholders in our engagement process and with the newly added requirement to the Washington Business Corporations Act requiring us to have a board that is comprised 25% by individuals who identify as women for a minimum of 270 days during the preceding year beginning January 1, 2022, or else provide our investors with a discussion and analysis of what the Company is doing to promote and maintain diversity on our Board.

Board Assessment, Refreshment and Orientation Process

Each year, our Board undertakes a formal self-evaluation process during which all members are asked to identify their areas of strength and expertise. The HRCG then aggregates this information into a report on the strength of the Board considered various aspectswhich includes, among other things, the skills matrix that we include in our proxy statement. This assessment process, and especially the skills matrix, allows the HRCG to identify where there may be gaps in the overall skill set of the relationship betweenBoard as a whole so that we can, if necessary, undertake a search for qualified candidates who not only have senior-management level experience in public companies, financial institutions and banking and fit the Companystated goals for diversity in our Principles of Corporate Governance, but can also help to broaden or deepen the skillset that we have on our Board. Based on the most recent self-assessment, the HRCG has identified expertise in cybersecurity as a desired skill set.

In recent years, the HRCG identified a need for more board refreshment and new perspectives on the Board of Directors. In 2018, the HRCG identified Sandra Cavanaugh as a board candidate because of her role in leadership in banking and mutual fund industries and her experience working in highly regulated environments, and on that she was appointed as a director by the Board. In 2019, acting on the HRCG’s recommendation, the Board appointed Nancy Pellegrino as a director based on her background in executive leadership at top tier global and national banks as well as her board level experience with corporate governance and compensation matters. Additionally, with the retirement of certain long-term directors in 2020, the Board identified a need to replace the expertise in commercial banking and commercial credit that had been represented by one of the departing directors, and identified James R. Mitchell, Jr. as a new addition to the Board in 2020 to provide that additional depth of experience in community banking and commercial credit. Acting on another need surfaced through the Board assessment process, the HRCG also identified and added Jeffrey D. Green in 2020 to provide an entity controlledadditional member of the Board who qualifies as a financial expert for the purposes of the Audit Committee, bringing additional support to Mr. Boggs who has been the long-time the chair of that committee. All candidates for director who are identified by Director Timothy R. Chrisman, discussedthe HRCG are vetted through a thorough due diligence process, and all Board members are given the opportunity to meet with director candidates at length to ask questions and get to know them before being asked to vote on the appointment of such individuals to the Board.

18

In addition, our Principles of Corporate Governance provide that directors cannot stand for election to the Board after the age of 74. This age limit is intended to encourage board refreshment. Our Board believes it is in greater detail under “Certain Relationshipsthe best interests of our shareholders to refresh our board membership on a regular basis by considering new director candidates who can bring a fresh or different perspective to the Board. We have heard from our shareholders that they also value regular board refreshment measures. From time to time the board will consider waiving the age limit based on 1) our board evaluation process, 2) whether the limit waiver inhibits or prevents a broad range of director tenures, 3) whether the limit waiver would disadvantage independent directors compared to non-independent directors, and Related Transactions,” below,4) whether the limit waiver is applied evenly, and not in a prohibited discriminatory manner. Since January 2018, we have added five new directors to the Board, Mr. Patterson, Ms. Cavanaugh, Mr. Green, Ms. Pellegrino and Mr. Mitchell, and five directors have left the Board.

While board refreshment is important to bring new perspectives, our Board has also implemented a formal onboarding and orientation process for new directors in order to maintain continuity and bring new directors up to speed with the Company’s operations, corporate governance practices and overall strategy. The orientation is designed to help new directors contribute fully to their governance work on the Board as early in their tenure as possible. As a result of the process directors are expected to understand a) their roles and responsibilities and time commitment to their governance work; b) current goals, opportunities and challenges facing the organization; c) major lines of business and the key leaders; d) key initiatives and overall business strategy; e) stakeholders; f) how their own background, knowledge and skillsets can contribute to the Board’s work and Company’s goals; g) the background, knowledge skillsets of each of the other directors and key leaders of the Company; and h) how Board decisions are made and the Company’s formal governing policies and practices. The process involves several meetings with the CEO, the lead independent director, standing committee chairpersons, a board mentor, key executives including the naturegeneral counsel and other staff. These meetings cover a broad array of topics including the strategic plan and planning process; the Company’s vision values goals and culture; the company’s recent successes and challenges; charters of the servicescompany, its principal subsidiaries and various committees; board and executive compensation details and philosophies; recent CEO performance reviews; executive leadership and succession planning; organization charts; biographies; board development and training. Copies of key Board documents are scheduled and provided and the payments made in connection therewith, in concluding that Mr. Chrisman is an independent director within the meaning of the applicable corporate governance standards.


hard copy or by electronic access to each new member.



Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to retain discretion to make a determination regarding whether or not to separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerCEO based upon varying circumstances.circumstances, and the majority of our shareholders have supported this approach, voting against a proposal to require the separation of those roles at our 2019 annual shareholder meeting. The Board of Directors is currently chaired by Mr. Mason, our Chief Executive Officer,CEO, who is subject to re-appointmentre-appointment as Chairman of the Board each year by the BoardBoard. Our Principles of Directors.

Since our Initial Public Offering in 2012,Corporate Governance provide that if the Chairman of the Board is an executive of the Company, the independent directors shall elect a Lead Independent Director.

The Company’s bylaws and Principles of Corporate Governance provide a clear description of the role of the Lead Independent Director: the Lead Independent Director is responsible for presiding over all executive sessions of independent or non-management directors, and in the absence of the Chairman of the Board presiding over shareholder meetings and Board meetings; serves as the liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors; meets with the Chairman prior to all Board Meetings to review and discuss the agenda; and has maintainedthe right to approve meeting agendas, meeting schedules and other information sent to the Board. The Lead Independent Director also serves as the primary point of contact (through the Corporate Secretary) for shareholders wishing to engage with the Board.

The Board maintains a Lead Independent Director to facilitate discussion, coordinate and reflect the views of the independent board members.directors and, most importantly, to ensure that the Company’s governance practices are aligned in the best interests of all shareholders. Mr. BoggsVoss was appointed by the independent directors of the Board in 2018 and currently serves in that role. The Board reviews the appointment of our Lead Independent Director position each year.

The Board believes that this leadership structure provides balance and currently is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The role given to the Lead Independent Director helps to ensure a strong, independent and is subjectactive board, while Mr. Mason serving as the Chairman of the Board enables the Company and the Board to reappointment each year bycontinue to benefit from his skills and expertise, including his extensive knowledge of the Board.Company and its industry and his experience successfully navigating the Company through both strong and challenging periods.

19

The following table illustrates how responsibilities are delegated between Mr. Mason and Mr. Voss:

Chairman/Chief Executive Officer

Lead Independent Director

Board Meeting

•   Authority to call full meetings of the Board

•   Presides over meetings of the full Board

•   Attends full meetings of the Board

•   Presides over meetings of independent directors and non-management directors

•   Briefs Chairman on issues arising from executive sessions

•   Presides over meetings of the Board in the absence of the Chairman

Agenda

•   Primary responsibility for shaping Board agendas, consulting with the lead independent director

•   Collaborates with Chairman to set Board agenda and provide Board with information

•   Approves agenda and meeting schedules to be sent to the Board

Board Communications

•   Communicates with all directors on key issues and concerns outside Board meetings

•   Facilitates discussion among independent directors on key issues and concerns outside Board meetings, including contributing to the oversight of the Chairman and management succession planning

Shareholder Communications

•   Primary spokesperson for the Company in communications to shareholders

•   Serves as liaison for shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board (such communications to be sent through the Corporate Secretary)

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board, together with its committees and senior management, has oversight for our risk management framework and is responsible for overseeing the majorhelping to ensure that our risks facingare managed in a sound manner. The Board’s principal responsibility in this area is to oversee an enterprise-wide approach to risk management and ensure that sufficient resources, with appropriate technical and managerial skills, are provided throughout the Company while managementto identify, assess and facilitate processes and practices to address material risks. We believe that the current leadership structure enhances the Board’s ability to fulfill this oversight responsibility, as the Chairman, in his role as CEO, is responsible for assessing and mitigatingable to focus the Company’sBoard’s attention on the key risks on a day-to-day basis. we face.

In addition, the Board has delegated oversight of certain categories of risk to the Audit Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and the Human Resources and Corporate Governance, or HRCG Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management significant financial and nonfinancialnon-financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and report such exposures. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee oversees and assesses the adequacy of the Company’s risk management framework, monitors compliance with the Board-approved risk appetite measures and other key risk measures and oversees management of key enterprise-wide risks not overseen by other committees of the Board, including legal, compliance and monitors the Company’s risk profileoperational risks, information technology, information security and exposure to various types ofcybersecurity risks. The HRCG Committee oversees management of risks relating to the Company’s governance, compensation plans and programs. The Audit Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee and the HRCG Committee report to the Board as appropriate on matters that involve specific areas of risk that each committee oversees, and with the Board, each committee periodically discusses with management the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The board of directors of our primary subsidiary, HomeStreet Bank, also oversees

20

certain risks specific to HomeStreet Bank, including credit, liquidity, interest rate and price risk, through various committees of the HomeStreet Bank board, including credit and finance committees.

Leadership Response to COVID-19 Pandemic

In February 2020, the Puget Sound region where we are headquartered had the first reported death from COVID-19 in the United States. As a result, our communities were among the first impacted by both the outbreak of the virus in the United States and the stay home/stay safe orders that quickly followed. Our Board of Directors, including the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, Audit Committee and Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee, worked closely with management to provide crucial leadership through this unprecedented and uncertain time.

At the beginning of March 2020, our management team convened our Crisis Management Team (CMT), led by our Chief Technology and Security Officer, to focus on the health and safety of our employees and customers. Following the guidance of the CMT, management directed that those who could work from home do so immediately, a significant change for our organization, a direction that was implemented in some cases before the communities were even given official orders to stay home or shelter in place. The CMT also sourced and provided personal protective equipment, or PPE, to those who could not work from home. On March 22, 2020, the U.S. Department of the Treasury designated financial services companies as a critical infrastructure sector of the United States. By that time, HomeStreet had already begun to take actions before that date to create a safe workplace environment for its employees while continuing to meet the needs of our customers during a time of great uncertainty and change, working quickly to develop ways to keep our essential employees safe at work while still serving our customers well. Throughout the pandemic, management and the CMT have continued to provide support in several different areas:

The Board has also remained engaged in the oversight of the Company’s response to the pandemic, and receives frequent updates on employee health and welfare, the impact of economic challenges created by the pandemic on the credit quality of the Bank’s various portfolios, and an ongoing and frequently updated robust analysis of the impact to the Company’s risk profile of the pandemic and related economic challenges.

Overall, HomeStreet went to great lengths to care for its employees and customers during 2020, which was an unusual year of extended crisis due not only to the COVID-19 pandemic but also because of regional, civil unrest in many of our banking communities. Our CEO and senior leadership participated extensively in the CMT as a part of this response. The CMT consists of 16 core members and 9 optional participants, and during 2020 it met approximately 80 times to evaluate, plan, and act to keep HomeStreet back office and front branch locations safe for our workers, customers and vendors. This team promptly engaged in broad information gathering and learning efforts to gain as much real-time knowledge as was available from city, state, federal and global sources including medical, legal, social and financial organizations to develop an effective approach to leading the business through the intense uncertainty. We categorize the details of the work done by the CMT into four main areas: operational response, direct employee support, resource repository and exposures and actual protections.

Operational COVID-19 Response

In order to protect the physical health of our employees and customers, branch access for all Bank branches was limited to appointment only hours, and the CMT developed a comprehensive Phased Social Distancing and Return to Work Plan for employees to learn and understand our newly implemented emergency measures. We adopted a Social Distancing Policy and COVID-19 Sanitation Measures across all office and branch locations. Our Senior Vice President, Chief Technology and Security Officer, was designated as the officer charged with the responsibility and authority to establish, implement and enforce this Policy consistent with guidance from relevant federal and state health authorities.

Management and CMT also provided support and other resources to our lending teams as they worked to provide customers with crucial loan assistance due to the financial impacts of the pandemic. Following the passage of the CARES our lending teams focused on supporting as many customers as possible in obtaining crucial loan assistance, both through the extension of new credit such as PPP funds or working with our existing borrowers experiencing difficulties by offering forbearance or other loan modifications where appropriate.

21

Communication

We also put a priority on open, clear and timely communication to employees and to highly impacted customers during this challenging and uncertain time. Our leadership team, especially our Chief Executive Officer, increased communications with these groups, including through a frequent webcast open to all employees featuring a question and answer session to address employee’s concerns, in an effort to provide information, assurance, guidance and solicit feedback in this difficult time.

Outside of these direct communications, key leaders within the CMT also developed multiple successive rounds of frequently asked questions to share with employees as new information developed to keep employees fully informed of safety and security requirements. We created guidance documents for managers to help with managing virtual staff and hiring, and we implemented guidance and restrictions related to public gatherings and travel. Offices were marked with new internal signage, we limited meeting spaces and closed or reduced group gathering spaces. We also increased the frequency of localized cleaning for high-touch areas within shared office spaces.

Direct Employee Support

Recognizing challenges employees were facing due to the pandemic, social unrest, changes in work environment, changes in personal lives and for many, changes with parenting and schooling, we developed resources specifically to help parents think about micro-schools and juggling changing demands with home schooling children along with several other resource guides around parenting, and other childcare resources. We increased communications to employees to remind them of employee assistance plan benefits, and we conducted a special postcard home-mailing to employees to provide them our employee assistance program details and contact information. We also began implementing a mobile phone text-based interface with medical professionals that we launched in early 2021 allowing employees to receive some medical services remotely.

Recognizing employees who were working remotely were in a new work environment, we shared tips and videos about working from home, evaluating their at-home workstation, and how to stay ergonomically safe while working from home. We also offered employees the opportunity to take certain of our surplus office furniture such as desks, chairs and filing cabinets for their home use, thereby reducing the amount of surplus equipment we were holding in inventory following our 2019 reduction in force while also providing much needed home office equipment to employees free of charge.

For our frontline branch and essential operations workers who were unable to work remotely, we provided an increased benefit allowing employees to take 5 paid days away from work for extra relief and rest away from the office in recognition of the increased stress of working in a customer-facing environment during this challenging time. A total of 269 employees took advantage of this, for an aggregate 8,853 hours of relief and rest time being used by our employees during 2020.

Resource Repository

HomeStreet also created a webpage, which is available to all employees, containing all the above-mentioned resource materials. This website also included guidance around travel and social distancing safety, resources for printing signage for retail branches, and information for employees who chose to take a furlough due to extraordinarily difficult health or family situations regarding continuing their medical benefits and protecting their ability to return to their jobs.

COVID-19 Exposures and Actual Protections

We restricted visitors and implemented safety training for all employees and protocols requiring employees to take temperatures and attest to their own wellbeing before coming to work each day. Despite our strong social distancing and safety efforts in the workplace, a small number of our employees did become exposed to COVID-19 through their personal or social interactions outside work. However, with our robust process and contact tracing protocols, which were handled internally through our Human Resources team, we promptly received notification, directed impacted individuals to isolate away from work, and when necessary, traced possible exposures at the workplace and erred on the side of caution by sending employees home if there was a risk of close contact. Additionally, HomeStreet continued wage payments to employees who were quarantined away from work either due to healthcare provider, CDC or employer quarantine requirements and did not require employees to take personal sick or vacation time if it was due to these safety measures. We believe that our strong focus on action and attention to safety in our workplaces has been key to our success to date in significantly restricting the spread of COVID-19 at our facilities.

22

Information Security Risks

The Board oversees the Company’s cyber risk management program through the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, or ERMC, which is tasked with oversight of risk issues, including cybersecurity and information security risks, and is comprised entirely of independent directors. Our Chief Information Officer and Chief Technology and Security Officer, who oversees our information security program and our vendor management program, have led the way to develop programs and policies to address and respond to the threat of security breaches and cyberattacks in order to protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity and continued availability of all information owned by, controlled by or in possession of the Company and our vendors, including both the Company’s sensitive and confidential information and the information of our customers, employees and affiliates. These programs and policies are reviewed and updated on a regular basis, and the implementation of such programs and policies is overseen by those officers along with our Information Security Program Office.

Certain of these programs and policies address incident response processes, including a cyber incident response plan that provides controls and procedures for timely and accurate reporting of any material cybersecurity incident. The ERMC receives quarterly reports from the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Security and Technology Officer and Chief Risk Officer as well as interim reports on large scale cybersecurity events and the impact, if any, on the Company. The Board and the ERMC also periodically receive updates about the results of exercises and response readiness assessments led by internal staff as well as outside advisors who provide a third-party independent assessment of our technical program and our internal response preparedness. The ERMC regularly briefs the full Board on these matters, and the full Board also receives periodic briefings on cyber threats in order to enhance our directors’ literacy on cyber issues.

The ERMC has engaged a cybersecurity expert to work closely with the ERMC to independently review our cybersecurity-related policies and processes, provide training and advice on cybersecurity and information security matters, and materials provided by the consultant are often provided to the full Board to better inform all directors on matters of cybersecurity and information security risks. All of our employees also receive periodic training in cybersecurity and information security risk management and mitigation through required corporate training courses, and ongoing phishing exercise. We maintain an additional insurance policy to help defray the potential costs of a cybersecurity incident, were one to occur.

Employee Compensation Risks

HomeStreet’s management and the HRCG Committee have assessed the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including non-executivenon-executive officers. Based on the results of this assessment, we do not believe that our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including non-executivenon-executive officers, create excessive risks or other risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on HomeStreet.

Board Meetings and Committees

During the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, the Board held 1213 meetings. Each of our directors attended or participated in 75% or more of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which that director served during the past fiscal year.

The Board of Directors has threefour standing committees: an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee, an Enterprise Risk Management Committee and a Human Resources and Corporate Governancean HRCG Committee.

23




2020 Committee MembershipMemberships of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.


Director

Executive Committee

Director

Audit Committee

Human Resources and Corporate Governance

HRCG Committee

Enterprise
Risk Management Committee

David A. Ederer,

Mark K. Mason, Chairman Emeritus

Chair

  X
Mark K. Mason, Chairman   

Scott M. Boggs

Chair

 X
Timothy R. Chrisman

ü

 X
Victor H. Indiek

Chair

  X

ü

Thomas E. King

Sandra A. Cavanaugh

 XX
George “Judd” Kirk X
Douglas I. SmithXChair
Donald R. VossX 

ü

Chair

Jeffrey D. GreenBruce W. Williams (1)(1)

X

ü

ü

  

James R. Mitchell, Jr.

ü

ü

Mark R. Patterson

ü

ü

Nancy D. Pellegrino(1)

ü

ü

Douglas I. Smith

ü

Chair

Donald R. Voss

ü

ü

ü

David A. Ederer, Chairman Emeritus(3)

ü

ü

Thomas E. King(3)

ü

ü

George “Judd” Kirk(3)

ü

ü

____________

(1)      Mr. Williams will retireGreen joined the Board in June 2020 and was appointed to the Audit Committee and HRCG Committee at that time.

(2)      Ms. Pellegrino was appointed to the Enterprise Risk Management Committee in June 2020.

(3)      Mr. Ederer, Mr. King and Mr. Kirk served in these roles through the end of their terms as director on May 21, 2020.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee is composed of at least three members of the Board, a majority of whom are required to be and are independent directors as determined by the Board. The Chairman of the Board serves as the Chair of the committee. The Executive Committee is delegated authority to act on behalf of the Board on certain matters that are not otherwise delegated to another committee of the Board in between regularly scheduled Board meetings. The Executive Committee is not authorized to take any action that cannot be delegated by the Board under Washington law and is also expressly not authorized to adopt any agreement for merger or consolidation, recommend to shareholders the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, recommend a dissolution of the Company (or the revocation of a dissolution) to the shareholders, amend the Bylaws, elect officers, fill vacancies on the Board, declare a dividend, or authorize the issuance of stock (other than pursuant to specific delegation from the Board of Directors effective aswhere the Board has already approved the issuance and the Executive Committee is approving certain details of the 2016 Annual Meeting.

issuance), all of which are expressly reserved to the full Board.

Audit Committee

The

Our Audit Committee of HomeStreet, Inc. is composed solely of independent directors as required by the Nasdaq corporate governance standards, and each of Messrs. Boggs, Smith, Voss and Williamsthe members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements set forth in all applicable Nasdaq corporate governance standards, including independence requirements for audit committee members, and Rule 10A-310A-3 under the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that each of Mr. Boggs and Mr. Green is also qualified as an “audit committee financial expert.”

The Company’s

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written Audit Committee charter that meets the requirements of the applicable Exchange Act rules and the applicable Nasdaq corporate governance standards. A copy of this charter is available on our website at http://ir.homestreet.com. Among other things, the Audit Committee charter requires the Audit Committee to:

•        oversee the financial reporting process on behalf of our board of directors, review and discuss the audited financial statements, including significant financial reporting judgments, with management and the Company’s auditors and report the results of its activities to the board;

•        be responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation, oversight, evaluation and termination of our auditors and review the engagement and independence of our auditors;

24

•        review and approve non-auditnon-audit services, including a reconciliation of fees actually paid for non-creditnon-audit services as compared to fees previously approved for such services;

•        review the adequacy of our internal accounting controls and financial reporting processes;

•        approve and monitor our internal audit plans and policies;

•        review the performance compensation and independence of our Chief Audit Officer; and

•        annually evaluate the performance of the Audit Committee and assess the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter.

The Audit Committee held 10eight meetings during the last fiscal year. The Audit Committee Report is included in this Proxy Statement.



Enterprise Risk Management Committee

The membership of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee is limited to persons who meet the independence standards established by the Nasdaq corporate governance rules and is currently comprised solely of independent directors as defined by such rules. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee overseesof the Company meets jointly with the Enterprise Risk Management Committee of HomeStreet Bank, and assessestogether they oversee and assess the adequacy of the Company'sCompany’s tolerance and management of key enterprise-wideenterprise-wide risks, including credit, interest rate, risk, liquidity, price, operational, compliance/legal, strategic and reputational risks. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee is also responsible for monitoring the Company'sCompany’s risk profile and exposure to various types of risks, including cybersecurity and information security risks, as well as reviewing management’s adherence to the Company'sCompany’s established risk management policies and benchmarks. As with other committees of the Company, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee is authorized to hire such independent experts as the committee may deem necessary or appropriate, and at present engages a cybersecurity and information security expert to help with oversight and assessment of the Company’s risks in those areas. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee is required to meet at least quarterly.

The Board has adopted a written Enterprise Risk Management Committee charter, a current copy of which is available on our website at http://ir.homestreet.com. Among other things, this charter requires the Enterprise Risk Management Committee to:

define, in conjunction with the Board and management, the Company’s

•        recommend risk appetite and tolerances for risk offor the Company and its subsidiaries;

subsidiaries to be approved by the Board;

•        review and approve the Company’s enterprise risk assessments prepared in connection with the Company’s strategic plan including theits capital plan;

•        monitor the implementationCompany’s risk profile and ongoing and potential exposure to material risks of changes in significant regulations andvarious types, including monitoring the impact of such changes upon the Company’s significant risks;

monitor overall capital adequacy and capacity within the context of the approved risk limits and actual results;

•        provide a forum for evaluating and integrating risk issues, processes and events arising within the Company and its subsidiaries;

•        coordinate with various Board committees a discussion of the Company’s significant processes for risk assessment, risk management and actions taken by management to monitor, control and remediate risk exposures;

•        oversee compliance and fair lending practices, including:

•        review regulatory examinations and reports;

•        monitor the implementation of any corrective action agreed to under regulatory examination reports;

•        review and approve the Company’s Compliance Management System, Fair Lending Policy and Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) Policy;

•        appoint the Chief Compliance Officer, Fair Lending Officer and BSA Officer; and

25

•        monitor the implementation of changes in significant regulations and the impact of such changes upon the Company’s significant risks;

•        oversee information technology, information security and physical security practices, including:

•        reviewing reports from management on technology and security risks, including cyber risks; and

•        appointing the Chief Security Officer and Chief Information Security Officer;

•        review and approve, at least annually, risk related policies; and

•        review the performance, compensation and independence of the EnterpriseChief Risk Management Director.

Officer.

The Enterprise Risk Management Committee held 4five meetings during the last fiscal year.

Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee

The HRCG Committee acts as both our nominating and corporate governance committee and our compensation committee. The HRCG Committee has the authority to establish and implement our corporate governance practices, nominate individuals for election to the board of directors andBoard, evaluate and set compensation with respect to our directors and executive officers and oversee issues related to management of human capital resources, among other things. AsBeginning in 2021, the HRCG will also receive reports from the Company’s Community Relations and Diversity Equity & Inclusion Officer at least two times a year to increase oversight of and involvement in the datemanagement of this Proxy Statement,our human capital resources.

Although the HRCG Committee receives input from our Chief Executive Officer, executive leadership and the HRCG Committee’s independent compensation advisor, the HRCG Committee makes its own independent determinations regarding executive officer compensation. The HRCG Committee is composed solely of independent directors under Nasdaq corporate governance rules, each of whom has also been determined to be independent pursuant to Rule 10C-1(b)10C-1(b)(1) of the Exchange Act describing independence standards relating to members of the compensation committee. During 2015 we made certain payments to a company controlled by Director Timothy R. Chrisman, who serves on the HRCG Committee, however, in light of the amounts and circumstances relating to those payments, the Board has determined that such payments did not impair the independence of the affiliated director. For more on that relationship, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.



Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the HRCG Committee that satisfies the applicable standards of Nasdaq Corporate Governance rules as to both compensation and nominating committee requirements. A copy of this charter is available on our website at http://ir.homestreet.com. Among other things, this charter calls upon HRCG Committee to:

•        develop and recommend to the Board criteria for identifying and evaluating candidates to become Board and committee members;

•        identify, review the qualifications of, and recruit candidates for election to the Board;

•        assess the contributions and independence of incumbent directors in determining whether to recommend them for reelection to the Board and appointment to one or more committees of the Board;

•        function as a compensation committee for the purpose of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(d);

•        select and recommend to the Board director nominees for election or reelection to the Board at each annual meeting of shareholders;

•        develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the corporation, including periodic review and reassessment of such principles;

•        make recommendations to the Board concerning the structure, composition and functioning of the Board and its committees;

•        review and assess the channels through which the Board receives information, and the quality and timeliness of the information received;

•        oversee the evaluation of the Board and its committees;

26

•        review and recommend changes as appropriate to the Board in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and biannually review this Code;

code;

•        review and oversee the Company’s overall compensation structure, philosophy, policies, benefit plans and programs (including for directors and management) and assess whether the Company’s compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees;

•        review and approve the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”),CEO, evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and recommend to the independent directors the CEO’s compensation level based on this evaluation. The CEO cannot be present during any voting or deliberations by the HRCG on his or her compensation;

•        oversee the evaluation of Bank executive officers and set the compensation of such officers;

•        review, approve and recommend to the Board employment agreements and severance agreements for executive officers, including change-in-controlchange-in-control provisions, plans or agreements; and

•        review succession plans relating to positions held by executive officers and make recommendations to the Board regarding the selection of individuals to fill these positions.

The HRCG Committee charter allows the committee to delegate its duties and responsibilities related to compensation, nomination and corporate governance to a subcommittee of the HRCG Committee that consists of not less than two members of the HRCG Committee.

The HRCG Committee held 10eight meetings during the last fiscal year. The HRCG Committee Report is included in this Proxy Statement.

Interaction with Consultants

Pursuant to its charter, the HRCG Committee has the sole authority to retain, terminate, obtain advice from, oversee and compensate its outside advisors, including its compensation consultant. The Company has provided appropriate funding authority to the HRCG Committee to do so.

In November 2012, the

The HRCG Committee retainedretains Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”Pearl Meyer”) as its independent executive compensation consultant. None of the Company’s management participated in the HRCG Committee’s decision to retain PM&P. PM&PPearl Meyer. Pearl Meyer reports directly to the HRCG Committee and the HRCG Committee may replace PM&PPearl Meyer or hire



additional consultants at any time. PM&PPearl Meyer attends meetings of the HRCG Committee, as requested, and communicates with the Chair of the HRCG Committee between meetings; however, the HRCG Committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.
PM&P

Pearl Meyer provides various executive compensation services to the HRCG Committee with respect to HomeStreet’s executive officers and other key employees pursuant to a written consulting agreement with the HRCG Committee. The services PM&PPearl Meyer provides under the agreement include advising the HRCG Committee on the principal aspects of HomeStreet’s executive compensation program and evolving best practices given the Company’s particular circumstances, and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of HomeStreet’s program design and HomeStreet’s award values in relationship to its performance.

The HRCG Committee regularly reviews the services provided by its outside consultants and believes that PM&PPearl Meyer is independent in providing executive compensation consulting services. The HRCG Committee conducted a specific review ofperiodically monitors the Company’s relationship with PM&P at the time of their initial engagement in 2012Pearl Meyer with regard to among other things the requirements of Nasdaq rules related to the selection and assessment of conflictsconflicts of interest pertaining to compensation consultants, and determined that PM&P’sPearl Meyer’s work for the HRCG Committee did not raise any conflictsconflicts of interest.

The HRCG Committee continues to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on a periodic basis.

Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the HRCG Committee served as an officer or employee of the Company during fiscalfiscal year 20152020 or any of the three previous years or has had any relationships or participated in any related party transactions that qualify as “interlocking” or cross-board memberships that are required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC. See alsoDuring fiscal year 2020, none of our executive officers served on the “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” section in this Proxy Statement.board of directors or compensation committee of any company where one of that company’s executive officers served as one of our directors.

27

Process for Recommending Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors

The HRCG Committee is responsible for, among other things, determining the criteria for membership to the Board and recommending candidates for election to the Board. It is the policy of the HRCG Committee to consider recommendationsfor candidates to the Board from shareholders. Shareholder recommendationsfor candidates to the Board must be directed in writing to HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data and qualifications,qualifications, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company within the last three years and evidence of the nominating person’s ownership of the Company’s common stock. Such recommendationsmust also include a statement from the recommending shareholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the criteria for Board membership, including issues of character, judgment, diversity, age, independence, background, skills, expertise, corporate experience, length of service, other commitments and the like, personal references, and an indication of the candidate’s willingness to serve. Nominees for our Board of Director must also meet any approval requirements set forth by our regulators.

The HRCG Committee regularly reviews the current composition and size of the Board. The HRCG Committee’s criteria and process for evaluating and identifying the candidates that it recommends to the full Board, for selection as director nominees are as follows:

•        In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of the Board eligible for re-election,re-election, the HRCG Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and considers (1)the current size and composition of the Board and the needs of the Board and the respective committees of the Board, (2)such factors as issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflictsconflicts of interest, other commitments and the like, and (3)such other factors as the HRCG Committee may consider appropriate.

•        



In addition to the criteria listed above, the Board and HRCG Committee have made a commitment to diversity on the Board a priority. In 2017, the Board amended our Principles of Corporate Governance to include a mandate that the HRCG Committee actively seek to include highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups in the pool of candidates from which nominees for director positions are chosen, and in choosing between equally qualified candidates to give extra weight to the diversity of the candidates.

•        While we have not established specificspecific minimum qualificationsqualifications for director candidates, we believe that candidates and nominees must reflectreflect a Board of Directors that is comprised of directors who: (1)are predominantly independent, (2)are of high integrity, (3)have broad, business-relatedbusiness-related knowledge and experience at the policy-makingpolicy-making level in business or technology, including their understanding of the Company’s business in particular, (4)have qualificationsqualifications that will increase the overall effectiveness of the Board and (5)meet other requirements as may be required by applicable rules, such as financialfinancial literacy or financialfinancial expertise with respect to audit committee members.

•        

With regard to candidates who are properly recommended by shareholders or by other means, the HRCG Committee will review the qualificationsqualifications of any such candidate, which review may, in the HRCG Committee’s discretion, include interviewing references for the candidate, direct interviews with the candidate, requesting additional information to be shared with our regulators or other actions that the HRCG Committee deems necessary or proper.

•        In evaluating and identifying candidates, the HRCG Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any third-partythird-party search firmfirm that is used to identify director candidates and has the authority to approve the fees and retention terms of any search firm.

firm.

•        The HRCG Committee will apply these same principles when evaluating Board candidates who may be elected initially by the full Board to fillfill vacancies or add additional directors prior to the annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are elected.

•        After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, the HRCG Committee recommends the director nominees to the full Board.

28

Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders by the Board of Directors

Although

HomeStreet does not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board at our annual meeting of shareholders,shareholders. However, we encourage but do not require, directors to attend. All of our directors then serving on our Board attended our last2020 annual meeting held in May 2015.

of shareholders virtually.

Insider Trading Policy and Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

HomeStreet has an insider trading policy that prohibits, among other things, short sales, hedging of stock ownership positions and transactions involving derivative securities relating to our common stock. The Company does not undertake any obligation to report Rule 10b5-110b5-1 trading plans that may be adopted by any of its officers and directors in the future, or to report any modificationsmodifications or terminations of any publicly announced plan, except to the extent required by law.

Contacting the Board of Directors

Any shareholder who desires to contact

In 2018, our non-employee directors may do so electronically atBoard of Directors adopted the followingHomeStreet, Inc. Shareholder Engagement Practices and Procedures, a copy of which can be found on our investor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com. Such shareholdersir.homestreet.com. Shareholders who desire to contact our non-employeenon-employee directors by mail may do so by writing HomeStreet’s Corporate Secretary at HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101.98101 or by sending an email to corporatesecretary@homestreet.com. Our Corporate Secretary receives these communications unfilteredunfiltered by HomeStreet, forwards communications to the appropriate committee of the Board or non-employeenon-employee director and facilitates an appropriate response. The Board will generally respond, or cause the Company to respond, in writing to bona fide communications from shareholders addressed to one or more directors. The Corporate Secretary will not forward spam, junk mail, mass mailings, customer complaints or inquiries, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, or patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate materials to the Board or any directors. Correspondence relating to certain of these matters such as customer issues may be distributed internally for review and possible response.

Please note that requests for investor relations materials should be sent to ir@homestreet.com.

ir@homestreet.com.

Director Compensation

Current

Non-Employee Director Compensation

For 2015, non-employee

All directors of the Company also serve as directors of HomeStreet Inc.Bank. We believe that our overall non-employee director compensation program is reasonable and appropriate based on our review of peer financial institution data and the Bankdata provided by Pearl Meyer, the HRCG Committee’s outside compensation consultant. The analysis provided by Pearl Meyer regarding our 2020 director compensation program showed that average pay per director was positioned below the 25th percentile relative to our peer group and as a result, changes were implemented to our director compensation plan effective January 1, 2021. Determination of the changes were based on market data and the time and effort spent in serving on each earnedCommittee. Director compensation is now positioned closer to the 50th percentile in order to fairly compensate directors for the levels of services they provide.

For 2020, our non-employee directors were paid an annual retainer of $40,000, while committee$64,000, with a minimum of $30,000 of that fee being paid in fully vested stock (subject to any individual director’s election to receive more of the fees in fully vested stock, up to 100% of all fees). Committee chairs each earned an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each committee chaired. David Ederer, who served as the chairman of the HomeStreet, Inc. Board of Directors forthey chair, and the first three months of 2015 and chairman emeritus for the remainder of 2015lead independent director also earned an additional $10,000 annual retainer of $20,000, and Scott Boggs, who served as the leadretainer. Each non-employee director of HomeStreet Bank beginning in March 2015, earned an annual retainer in that role of $10,000. In addition, each non-employee directoralso earned a fee of $1,000 per board meeting attended (other than



for short, telephonic board meetings for which the fee was $500 per meeting), and each non-employee committee member earned an additional fee of $500 per committee meeting attended for all committees other than the Executive Committee (other than for short, telephonic committee meetings for which the fee wasis $250 per meeting attended)meeting). Fifty percentMembers of the Executive Committee were paid an additional annual retainer wasof $10,000 for their service on that committee in lieu of per-meeting fees.

Beginning January 1, 2021, non-employee directors will receive an annual retainer of $90,000, with a minimum of 50% of that being paid in cash andfully vested stock (subject to any individual director’s election to receive more of the remaining fifty percent was paidfees in commonfully vested stock, under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. All meeting fees were paid in cash. Beginning in 2016, while the amount of compensation earned by directors will remain the same, each director will have the option to have up to 100% of theirall fees). Committee chairs of the HRCG Committee, Audit Committee and Enterprise Risk Management Committee will each earn an additional $15,000 annual retainer, with the additional annual retainers remaining at $10,000 for the chairs of the Bank’s Finance Committee and Credit Committee, and the Lead Independent Director will receive an additional annual retainer of $30,000. The additional annual retainer paid

29

to members of the Executive Committee remains at $10,000. Each non-employee director will continue to earn a fee of $500 per committee meeting attended (or $250 in the case of short, telephonic meetings) for all committees other than the Executive Committee.

In each case, annual retainer fees (including the retainer for membership on the Executive Committee) are paid one-half in cash and one-half in fully vested stock, subject to any individual director’s election to receive more than 50% of such fees in stock (up to 100%). Meeting fees are paid in cash, subject to any individual director’s election to receive any portion of such fees in fully vested stock (up to 100%). Directors are also able to elect to receive some or all of their stock compensation in the form of fully vested deferred stock awards that are settled upon the termination of their service on the Board or at another future date of the Companydirector’s choosing. All fees are paid on a quarterly basis, and fees that are paid in fully vested stock or deferred stock awards are granted under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. The number of shares or deferred stock awards granted in 2020 was determined based on dividing the amount of fees to be paid by the per-share closing price of Company common stock on the last business day prior to grant. Beginning with the first quarter of 2021, these amounts will be determined based on the average price of the Company’s common stock over the prior 20 trading days. We believe this approach reduces volatility in award levels based on daily stock price fluctuations.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Principles of Corporate Governance contain stock ownership guidelines pursuant to which each non-executive director is expected to own at least three (3) times the annual retainer fee, valued at the closing price of the common stock on the date of acquisition, (the “Minimum Ownership Level”) at all times from and after the third anniversary of such director’s appointment or election to the Board until the end of such director’s service to the Company as a director. Directors are not required to acquire additional stock to increase their holdings to the Minimum Ownership Level in the event of a decline in the stock value. However, if a sale or other transfer from a director’s account results in the director owning less than the Minimum Ownership Level in shares of the Company’s common stock, the director is then required to re-establish his or her Minimum Ownership Level. Stock received by non-executive directors as part of their director compensation may be counted toward the accumulation of the Minimum Ownership Level. As of April 9, 2020, all directors who have been on the Board for three years or more are in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines, measured based on the annual retainer fee to be paid to directors in 2021.

Compensation for Employee Directors

Employee directors do not receive compensation for serving on our Board. Accordingly, Mark Mason, who has servedserves as chairman since March 2015,Chairman and is an executive of the Company, is not paid any additional retainer or compensation for his services as a director and chairman. Chairman.

30

We believe that our current overall non-employee director compensation program and the director compensation program in effect in 2015 are reasonable and appropriate based on our review of peer financial institution data and the data provided by our outside compensation consultants.
Prior to the end of the first fiscal quarter of 2015, only Messrs. Boggs, Chrisman, Ederer, Indiek, King and Kirk served as outside directors of HomeStreet Bank. Those directors received separate compensation for their service as directors of the Bank based on the director compensation policy of the Bank. Beginning in April 2015, all directors of the Company also serve as directors of the Bank and do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors or committee members of the Bank.
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan

In 1999, we adopted a plan to permit directors to defer all or a portion of their fees received for services as a director that would otherwise be payable in cash (with a minimum $2,500 deferral in a plan year for those who elect to make such deferrals). Interest earned on participant deferrals is equal to the average five year daily treasury rate for the quarter. A participant or his or her beneficiary will begin receiving a distribution of his or her deferrals for a particular plan year upon the earliest of (1)a future date specified by the participant, (2)the participant’s deathor (3)the date the participant ceases to be a director. The form of payment includes either a single lump sum payment or annual installment payments over a period of up to ten years. The participant has a limited ability to change these elections. This plan was suspended from 2008 through 2012 due to HomeStreet’s financial condition. As a result, none of our directors were participants in this plan for the year ended December 31, 2012. The plan was reintroduced on January 1, 2013; however, no directors participated in the plan for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 or 2015.

Compensation for Employee Directors
Employee directors do not receive compensation for serving on our Board of Directors.
2020 Director Compensation Table

The following table shows the compensation earned by or paid to, our non-employeenon-employee directors for 2015,2020, including Donald R. Voss, who joinedDavid A. Ederer, Thomas E. King and George “Judd” Kirk, each of whose terms on the Board expired in May 2020.

Name

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
(4)

 

Stock Awards ($)(5),(6)

 

All Other Compensation
($)
(7)

 

Total
($)

Scott M. Boggs

 

$

53,532

 

$

39,968

 

$

 

$

93,500

Sandra A. Cavanaugh

 

$

47,292

 

$

34,958

 

$

 

$

82,250

David A. Ederer(1)

 

$

1,849

 

$

33,326

 

$

1,806

 

$

35,175

Jeffrey A. Green(2)

 

$

21,977

 

$

15,393

 

$

 

$

37,370

Thomas E. King

 

$

18,993

 

$

11,626

 

$

 

$

30,620

George “Judd” Kirk

 

$

18,403

 

$

11,626

 

$

 

$

30,120

James R. Mitchell, Jr.

 

$

58

 

$

74,442

 

$

 

$

74,500

Mark R. Patterson

 

$

52,532

 

$

39,968

 

$

 

$

92,500

Nancy D. Pellegrino(3)

 

$

53

 

$

70,697

 

$

 

$

70,750

Douglas I. Smith

 

$

49

 

$

84,201

 

$

 

$

84,250

Donald R. Voss(1)

 

$

64,592

 

$

49,916

 

$

 

$

114,508

____________

(1)      Stock Award consists of fully vested deferred stock units that will be settled for shares of HomeStreet upon termination of service as a director. Mr. Ederer’s awards were settled in stock following his departure from the Board of Directors in March 2015, and Michael Malone, who resigned fromMay 2020.

(2)      Mr. Green joined the Board of Directors atin June 2020.

(3)      Mr. Mitchell joined the end of February 2015. This table includesBoard in January 2020.

(4)      The following directors elected to receive all compensation earned or paid to all directors who were on our Board of Directors during anya portion of 2015.




Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
Stock Awards
(4)(5)
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
All Other Compensation
($)
Total
($)
 
Scott M. Boggs58,25033,75092,000
Timothy R. Chrisman(1)
42,50023,750    66,250
David A. Ederer51,462.4526,25077,712.45
Victor H. Indiek49,00023,75072,750
Thomas E. King52,75025,00077,750
George “Judd” Kirk50,00022,50072,500
Michael J. Malone (2)
5,333.503,333.508,667
Douglas I. Smith45,00023,75068,750
Donald R. Voss (3)
40,91720,417    61,334
Bruce W. Williams37,00020,00057,000
(1)Does not include any compensation received by Chrisman & Company, an entity controlled by Mr. Chrisman. For more on the payments made to Chrisman & Company, please see the discussion in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.
(2)Mr. Malone resigned from the Board of Directors in February 2015.
(3)Mr. Voss joined the Board of Directors in March 2015.
(4)their cash fees in stock (either fully vested stock grants or fully vested deferred stock units): Mr. Ederer, $15,712; Mr. Mitchell: $44,000; Ms. Pellegrino, $40,250; and Mr. Smith, $48,750.

(5)      The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value for the stock awards granted in fiscal 2015, as determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). For details of all assumptions made in such calculations, see Note 16 to our financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

(5)2020.

(6)      Stock awards granted to non-employeenon-employee directors in fiscal 20152020 consist of (a) shares of common stock granted quarterly to our non-employeenon-employee directors as part of their individual annual retainer.retainer or (b) deferred stock units that settle on the earlier of a date chosen by the director electing to receive such deferred stock units or the date such director ceases service on the Board.

(7)      Consists of dividend equivalents paid on issuance of shares from deferred stock units upon retirement from the Board.

31



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The names of the executive officers and key employees of HomeStreet Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary HomeStreet Bank, their ages, their positions with the Company and theHomeStreet Bank and other biographical information as of April 21, 2016,9, 2021 are set forth below, except for the biographical information for Mr. Mason, which is included above under Proposal“Proposal 1 — Election of Directors.Directors” on page 10 of this Proxy Statement. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.


Name

Age

NameAge

Position at HomeStreet Inc.

Position at HomeStreet Bank

Mark K. Mason

56

61

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President

Melba Bartels

John M. Michel

54Senior

61

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Senior

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Richard W.H. Bennion66Executive Vice PresidentExecutive Vice President, Residential Construction and Affiliated Businesses
Rose Marie David52

William D. Endresen

 Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director
William D. Endresen61

66

 

Executive Vice President, Commercial Real Estate (Interim)and Commercial Capital President

Godfrey B. Evans

62

67

Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary

Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary

Susan Greenwald57

Erik D. Hand

 Senior

55

Executive Vice President, Single FamilyMortgage Lending Operations Director

Jay C. Iseman

Troy D. Harper

57

53

Executive Vice President, Chief RiskInformation Officer and Chief Credit Officer

Executive Vice President, Chief RiskInformation Officer and

Jay C. Iseman

61

Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer

Paulette Lemon60

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer

Paulette Lemon

65

Executive Vice President, Retail Banking Director

David H. Straus69

Darrell van Amen

 Senior Executive Vice President, Commercial Banking
Pamela J. Taylor

55

64Executive Vice President, Human Resources DirectorExecutive Vice President, Human Resources Director
Darrell van Amen50

Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer & Treasurer

Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer & Treasurer

Mary Vincent

62

Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer

Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer


Melba Bartels, SeniorJohn M. Michel, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.Officer of HomeStreet, Inc. and HomeStreet Bank.     Ms. BartelsMr. Michel joined HomeStreet in August of 2015May 2020 as our Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial OfficerOfficer. His duties include the management of treasury, financial reporting, management reporting, financial planning, and was promotedtax. Prior to Senior Executive Vice President in November 2015. Ms. Bartels was previously thejoining HomeStreet, Mr. Michel had over 25 years of experience as a chief financial officer or senior finance officer at financial institutions and specialty finance companies, including most recently as Chief Financial Officer of Auto and Student Lending at JPMorgan ChaseFirst Foundation, Inc., from December 2011 to June 2015.2007 through 2020. Prior to that, Ms. Bartels served as the Senior Vice President of Finance for Chase Auto Finance from June 2009 to December 2011. Ms. Bartelshis tenure in such roles, he was a senior manager at Deloitte, Haskin & Sells. Mr. Michel holds a Masters of Business Administration and a bachelor of scienceBA in Accounting from the University of Washington School of Business.

Richard W.H. Bennion, Executive Vice President of HomeStreet, Inc.; Executive Vice President, Residential Construction and Affiliated Businesses.Mr. Bennion joined HomeStreet in 1977 and currently serves as the Bank’s Executive Vice President and Residential Lending Director. He has been a member of the Fannie Mae Western Business Center Advisory Board since 2004, Chair of the Housing Partnership, a nonprofit organization, from 2001 to 2007 and a member of the University of Washington Tacoma Milgard School of Business Advisory Board since 2004. Mr. Bennion is the past director of the Homebuilders Association of Tacoma-Pierce County, the past director and president of Puget Sound Mortgage Lenders Association and Washington Mortgage Lenders Association. Mr. Bennion holds a bachelor’s degree in History and China Regional Studies from the University of Washington and a masters of business administration from the University of WashingtonNotre Dame and is a graduate of the School of Mortgage Banking.



Rose Marie David, Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director. Ms. David joined HomeStreet Bank in March 2012, coming from MetLife Home Loans where she was Pacific Northwest Regional Sales leader from 2011 to 2012 andNon-Producing Seattle District Manager from 2006 to 2011. She was promoted to Senior Vice President and Retail Mortgage Production Leader of HomeStreet Bank in August 2012, Executive Vice President for Single Family Lending in 2013 and Senior Executive Vice President for Single Family Lending in 2015. In that role, Ms. David is responsible for growing the residential mortgage banking franchise and oversees mortgage production, operations and servicing. Prior to working at MetLife Home Loans, she owned a mortgage brokerage for several years, moving to First Horizon with the sale of her brokerage. Ms. David holds a B.A. in finance from the University of Utah.
Certified Public Accountant — California (inactive).

William D. Endresen, Executive Vice President, Commercial Real Estate (Interim)and Commercial Capital President of HomeStreet Bank.    Mr. Endresen ishas been a 40-year veteran of the commercial lending industry whofor over 40 years. He joined HomeStreet Bank in in March 2015 as Executive Vice President of Commercial Real Estate and President of the HomeStreet Commercial Capital division offor HomeStreet Bank.  In April 2015, Mr. EndresenBank and was promoted to his current position (pending approval of the Federal National Mortgage Association in relation to our participation in the Designated Underwriting and Servicing Program)April 2016 to lead the combined commercial real estate lending and operation teams of theHomeStreet Bank. Prior to joining HomeStreet Bank, Mr. EndresenHe was founder and president of IMPAC Commercial Capital Corporation. He built IMPAC’s small balance commercial and multifamily lending program into a national platform with closings in 44 states. Mr. Endresen was also SVP Managing Director of Fidelity Federal Bank from 1999-20021999 to 2002 until the sale of the bank. Mr. Endresen foundedbank and wasthen returned to the position of president of IMPAC Commercial Capital Corporation from 2002 until 2015. In 1996, Mr. Endresen founded IMPAC Commercial Capital Corporation, a private company that originates small balance multifamily loans through brokers on a wholesale basis, and IMPAC Commercial Holdings, (publiclya publicly traded REIT)real estate investment trust, and he served as president of those entities from 1996 to 1999. Mr. Endresen studied business at Fullerton College.

Godfrey B. Evans, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary of HomeStreet, Inc. and the BankHomeStreet Bank..    Mr. Evans joined HomeStreet in November 2009 as Executive Vice President, General Counsel Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary. In March 2010, Mr. Evans was also named Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Evans is responsible for the delivery and management of all legal services to theHomeStreet Bank and the Company, administrative management oversight of (1) the Corporate and Real Estate Serviceand Facilities Group, Compliance(2) Risk and Regulatory Affairs Department (3) Human Resources and (4) the Community Relations Group. Mr. Evans has a

32

total of over 20 years of experience as a general counsel of public companies. Prior to joining the executive team at HomeStreet, Mr. Evans was the managing director of the bankruptcy and restructuring practice group at Marshall& Stevens beginning in 2008. Mr. Evans served as interim general counsel and chief restructuring officer for Chapeau, Inc., a cogeneration manufacturing company, from 2008 to 2009. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Evans served as a practicing attorney and as a project professional for Resources Global Professionals.Professionals, and from 1987 to 2002, served as executive vice president, chief administrative officer, general counsel and corporate secretary for Fidelity Federal Bank and its publicly traded holding companies, Bank Plus Corporation and Citadel Holding Corporation. Mr. Evans began his law practice at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP where he practiced from 1982 to 1987. Mr. Evans is admitted to practice law in California and in Washington, D.C. Mr. Evans holds a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in Architecturearchitecture from the University of California, Berkeley and a law degreejuris doctorate from Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

Susan C. Greenwald, SeniorErik D. Hand, Executive Vice President, Single Family OperationsMortgage Lending Director, of HomeStreet Bank.    Ms. GreenwaldMr. Hand joined theHomeStreet Bank in 19842019 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, Single Family Operationsthe bank’s executive vice president and Mortgage Lending Director. Ms. Greenwald began her career atIn his current role Mr. Hand leads the residential lending production, operations, and servicing areas for the bank. Prior to joining HomeStreet, Mr. Hand was president and chief executive officer of Penrith Home Loans, a mortgage joint venture between HomeStreet Bank as aand Windermere Real Estate with offices throughout the Pacific Northwest, from May 2011 to February 2019. Mr. Hand has been employed in the mortgage industry since 1988 and has extensive experience in loan production, operations, and secondary marketing assistantat both the executive and has served inoperations level. He is a numberpast board member of lending-related management roles. Ms. Greenwald has also served as a director and treasurer of Common Ground and a legislative and legal affairs committee member ofthe Seattle Mortgage Bankers Association which is now known(SMBA) and has served as the Washington Mortgage Lenders Association. Ms. Greenwald has been apast treasurer and board member of Washington Mortgage Lenders Association since approximately 1985the Outdoors for All Foundation. Mr. Hand studied political science at the University of Colorado.

Troy Harper, Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of HomeStreet, Inc. and HomeStreet Bank.    Mr. Harper joined HomeStreet Bank in our corporate information security department in 2013. He was promoted to Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer in June 2015 and further promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of the Company and HomeStreet Bank in November 2017. In his role as Chief Information Officer, Mr. Harper is an active participant on various industry committees. Sheresponsible for the delivery and management of Information Technology Services and Business Systems Support, Corporate Security and Corporate Information Security for the Company and HomeStreet Bank. In his 25 years of technology management for financial institutions, Mr. Harper worked for the FDIC, held CIO and divisional CIO roles for Pierce Commercial Bank and CGI Group, and provided management consulting and technology outsourcing services with Deloitte Consulting LLP. Mr. Harper holds a bachelor’s degree in Economicsfinance and accounting management from Southern Oregon State College.

Northeastern University.

Jay C. Iseman, Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer and Chief Credit Officer of HomeStreet, Inc. and theHomeStreet Bank.Mr. Iseman joined theHomeStreet Bank in August 2009 and currently serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Company and the Bank and, as ofHomeStreet Bank. From January 2016 through November 2017, Mr. Iseman also servesserved as Chief Risk Officer of the Company and theHomeStreet Bank. Prior to his current position and since joining the Company in 2009, Mr. Iseman has served as HomeStreet Bank’s Senior Vice President, Credit Administration and Vice President, Special Assets Group and OREO Group Manager and Income Property Credit Administrator. Mr. Iseman served as senior vice president and senior portfolio manager of commercial special assets with Strategic Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Bank of America between 2008 and 2009. Mr. Iseman holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administrationbusiness administration and Economicseconomics from Seattle Pacific University and a certificate of advanced study in International Financeinternational finance and Marketingmarketing from the Thunderbird School of Global Management.



Paulette Lemon, Executive Vice President, Retail Banking Director of theHomeStreet Bank.    Ms. Lemon joined theHomeStreet Bank in 1985. Prior to her promotion to Executive Vice President, Retail Banking Director of theHomeStreet Bank in 2015, Ms. Lemon served from 2001 as Senior Vice President, Retail Banking Director and as Vice President, Retail Bank Operations Manager prior to 2001. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administrationbusiness administration from Western Washington University and she graduated with honors from the National School of Banking through Fairfield University. She is also on the board of directors of Childhaven, a non-profitnon-profit organization.

David H. Straus, Senior Executive Vice President, Commercial Banking Director of the Bank. Mr. Straus, who has more than 40 years of banking experience, joined HomeStreet in November 2013. Before joining HomeStreet Bank, Mr. Straus founded Fortune Bank, a community bank headquartered in Seattle, in 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Straus held various executive leadership positions including President of Business Banking for Washington at Wells Fargo from 2003 to 2006 and President and Chief Operating Officer at Pacific Northwest Bank, a $3 billion commercial bank headquartered in Seattle, from 2002 to 2003. Prior to his experience at Pacific Northwest Bank and Wells Fargo, Mr. Straus also served in multiple leadership roles at First Interstate and Old National Bank/U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Straus is a past Chairman of the Washington Bankers Association and formerly served as a member of the board of United Way of King County. He is the past board chairman of Pioneer Human Services, past president of Risk Management Associates and past board member of the Boys and Girls Club of King County. Mr. Straus is a graduate of University of Denver and received a Master of Business Administration from the University of Arizona. In addition, he is a graduate of Pacific Coast Banking School and Leadership Tomorrow of King County.
Pamela J. Taylor, Executive Vice President, Human Resources Director. Ms. Taylor joined the Bank in 1998 as Senior Vice President and Human Resources Director and was promoted to Executive Vice President and Human Resources Director of both the Bank and the Company in 2015. She holds a senior professional human resource certification from the Society for Human Resource Management and a bachelor’s degree in English from California State University, Northridge. Prior to joining HomeStreet, Ms. Taylor served as Executive Vice President, Human Resource Director for MetLife Capital Corporation from 1986 to 1998. Ms. Taylor is an advisory board member for the Seattle American Cancer Society, and a past member of the following organizations: Human Resource committee of the board of the YMCA, University of Washington Extension Program Advisory Committee, Board of the University of Washington Executive Development Program and curriculum committee for Leadership Tomorrow.

Darrell van Amen, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of HomeStreet, Inc. andthe HomeStreet Bank.    Mr. van Amen joined theHomeStreet Bank in 2003 and currently servessince 2010 has served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of theHomeStreet Bank as welland since 2012 as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of the Company, a position he assumed in 2012.Company. Prior to his current position with theHomeStreet Bank, he was the Vice President, Asset/Liability Manager and Treasurer of theHomeStreet Bank and the Company from 2003 to 2010. Mr. van Amen is also a director of Habitat for Humanity.Humanity Seattle/King County and serves on the Seattle University Advisory Board. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Economicseconomics from Weber State University and a master’s degree in Economicseconomics from Claremont Graduate University.

33

Mary Vincent, Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer of HomeStreet, Inc. and HomeStreet Bank.    

The current termsMs. Vincent joined HomeStreet Bank in 1987 and in November 2017 became Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer of both the Company and HomeStreet Bank in 2012. Ms. Vincent has held numerous senior-level risk-management-related positions at HomeStreet Bank, including Compliance Officer, Bank Secrecy Act Officer and most recently Senior Vice President, Compliance and Regulatory Affairs Director, a position that she held from 2012 until her promotion to Chief Risk Officer. Prior to joining HomeStreet, Ms. Vincent worked for six years in regulatory examination and supervision with several regulatory agencies. She is a member of the Seattle chapter of the Risk Management Association and a past officer and finance committee chair of Soroptimists International of Seattle. Ms. Vincent holds a bachelor’s degree in finance from the University of Washington and is a graduate of the Pacific Coast Banking School.

34

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Introduction

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain individuals with the skills and qualifications to manage and lead the Company effectively. The overarching goal of our program is to motivate our leaders to contribute to the achievement of our financial goals and to focus on long-term value creation for our shareholders.

In this Compensation Disclosure & Analysis (“CD&A”), we review the objectives and elements of the Company’s executive compensation program and discuss the 2020 compensation earned by our named executive officers listed below (“NEOs”). It also describes the process followed by the HRCG Committee for making pay decisions, as well as its rationale for specific decisions related to 2020.

2020 Named Executive Officers

Name

Title

Mark K. Mason

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Mark R. Ruh(1)

Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

John M. Michel(1)

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Darrell van Amen

Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer

Erik D. Hand

Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director

William Endresen

Executive Vice President, Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Capital President

____________

(1)      Mr. Ruh served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer until May 8, 2020. Mr. Michel was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer on May 11, 2020.

Executive Summary

2020 Business Highlights

2020 began as a continuation of the work that was begun in 2019 with our efficiency and profitability improvement initiative. We anticipated a year of incremental improvement resulting from the significant strategic changes of prior years’ restructuring and M&A activity. However, by February the company was facing the unprecedented demands of managing through the COVID-19 global pandemic. We reacted quickly and decisively, requiring most of our employees to work remotely, establishing additional sanitation and distancing policies and procedures, supplying all of our offices with additional personal protective equipment (“PPE”), restricting our branches to appointment only in order to manage the amount of foot traffic, rolling out government sponsored assistance programs such as the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), and instituting increased employee communication with weekly calls hosted by Mark Mason. These changes in protocols were to ensure that the company would be able to continue to serve our customers and communities with minimal disruption.

We immediately reduced new lending risk overall and stopped lending in the hardest hit industries while working with our commercial borrowers directly impacted by the pandemic. This resulted in many requests for forbearance being denied due to the borrower having the financial wherewithal to support ongoing loan payments and offering forbearance or modifications to loan terms only when necessary. Many of these positive results stem from our culture of maintaining strict credit standards, building a diversified loan portfolio, and staying away from historically risky businesses. Our planned real estate related savings were not fully realized due in large part to the effects of the pandemic on the sublease market. However, extraordinary charges taken during 2020, including additional charges against reduced office space due to lower occupancy needs resulting from ongoing remote work, will expirerealize substantial benefits in 2021 and going forward.

Despite the challenges presented by the global pandemic, we benefited from our diversified business model, our conservatively underwritten loan portfolio, and the steadfast commitment of our employees. The low interest rate environment contributed to an improvement in our net interest margin, increasing from 3.05% in 2019 to 3.13% in 2020 as our interest-bearing liabilities decreased more than the decrease in the yield of our interest earning assets. We also benefitted from high loan volume and profitability in our single-family mortgage banking business and we had

35

record origination volumes of commercial real estate loans and higher volumes of commercial real estate loan sales. These increased revenues, along with the benefits of our efficiency and profitability improvement project resulted in meaningful improvement in our profitability and our efficiency.

In discussing our second quarter 2019 results, we shared guidance with the capital markets for expectations to be achieved for the third quarter of 2020, based on earnings and cost savings estimates we developed, with the caveat that such savings will be influenced by the economic environment and accuracy of consultant estimates. These expectations were:

•        Core Return on Average Assets (“ROAA”) greater than 1.10%

•        Core Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (“ROATCE”) greater than 11%

•        Efficiency ratio in the low 60% range

Despite the adverse impacts of the pandemic on our communities and business, our core results for the third quarter of 2020 surpassed these targets:

•        ROAA was 1.40%; Core ROAA was 1.50%

•        Return on Average Equity (“ROE”) was 14.6%; Core ROTCE was 16.6%

•        Efficiency ratio was 59.9%

Our fourth quarter 2020 our results continued this strong performance:

•        ROAA was 1.47%; Core ROAA was 1.73%

•        ROE was 15.3%; Core ROTCE was 19.0 %

•        Efficiency ratio was 56.1%

Our full year 2020 our results also exceeded our prior year guidance despite the effects of the pandemic:

•        ROAA was 1.10%; Core ROAA was 1.23%

•        ROE was 11.3%; Core ROTCE was 13.4%

•        Efficiency ratio was 61.4%

For purposes of computing the above core ratios and efficiency ratios, certain nonrecurring charges primarily related to our discontinued operations and restructuring activities revenues and expenses were excluded. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP ratios to the comparable GAAP results, where calculable, is included in Appendix A to this proxy statement.

Our performance during the year, response to the COVID pandemic, and competitive advantages relative to the business environment resulted in outperformance of HomeStreet’s share price compared to the industry. HomeStreet’s total shareholder return for 2020 was 1.4% compared to the total return for the KBW Regional Bank Index (“KRX”) of -8.7%. This return was aided by the commencement of a regular quarterly common dividend during 2020 totaling $0.60 per share during the year, and share repurchase activity. We repurchased 2.2 million shares during 2020, or 9.2% of total shares outstanding, at such timean average price per share of $26.31, compared to our tangible book value per share of $31.42 as their successors are elected.of December 31, 2020.

2020 Financial Highlights

•        Net income from continuing operations for 2020 was $80.0 million, a 96% increase over 2019.

•        Core net income for 2020 was $88.8 million, a 100% increase from 2019.

•        Return on average equity and return on average tangible common equity (“ROATCE”) for 2020 of 11.3% and 12.1%, respectively.

•        Core ROATCE for 2020 of 13.4%.

36



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We are an “Emerging Growth Company,” as

•        Prudent Capital Management: During 2020, we maintained our regulatory capital ratios above the minimums required to be considered “Well Capitalized” (as defined in the JumpstartFederal Deposit Insurance Act prompt corrective active regulations, to which we are subject) at both the Company and at HomeStreet Bank. At December 31, 2019, our capital ratios were:

•        Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 14.00% and 14.76% at the Company and HomeStreet Bank, respectively; and

•        Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 9.65% and 9.79% at the Company and HomeStreet Bank, respectively.

•        Book value per share and tangible book value per share increased from $28.45 and $27.02, respectively at December 31, 2019 to $32.93 and $31.42, respectively, at December 31, 2020.

2020 Executive Compensation Highlights

The HRCG Committee made the following executive compensation decisions for fiscal 2020:

•        Base Salaries: Base salaries were reviewed for all NEOs in February 2020 as part of our annual enterprise-wide performance review process. Mr. van Amen and Mr. Hand each received a base salary adjustment of 2% in March 2020, Mr. Mason received a 10% increase in November 2020 and Mr. Endresen received a 19% increase in March 2020. Mr. Ruh and Mr. Michel did not receive an increase in 2020. The resulting average increase in base salary for the top 5 NEOs was 6.6%. For a full explanation of the decisions related to base salary increases, please see page 43 of this Proxy Statement.

•        2020 Annual Incentives: We maintain a short-term, cash-based incentive plan for non-commissioned officers called the Annual Incentive Plan. Based on our 2020 financial performance, the corporate component of the Annual Incentive Plan attained 137.2% of target performance, which resulted in an above target payout for that component of the Annual Incentive Plan. Our Business Startups Act,commissioned NEOs are eligible for incentive awards under separate arrangements, as discussed below. For details about payouts, please see page 43 of this Proxy Statement.

•        Long Term Incentives: In 2020, the NEOs received long-term incentive awards in the form of 50% time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and 50% performance-based share units (“PSUs”). None of the PSUs for the performance period 2018-2020 vested or “JOBS Act”paid out due to the Company not achieving threshold performance. Following our shareholder engagement discussions in the fall of 2018, the HRCG Committee determined that a performance goal of total shareholder return would better align the incentives tied to the PSUs with long-term shareholder value. This new performance metric was used for PSUs starting in 2019, for the performance measurement period of 2019-2021, and are eligiblecontinued to take advantagebe used in 2020 and 2021. For details about long term incentive awards, please see page 48 of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not Emerging Growth Companies. These include, but are not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regardingthis Proxy Statement.

2020 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Approximately 97.7% of the votes cast (for and against) were voted in favor of our named executive compensation in our proxy statements, including the requirement to include a specific form of Compensation Discussion and Analysis, as well as exemptions from certain requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act, including the requirement to hold a non-binding advisory voteofficer compensation. Based on executive compensationthis high approval rating and the requirement to obtain stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We have elected to comply with the scaled disclosure requirements applicable to Emerging Growth Companies.

Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy
We believe it is critical to the Company’s success to attract, retain and incentivize highly qualified executives and to promote a high-performance culture. We have therefore adopted compensation policies thatfeedback we received from our investors generally in 2020, we believe reward executives for achieving and maintaining short- and long-term performance that builds shareholder value. The principles underlyingour shareholders are supportive of our executive compensation program. We did not make any material changes to the program in 2020.

37

Summary of Executive Compensation Practices

Our executive compensation program includes the following practices and policies, which we believe promote sound compensation governance and programs include:

provide levelsare in the best interests of our shareholders and NEOs:

Compensation Philosophy and Practices

Our executive compensation competitive with those offered by our peers and competitors and consistent with our level of performance;

attract and retainprogram is designed to achieve the most qualified and experienced individuals available to further our success;
alignfollowing objectives:

•        Align the interests of executives and shareholders by linking a significant portion of an executive’sexecutive compensation to the Company’s short-short-term and long-termlong-term financial performance; and

rewardperformance.

•        Reward and motivate appropriate executive behavior that produces strong financial results, while managing risks and promoting regulatory compliance.

This philosophy pertains

•        Attract and retain the most qualified and experienced individuals available to further the Company’s success.

•        Provide levels of compensation competitive with those offered by our peers and competitors which are consistent with the Company’s level of performance.

These objectives serve to assure our long-term success and are built on the following compensation principles:

•        Executive compensation is managed from a total compensation perspective (i.e., base salary, short- and long-term incentives, and retirement are reviewed together).

•        All elements of compensation are compared to the total compensation packages of a comparator peer group, which includes banks of similar assets and business lines.

•        In addition to comparator peer group information, each NEO’s experience level, skills, scope of responsibility and performance is factored into the decision for compensation.

Elements of the Executive Compensation Program

The three main elements of the Company’s executive compensation program are base salary, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives, each of which is described below:

Compensation Element

Fixed or At-Risk

Frequency

Cash or Equity

Purpose

Key Feature

Base Salary

Fixed

Annual

Cash

To attract and retain the best talent and recognize individual talent

Reviewed against individual’s level of skill, experience and responsibilities and market data from a group of similarly sized industry peers

Short-term incentives:

Annual Incentive Plan Award (non-commissioned officers only)

At-Risk

Annual

Cash

To motivate performance to meet near-term goals

Earned based on 50% corporate results (80% for CEO) and 50% individual results (20% for CEO), or 50% business unit results and 50% individual results.

Commission Awards

At-Risk

Annual

Cash

To incentivize key business leaders to generate profitable quality loans for HomeStreet Bank

Short-term commissions are earned based on loan volume and profitability along with loan quality metrics. Earned by commissioned NEOs in lieu of Annual Incentive Plan Awards.

38

Compensation Element

Fixed or At-Risk

Frequency

Cash or Equity

Purpose

Key Feature

Long-term incentives:

PSUs

At-Risk

Annual

Equity

Motivates and incentivizes sustained performance over the longer term that is comparable to or exceeds our peer group

Total annual long-term incentive award is 50% PSUs measured over three years against a performance goal set at the beginning of the performance period.

RSUs

At-Risk

Annual

Equity

Aligns interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders as the value of RSUs is contingent on our stock price. Also supports our leadership retention objectives.

Total annual long-term incentive award is 50% RSUs, which vest ratably over three years, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

Total Direct Compensation

The charts below show the target and maximum total direct compensation of our CEO, non-commissioned NEO’s and commissioned NEOs for fiscal year 2020. These charts illustrate that a significant portion of target total direct compensation is performance or at-risk based (60% for our CEO and an average of 52% for our non-commissioned NEOs and 76% for our commissioned NEOs).

2020 compensation mix for our CEO is shown below.

39

2020 compensation mix for our Non-Commissioned NEOs (Mr. Michel and Mr. van Amen) is shown below.

And 2020 compensation mix for our Commissioned NEOs (Mr. Endresen and Mr. Hand) is shown below.

40

The Decision-Making Process

Role of the HRCG Committee. The HRCG Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The HRCG Committee works very closely with its independent consultant and management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. Details of the HRCG Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in the HRCG Committee’s charter, which may be accessed at our website, www.homestreet.com.

Pearl Meyer, acting as wellthe Company’s independent, external compensation consultant, provides peer market data to the HRCG Committee as employeerequested to evaluate the annual compensation atof our NEOs. The Committee reviews and approves recommendations from the CEO for the other NEOs compensation and reviews the elements of CEO compensation in executive session. At the HRCG Committee’s request, the HR Director may attend the executive session to answer questions from the HRCG Committee. The HRCG Committee makes all other levels throughoutfinal compensation and equity award decisions regarding our organization.

NotwithstandingNEOs except for the CEO, whose compensation is determined by the independent members of the full Board, based upon recommendations of the HRCG Committee.

Role of the CEO

The CEO does not provide recommendations concerning his own compensation, nor is he present during discussions of the HRCG Committee concerning his own compensation.

The following recommendations are made to the HRCG Committee by the CEO for each NEO, which is assessed alongside peer market data and trends provided by Pearl Meyer:

•        Base salary adjustments, taking into account the NEO’s individual performance and role within the Company and comparator peer group data.

•        Performance metrics and award schedule for short-term opportunities under our overall compensation objectives,Annual Incentive Plan and commission plans, with performance targets being set relative to the projected business cycle and strategic business plan.

•        Long-term incentive compensation opportunities forawards, including developing and providing specific individuals may vary basedrecommendations on athe types of awards to be granted annually, the performance measures, threshold, target and maximum performance metrics of such awards and the aggregate number of factors, including competingshares to be awarded.

Use of Independent Consultants and Advisors

The HRCG Committee continued to engage Pearl Meyer as its independent, external compensation consultant during 2020. Pearl Meyer provides executive and board compensation consulting services to the HRCG Committee and does not provide any other services to the Company. The HRCG Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to the SEC and Nasdaq rules, and the Company concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work for the HRCG Committee did not raise any conflict of interest. The primary responsibilities of the independent, external compensation consultant were to:

•        Provide the HRCG Committee with independent and objective market data;

•        Conduct a Board compensation analysis;

•        Conduct compensation analysis for NEOs;

•        Provide assistance in reviewing the CD&A;

•        Review incentive plan design and changes;

•        Provide advice on compensation strategy and potential risks associated with compensation plan designs; and

•        Review and advise on pay programs available for similar positions, scope of duties, tenure, specialized experience, institutional knowledge and performance. We believe a portion of each executive’s potential compensation should be tied to individual performancepay levels.

These services are provided as evaluatedrequested by the HRCG Committee throughout the year.

41

The Role of Benchmarking and Market Data

The companies comprising the Chief Executive Officer (other than for our Chief Executive Officer, whose performance is evaluated solelycomparator peer group are reviewed and selected annually by the HRCG Committee). In addition, we believe a meaningful portion of each executive’s totalCommittee to assess continued relevance, with data provided to the HRCG Committee by the independent, external compensation opportunity should be linked to our long-term company-wide goals of safety and soundness, increased shareholder value and risk management. Actual compensation in a given year will vary from the target compensation levels based primarily on the attainment of operating goals, the Company’s overall performance, and changes in shareholder value. In some instances, the amount and structure of compensation results from arm’s-length negotiations with executives, which terms reflect an increasingly competitive market for proven expertise and managerial talent. We design our compensation programs and make individual pay decisions and adjustments in the context of this philosophy.

Decision Making and Policy Making
consultant. The HRCG Committee targets between 15 and 20 companies for the Company’s comparator peer group. The companies comprising the comparator peer group are selected based on the following considerations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019:

•        Size Characteristics:

•        Assets: ½ to 2.5 times HomeStreet

•        Total revenues: ½ to 2.5 times HomeStreet

•        Select banks such that HomeStreet is responsible for settingpositioned reasonably among the policiespeers when balancing the above criteria

•        Geography:

•        Preference given to companies in the Western United States

•        Consideration of banks further east if their size and compensation levelsbusiness model characteristics are compelling

•        Operations:

•        Generally, a reasonably similar loan mix and ratio of non-interest income to operating revenue, compared to HomeStreet

In 2019, the HRCG evaluated our comparator peer group and adjusted the group used for our directors2019 compensation review in order to reflect certain consolidations within the industry. Within the Company, we use certain other peer groups for financial and Named Executive Officers and for determiningregulatory reporting purposes which differ from the peer group we us to evaluate compensation, as regulatory requirements may cause us to include peers who are outside of our Chief Executive Officer. See “Corporate Governance-Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee.” Certain membersregion or whose operations are not overall comparable to ours in order to provide a more targeted peer group for that purpose. The average total assets of senior management, includingour peer group as of December 31, 2019 was $9.7 billion compared with our total assets as of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, and General Counsel regularly participate insame date of $6.8 billion. The comparator group approved by the HRCG and used for our 2020 compensation review consisted of the following companies:

Banc of California, Inc.

Heritage Commerce Corp.

Banner Corporation

Heritage Financial Corporation

Central Pacific Financial Corp.

Luther Burbank Corporation

Columbia Banking System, Inc.

Opus Bank

CVB Financial Corp.

Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc.

First Foundation, Inc.

TriCo Bancshares

First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.

Washington Federal, Inc.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc.

The HRCG Committee processestablishes base salaries, short-term cash incentive awards, and long-term, equity-based incentive awards on a case-by-case basis for compensating Named Executive Officers. Executive officers in attendance may provide their insightseach NEO taking into account, among other things, individual and suggestions, but only independent committee members may vote on decisions regarding executiveCompany performance, length of service, market data, advancement potential, recruiting needs, internal equity, retention requirements, unrealized equity gains, succession planning and current compensation and executive officers are excluded from deliberations regarding their own compensation. In particular, the Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations relating to other executive officers; however, aftergovernance practices. While the HRCG Committee reviews and discusses the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation



with him, final deliberationsboth peer data and, all votes regarding his compensation are made in executive session, without the Chief Executive Officer present. The committee also ordinarily reviews recommendations and input from compensation consultants regarding executive officers’ compensation. Participation levels in all incentive programs for our Chief Executive Officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers (collectively referred to as the “Named Executive Officers”) are establishedsome cases, survey data compiled by the HRCG Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year. These participation levels may be increased or decreased after the beginning of a fiscal year at the discretion of the committee. However, it has been the practice ofCommittee’s outside compensation consultant, the HRCG Committee does not target individual compensation to do so only in the eventspecific target percentiles of our peer group.

42

2020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Base Salary

Base salary represents annual fixed compensation and is a material change in anstandard element of compensation necessary to attract and retain executive officer’s responsibilities.leadership talent. In establishing incentive plan participation levels,making base salary decisions, the HRCG Committee considers market data relating to compensation practice of our peersthe CEO’s recommendations, as well as internal parity. We do not follow formal guidelines for establishing internal parity, but we do seek to correlate organizationaleach NEO’s position and level of responsibility with participation level.

Summary Componentswithin the Company. The HRCG Committee takes into account factors such as relevant market data, individual performance and contributions, and length of Compensation
Currently,service. The HRCG Committee determined the compensation package for our Named Executive Officers is comprised ofappropriate annual base salary an annual short-term cash incentive plan, equity opportunity awards, a 401(k) plan, health and welfare benefits plan and perquisites.
Base Salary
Base salaries are providedrate for each Named Executive Officer for performing specific job responsibilities, giving considerationNEO as follows:

Name

 

2019 Base Salary

 

2020 Base Salary

 

%
Adjustment

Mark K. Mason(1)

 

$

700,000

 

$

775,000

 

10%

Mark K. Ruh(2)

 

$

321,300

 

$

321,300

 

—%

John M. Michel(3)

 

$

 

$

435,000

 

—%

Darrell van Amen(4)

 

$

345,490

 

$

352,400

 

2%

Erik Hand

 

$

240,000

 

$

244,800

 

2%

William Endresen(5)

 

$

315,000

 

$

375,000

 

19%

____________

(1)      Mr. Mason’s base salary was increased from $700,000 per year to $775,000 per year effective November 1, 2020. Given Mr. Mason’s total remuneration compared to market, the Company’s recent performance and the date of Mr. Mason’s last increase, which was in 2017, the HRCG Committee determined an approximate 10% increase was warranted.

(2)      Mr. Ruh did not receive a merit increase in 2020 given his departure from the Company in May 2020.

(3)      Mr. Michel joined the Company in May 2020.

(4)      Mr. van Amen received a 2% merit increase commensurate with his performance, pay relative to other executives within the organization and market data reviewed.

(5)      As part of the review of Mr. Endresen’s compensation, the HRCG Committee made adjustments to the knowledge, skills, abilities and experiencecomponents of each executivehis pay as well as competitive marketthe level of his pay. Mr. Mason’s base compensation was $500,000 for 2014 and $550,000 for 2015. Ms. David earned aHis base salary increase reflects changes to his pay mix based on comparable market data and his performance, which resulted in increased production and profitability for his business unit.

Annual Cash Incentives

All of $200,000 per annum for each of 2014 and 2015. Ms. Bartels received a base salary of $325,000 per year upon her hire date in August 2015.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation
HomeStreet maintains the Performance-Based Annual Incentive Plan (the “Annual Incentive Plan”)our NEOs are eligible to provide employees withreceive incentive awards, upon the attainment of pre-defined annual performancewhich are intended to focus executives on short-term financial and strategic goals that are designed to aligncontribute to long-term value.

The non-commissioned NEOs are eligible employees with the short-term objectives of HomeStreet. Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartelsto participate in the Annual Incentive Plan. Ms. David participates inPlan, which provides an opportunity to receive an annual incentive compensation planaward that is different from thecontingent on achieving pre-defined annual corporate objectives, as well as individual goals which target their respective areas of responsibility. Commissioned NEOs are eligible for annual incentive awards under separate arrangements, which provide for payout opportunities based on their respective business units’ performance results.

Non-Commissioned Incentive Plan Awards

The Annual Incentive Plan provided our non-commissioned NEOs with the opportunity to earn a performance-based annual cash incentive award. Actual bonus payouts depend on the achievement of pre-established performance objectives and is described in greater detail below.

Each eligible participant in the Annual Incentive Plan is assignedcan range from 0% to 150% of target and maximumaward amounts.

43

Target annual incentive award opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary. The specific levelsalary and range of opportunities varies by individual, and reflects each participant’s past and expected future contributions to the success of HomeStreet, as well as market-competitive opportunities for employees with similar skills, experience and responsibilities at companies comparable to HomeStreet. The 2014 target incentive opportunity was 75% of base salary for Mr. Mason, and 20% to 40% for other executive officer participants. The maximum incentive opportunity in 2014 was 150% of target. Therefore, the maximum incentive opportunity was 112.5% for Mr. Mason and 30% to 60% for other executive officer participants. Ms. Bartels was not hired until 2015 and therefore did not participate in the plan in 2014. The 2015 target incentive opportunity was 75% of base salary for Mr. Mason, 50% for Ms. Bartels, and 20% to 45% for other participants with a title of senior vice president or above. The maximum incentive opportunity in 2015 was 150% of target. Therefore, the maximum incentive opportunity as a percentage of base salary was 112.5% for Mr. Mason, 75% for Ms. Bartels, and 30% to 67.5% for other participants with a title of senior vice president or above.

Pre-defined corporate, department and/or individual performance goals are assigned to each participant and weighted according to the importance of Company or Department’s strategies. Corporate performance goals are established each year by the HRCG Committee, with input from our Chief Executive Officer. Individual goals for Mr. Mason arewere established by the HRCG Committee based on the NEO’s level of responsibility and departmenthis or her ability to impact overall results. The HRCG Committee also considers comparable market data in setting target award amounts. The 2020 target award opportunities in terms of percentage of salary for the non-commissioned NEOs continuing their employment with the Company throughout 2020 were the same as their target award opportunities for 2019, and were as follows:

Non-Commissioned NEO

Target Opportunity as % of Base Salary

Mark K. Mason

75%

John M. Michel

60%

Darrell van Amen

45%

Mark R. Ruh(1)

45%

____________

(1)      Mr. Ruh’s target opportunity was established at the beginning of the year; he became ineligible to earn an incentive award upon his separation from the Company in June 2020.

Actual awards for the CEO are assessed by the HRCG Committee based on his performance against corporate financial goals and his individual goalsperformance. Actual awards for the other executive officer participantsNEOs are establishedbased on the achievement of corporate or business unit financial goals and individual performance objectives as assessed and recommended by Mr. Masonthe CEO and approved by the HRCG Committee.

For 2020, the Compensation Committee established the following balance between corporate and individual goals:

Non-Commissioned NEO

 

Corporate
Goals Weight

 

Individual
Goals Weight

Mark K. Mason(1)

 

80%

 

20%

John M. Michel

 

50%

 

50%

Darrell van Amen

 

50%

 

50%

Mark R. Ruh(2)

 

50%

 

50%

____________

(1)      Mr. Mason’s corporate goal achievements are more heavily weighted because he is responsible for Company2015-wide results as CEO. The other NEOs have a more limited ability to impact certain corporate goals, especially those that are based on segment-level results such as ROTE for Commercial and Consumer Lending, mortgage loan volume or credit quality.

(2)      Mr. Ruh’s goals were established at the beginning of the year but were not measured as he became ineligible to earn an incentive award upon his separation from the Company in June 2020.

Corporate Performance Goals, Metrics and Actual Results for Mr. Mason: Mr. Mason serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

At the beginning of HomeStreet, Inc.each plan year, the HRCG Committee approves the corporate financial measures and the Bank.



Mr. Mason’s 2015 incentive opportunity was weighted 80% to corporate goals and 20% to individual goals. The corporate performance goals (80% of total) established for Mr. Mason included threshold, target and stretch performancemaximum goals for mortgagethe Plan. The 2020 financial performance metrics were chosen to be in alignment with our 2020-2022 Strategic Plan as approved by the Board. The measures were designed to support our continuing efforts in increasing our financial strength. We use core results to more accurately measure management’s performance against our operating plan. Core results adjust our actual results for nonrecurring revenue and expense items such as certain nonrecurring charges primarily related to our discontinued operations and restructuring activities revenues and expenses. Below are the performance measures used for 2020:

•        Core ROAA:    ROAA means return on equity (27.5% weight), commercial and consumeraverage assets, which is defined as core net income as a percentage of total average assets

•        Core ROATCE:��   ROATCE means return on average tangible common equity, (27.5% weight),which is defined as core net income as a percentage of average tangible common equity. Tangible common equity is determined by removing goodwill and identifiable intangible assets (other than loan servicing rights) from shareholders’ equity. If Core ROATCE of 11% was not achieved, payout would be limited to target.

44

•        Core Efficiency Ratio:    Defined as Core Noninterest (NIE) expense (NIE less certain nonrecurring charges primarily related to our discontinued operations and restructuring activities expenses and any other expenses classified as non-core) as a percentage of net interest income (fully taxable equivalent, if available) and noninterest revenues excluding any nonrecurring revenue items related to our discontinued operations and restructuring activities revenues.

•        Nonperforming assets to Total Assets:    This is considered a key measure of the quality of HomeStreet Bank’s loan portfolio. Calculated by taking the ending value of nonperforming loans plus REO and dividing by total assets (10% weight),assets. The lower the ratio is, the better the result. Credit risk management remains a major focus of HomeStreet Bank so that management takes a balanced approach to growth, with an appropriate risk/return profile.

•        Core Deposit Growth:    Growing core deposits is an important strategy to improve our deposit growth (15% weight)mix and non-single family loan origination (20% weight). The individual goals (20% of total) established for Mr. Mason were related to diversification of revenue, profitabilitysupport asset growth. Increasing core deposits supports the reduction of our mortgage banking segment, audit process improvementsproportion of alternative funding and completionhelps us to manage funding costs. Core deposits includes demand deposit, savings, and money market account deposits and excludes time deposits (CDs), servicing deposits, brokered deposits, and other wholesale deposits. Excludes deposits added through M&A in the year of certain acquisition goals. Individual goals for Mr. Mason were not assigned specific weights in 2015.

the acquisition year’s performance measurement. Growth is calculated as the change from the 4Q average of prior year to 4Q average of current year.

The following table summarizes Mr. Mason’s 2015shows the performance measures, assigned weights, and 2020 results, for the corporate component of the Annual Incentive Plan. Final corporate measures resulted in an above target achievement of 137.2%.

2020 Performance Measures

 

Weight

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Results

 

% of Target Achievement

 

Weighted Achievement as % of
Target

Core ROAA(1)

 

20.0

%

 

0.68

%

 

0.84

%

 

1.30

%

 

1.23

%

 

142.4

%

 

28.5

%

Core ROATCE(1)

 

30.0

%

 

7.6

%

 

9.5

%

 

15.0

%

 

13.2

%

 

133.8

%

 

40.1

%

Efficiency Ratio(1)

 

20.0

%

 

80.0

%

 

73.5

%

 

55.0

%

 

62.6

%

 

129.4

%

 

25.9

%

NPA’s/Total Assets(2)

 

10.0

%

 

0.45

%

 

0.38

%

 

0.25

%

 

0.31

%

 

126.9

%

 

12.7

%

Core Deposit Growth

 

20.0

%

 

7.0

%

 

9.2

%

 

12.0

%

 

23.5

%

 

150.0

%

 

30.0

%

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Achievement as a % of
Target(3)

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

137.2

%

____________

(1)      Non-GAAP financial measure. Please see Appendix A for a reconciliation with the most comparable GAAP financial measure.

(2)      Calculated by taking the ending value of the sum of nonperforming loans and other real estate owned assets divided by HomeStreet Bank’s total assets.

(3)      Core ROATCE exceeded 11.00% therefore payment was not limited to 100%.

Corporate performance results between threshold and target and between target and maximum are calculated on a straight-line interpolation basis. Annual incentive awards are calculated based on actual performance as compared to the goals as establisheddescribed above. The HRCG Committee has the discretion to reduce or increase the payouts to the extent it determines appropriate to reflect the business environment and market conditions that may affect HomeStreet’s financial and stock price performance. No such discretion was exercised by the HRCG Committee and actual results for 2015:


Corporate Performance AreaWeightCorporate Performance GoalsActual ResultPayout
Threshold
(50% of Target Payout)
TargetMaximum
(150% of Target Payout)
Mortgage Return on Equity (%)27.5%10.00%24.50%36.75%24.29%
$90,093
Commercial & Consumer Return on Equity (%)27.5%7.30%9.40%14.10%7.31%
$45,591
Classified Assets to Total Assets (%)10%2.00%1.00%0.80%0.55%
$49,500
Core Deposit Growth (%)15%5.00%10.00%15.00%4.50%
$0.00
Non-Single Family Loan Originations (Millions) ($)20%$972.0$1,373.0$1,650.0$1,540
$85,895
Corporate: (80% Total Weight)     
$271,079

Individual Performance AreaWeightIndividual Performance Goals  
Far Below TargetBelow TargetTargetExceeds TargetActual ResultsPayout
Individual: (20% Total Weight)
100%0.00%7.50%15.00%22.50%15.00%$82,500
The HRCG Committee determined that Mr. Mason performedpayouts earned in 2020.

Individual performance goals.

Individual performance goals are established at target for histhe beginning of each plan year. An NEO’s individual goals for 2015, which is 20% of his total incentive. Therefore, Mr. Mason received a payout of $82,500 for his individual goals. With respectmay relate to responsibilities, projects and initiatives specific to the executive’s business or function that are not covered in the corporate performance measurements.

To assess individual performance against the goals, the HRCG Committee selected qualitative goals for the CEO tied to key strategic initiatives that are aligned with the Company’s 2020-2022 Strategic Plan as approved by the Board, as well as his responsibility in the areas of profitability, diversification, business growth and credit quality

45

as such areas correlate to the 2020-2022 Strategic Plan. Similarly, the CEO recommended qualitative goals for the other non-commissioned NEOs based on the specific department and business goals that support the Company’s 2020 – 2022 Strategic Plan, which were adopted by the HRCG Committee.

Mr. Mason, mortgage return on equity and commercial and consumer return on equity were below target, but above threshold. Core deposit growth was below threshold. Classified assets to total assets and non-single family loan originations were above target. Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer

Strategic Qualitative Objective

Key Results

Effective Leadership & Corporate Governance

Proactive COVID-19 response through increased communication with staff and engagement with borrowers. Effectively recruited two new board members.

Expense Reduction and Operational Efficiency

Continued efforts to reduce expenses and gain efficiencies through loan operations consolidation

Continuation of Core Business Focused on Profitable Growth

Successfully retained and hired key leadership positions and increased Company profitability

Audits and Compliance

No material findings from regulatory examinations or external or internal audits.

Mr. Mason received a payout of $271,079 for the corporate goals and therefore earned a total cash incentive under the Annual Incentive Plan equal to $353,579 or approximately 64.29% of salary.

In January 2016, the HRCG also approved a discretionary bonus for Mr. Mason for his substantial achievement of strategic initiatives in 2015 which will positively affect the Bank in 2016. These activities include acquisition integration work executed in early 2015 and growth in all business lines. Mr. Mason received a discretionary bonus of $150,000 for his performance in this regard.
2015 Performance Goals and Actual Results for Ms. Melba Bartels: Ms. Bartels serves as SeniorMichel, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of HomeStreet Inc. and the Bank.

Strategic Qualitative Objective

Key Results

Streamlining Financial Reporting Processes

Eliminated or reduced excessive reporting processes for management reporting, board reporting and external reporting. Consolidated and standardized monthly internal reporting schedules.

Evaluate the capabilities and effectiveness of the staffing of the Treasury, Finance and Accounting departments

Validated the staffing levels of these departments and implemented projects to be completed in 2021, which will provide enhancements and efficiency improvements.

Analysis & Execution of Stock Repurchases

Prepared analysis of stock repurchases in line with the Company’s capital management strategy and impact of COVID-19 and coordinated execution of share repurchase programs.

Oversight in Improvement of Company Efficiency and Profitability

Provided analytic support and additional oversight of the Company’s efficiency and profitability project.

COVID-19 Analysis

Evaluated facility usage and completed lease impairment analysis. Supported the analysis and computation of the allowance for credit losses in light of the impact of COVID-19.

Mr.van Amen, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer, Treasurer

Strategic Qualitative Objective

Key Results

Investment Portfolio Strategy

Portfolio outperformed benchmark in challenging environment

System Implementation

Successfully implemented four new systems

Hedging Effectiveness

Risk management results were exceeded

Investment in Community Development

Executed two low income housing tax credit programs

Audits and Compliance

No material audit or examination findings

46

Ms. Bartels 2015 bonus under the

2020 Annual Incentive Plan is alsoResults.

Based on the corporate results and the evaluation of individual performance achievements described above, the HRCG Committee approved the following Annual Incentive Plan incentive award payouts:

Non-Commissioned NEO

 

Corporate Component (% of Target Achieved)

 

Individual Component (% of Target Achieved)

 

Overall Award
(As a % of a Target Opportunity)

 

Actual
Payout
($)

Mark K. Mason(1)

 

137.2

%

 

140.0

%

 

137.8

%

 

$

800,730

John Michel(2)

 

137.2

%

 

120.0

%

 

128.6

%

 

$

335,650

Darrell van Amen(3)

 

137.2

%

 

120.0

%

 

128.6

%

 

$

203,940

____________

(1)      Mr. Mason was awarded 140% of target for his individual performance for having far exceeded his goals for the 2020 fiscal year, including financial performance results, management enhancement, risk management, employee retention, Board and Employee communication and total shareholder returns.

(2)      Mr. Michel was awarded 120% of target for his individual performance given his efforts in streamlining financial reporting, efficiency improvements, and COVID-19 analyses.

(3)      Mr. van Amen was awarded 120% of target for his individual performance given his work and leadership on outperforming portfolio management benchmarks, successful system implementations, and hedging effectiveness.

Commissioned NEOs Incentive Plan Arrangements

Commissioned NEOs are eligible for annual incentive awards under separate arrangements, which provide for payout opportunities based on hertheir respective business units’ performance objectives. Her bonus potential for 2015 was 50% of base salary with a maximum payout potential of 75% of base salary.




Ms. Bartels’ individual performance goals included enhancing accounting processes, establishing a more robust Investor Relations function, supporting strategic plan development and merger and acquisition analysis and integration activity. Individual goals for Ms. Bartels were not assigned specific weights in 2015. The HRCG determined that Ms. Bartels performed above target for her individual goals, for which she received a bonus of $121,875. Ms. Bartels was also awarded a bonus of $66,747 based on corporate goals, for a total bonus earned in 2015 of $188,622, representing approximately 58.04% of her base salary.

Ms. Bartels also received a one-time signing bonus of $75,000 upon joining the Company in August 2015. If she were to voluntarily terminate her employment with the Company or be terminated for cause prior to August 3, 2017, she would be required to repay a pro rata portion of that bonus based on the number of whole months that termination occurs prior to August 3, 2017 divided by 24.

2015 Performance Goals and Actual Results for Rose Marie David: Ms. David serves as Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director.

Ms. David’s incentive compensation plan consists of two components, volume and profitability, with each weighing 50% of the total incentive. The quarterlyresults.

Mr. Endresen’s monthly volume incentive is paid on achievement relative to five (5)three performance tiers and is calculated based on the aggregate value of achievement.loans originated in the Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Capital Segment, which we refer to as production volume. In 2020, Mr. Endresen’s incentive plan was revised to be a flat basis point payout on production volume, with a higher emphasis on Fannie Mae production. The lowest tierprofitability incentive is paid out 1.750 basis pointsquarterly at a fixed percentage of combined HomeStreet Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Capital Segment pre-tax income (post allocations). Although the incentive was earned entirely in 2020, 50% of each quarter’s incentive was withheld and paid at year-end. Additionally, the incentive is subject to a discount based on purchasethe ratio of Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Capital Segment classified loans to Commercial Real Estate and 1.000 basis points on refinanceCommercial Capital Segment total loans foras defined by the first $300 million of volume. The highest tier pays out on a declining basis at 1.000 basis point of purchase loans and .500 basis points on refinance loans for volume over $975,000,000. The quarterly profitability incentive paid 1.356%Credit Administration department of HomeStreet mortgage banking segment pre-tax income (post allocationsBank. This incentive discount is intended to encourage loan production consistent with the safety and excluding income and expense for Windermere Mortgage Services). Ms. Davidsoundness of HomeStreet Bank. Mr. Endresen received a total of $1,233,505$998,900 under the cash incentive plan in 2015.


2020.

Mr. Hand’s quarterly incentive is paid based on achievement of profitability and volume relative to four performance tiers. Incentive Plan Risk Managementis calculated by taking the origination business unit contribution margin, which is calculated by taking origination business unit revenue, minus direct expenses including operations, fulfillment and mortgage dedicated expenses, excluding corporate allocations and corporate taxes. The profitability margin tier is then determined and an override on the total volume for the quarter is multiplied by a basis points payout factor depending on the contribution margin tier achieved. A true-up calculation is completed to take into consideration any abnormally high or low quarterly results for the year. Additionally, Mr. Hand is eligible for a Quarterly Performance Bonus of up to 5% of base salary based on objectives such as file quality, cross sales efforts, servicing portfolio retention rates, return on equity and profitability metrics, among other things that may be related to, but not limited to, special projects, company initiatives, and implementation of compliance and regulatory changes. Achievement of objectives is reviewed and approved by CEO each quarter. Mr. Hand received a total of $765,322 under the cash incentive plan in 2020.

47

Performance Goals, Metrics and Results

The following table shows the performance measures, and 2020 results, for the commissioned NEOs:

Performance Measure

Target

Results

Commercial Real Estate – Mr. Endresen

Profitability(1)

$

53.67 million

$

56.30 million

Lending Volume(2)

$

1.73 billion

$

1.62 billion

Single Family Lending – Mr. Hand

Contribution Margin(3)

$

9.52 million

$

63.55 million

Lending Volume(4)

$

1.28 billion

$

2.39 billion

____________

(1)      Profitability is a percentage of the pre-tax income (after determining allocation of consolidated Company overhead expenses) of the Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Capital Business Segments.

(2)      Lending volume consists of a three-tiered basis point payout structure on loan volume paid monthly.

(3)      Contribution margin is calculated by taking origination business unit revenue, minus direct expenses including operations, fulfillment and mortgage dedicated expenses, excluding corporate allocations and corporate taxes.

(4)      Lending volume as a performance measure for single family lending is based on the contribution margin achieved by the unit combined with the actual volume of lending on a quarterly basis.

2020 Award Payouts

Based on the performance results described above, the following incentive awards were paid to the commissioned NEOs:

Name

 

Target
Payout
($)

 

Actual
Payout
($ Earned)

 

Actual
Payout
(% of Target)

William Endresen

 

$

999,933

 

$

998,900

 

99.9

%

Erik Hand(1)

 

 

370,020

 

 

765,322

 

206.8

%

____________

(1)      Mr. Hand’s actual payout was more than 100% of target due to significantly outperforming his performance plan with respect to profitability, lending volume and quarterly performance objectives.

Long-Term Incentives

Since 2014, our long-term incentive compensation has consisted of a combination of RSUs and PSUs that are granted under the 2014 Plan.

2020 Target Long-Term Incentive Award Grants.

In 2020, the Company granted long-term incentive awards consisting of 50% RSUs and 50% PSUs granted in March 2020, as approved by the HRCG Committee. The value of the equity awards determined by the HRCG Committee was based on a target value as a percentage of base salary. The HRCG Committee regularly reviews our incentive compensation arrangementsdetermines the target by reviewing peer group data and appropriate market data relevant to the banking industry and sets targets at levels intended to create a meaningful opportunity for all executives and non-executive employees who, either individually or as part of a group, have the ability to expose HomeStreet to material amounts of risk (“covered employees” under the interagency Guidancereward predicated on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies).increasing shareholder value. In addition to rigorous company-wide internal controls processes,considering competitive market data, the HRCG Committee takesalso considers an individual’s performance history, an individual’s potential for future advancement and promotions, the following measuresCEO’s recommendations for awards other than his own, and the value of existing vested and unvested outstanding equity awards. The relative weight given to ensure thateach of these factors varies among individuals at the HRCG Committee’s discretion.

48

The table below shows the grant date fair value of long-term incentive awards granted in 2020 to each of the NEOs:

 

RSUs

 

PSUs(1)

 

Total

NEO

 

Value
($)

 

Shares
(#)

 

Value
($)

 

Shares
(#)

 

$

 

Shares
(#)

Mark K. Mason

 

$

262,519

 

12,273

 

$

262,519

 

12,273

 

$

525,056

 

19,251

Mark R. Ruh(2)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

John Michel(3)

 

$

655,542

 

28,641

 

$

130,538

 

5,421

 

$

786,080

 

34,062

Darrell van Amen

 

$

79,314

 

3,708

 

$

79,314

 

3,708

 

$

158,628

 

7,416

William Endresen

 

$

93,752

 

4,383

 

$

93,752

 

4,383

 

$

187,505

 

8,766

Erik Hand

 

$

24,513

 

1,146

 

$

24,513

 

1,146

 

$

49,026

 

2,292

____________

(1)      PSUs are shown at target grant date fair value

(2)      Mr. Ruh was not awarded any long-term equity incentive compensation arrangements for covered employees do not encourage participantsin 2020 due to expose HomeStreet to unnecessary or excessive risks:

Annual HRCG Committee approval of incentive plan payouts;
HRCG Committee approval of any material changes to plan terms;
HRCG Committee oversight of annual incentive plan risk assessments;
Allowance for HRCG Committee discretion, if necessary, to address extraordinary events or circumstances;
Caps and/or deferral mechanisms to avoid “run-away” short-term incentive opportunities;
Balanced performance metrics, including safety and soundness goals;
Delivery ofhis expected departure from the Company.

(3)      Mr. Michel received a meaningful portion of executive compensationone-time new hire award in the form of RSUs in addition to the annual equity instruments that vestaward.

The PSUs are earned and vested based on achieving a specified company performance result and continued employment over multiple years, encouraging a natural interest in the long-term financial healththree-year performance period. In each case, the vesting of HomeStreet;

Clear communication and transparency in the establishment, administration and monitoring of incentive arrangements


“Clawback” Provisions: Each of HomeStreet’s incentive compensation arrangements includes provisionaward is also contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to the reduction or recovery of awards ifdate the HRCG Committee determines that materially inaccurate financial information was used in determining award payouts or if itcertifies the achievement of the performance goal for the relevant performance period.

The number of shares covered by RSUs was determined that the recipient’s activities exposed HomeStreet to imprudent risks. Should it be necessary, the HRCG Committee will determine the amount of any award that was overpaid as a result of inaccurate information and will send the participant a recovery notice specifying the overpayment amount and the terms for repayment.

In addition, Section 304 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 provides a basis to recover incentive awards in certain circumstances. If we are required to restate our financials due to noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements as a result of misconduct, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer must reimburse the Company for: (1) any bonus or other incentive or equity based compensation received during the 12 months following the first public issuance of the non-complying document, and (2) any profits the executive realized from sales of HomeStreet securities during that period.
Based on the findings from its ongoing monitoring and oversight efforts, the HRCG Committee has determined that none of our incentive compensation arrangements expose HomeStreet to unnecessary or excessive risks that could materially threatenby dividing the value of HomeStreet.
Equity Incentive Compensation
2014 Equity Incentive Plan. On May 29, 2014,listed above by the shareholders approved the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which authorizes the grant of nonqualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance stock units, stock bonus awards and cash incentive bonus awards. At the time the 2014 Plan was initially approved, the plan had a pool of 900,000 sharesclosing price of our common stock that could be issued under awards granted pursuant to the 2014 Plan. As of April 21, 2016, there were 220,056 shares remaining available for issuance under the 2014 Plan that were not subject to then-outstanding awards and an additional 307,522 shares subject to outstanding restricted stock awards and performance stock awards. The purpose of the 2014 Plan is to give us a competitive position in attracting, retaining and motivating officers, employees, directors and consultants and to provide a means whereby officers, employees, directors and consultants can acquire common stock or earn incentive compensation based on the grant date of March 28, 2020. The target number of shares covered by PSUs was determined by dividing the target value listed above by the closing price on the grant date of March 28, 2020.

The RSUs awarded annually as part of our common stock, thereby strengthening their commitment to HomeStreet and promoting an identity of interest with our shareholders. We do not believe that any element of the 2014 Plan encourages excessive or unnecessary risks to HomeStreet’s assets or reputation. The 2014 Plan is administered by the HRCG Committee.long-term

At present we issue restricted stock units and performance share units, although Ms. Bartels received a one-time grant of restricted stock awards in connection with her hiring in 2015. The restricted stock units have a time based vesting schedule where the units incentive plan vest incrementally in three equal installments on the one, twofirst, second and three yearthird anniversaries from the grant date. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability on the applicable vesting date.

A Closer Look at PSUs.

PSUs are designed to focus the NEOs on financial objectives that support the Company’s three-year strategic plan. The HRCG Committee sets performance share unitsmeasures at the beginning of each year along with threshold, target and maximum performance metrics. Payout opportunity ranges from 0% to 150% of target. PSUs are vestedearned and vest at the end of a three-year performance period.

In 2019, the HRCG Committee determined that a performance goal of total shareholder return going forward would better align the incentives tied to the PSUs with long-term shareholder value and will use a performance metric based on achievingrelative TSR, as described above, for PSU grants beginning in 2019 and going forward unless the Committee determines a specifiedchange is warranted.

For the 2019 – 2021 and the 2020 – 2022 performance periods, the HRCG Committee selected Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) as the sole performance metric to be measured by performance compared to the companies in the KRX (the “PSU peer group”). TSR is calculated as the change in share price from January 1, of the beginning of the three-year period to December 31 at the end of the three-year period using a 20-day trading average to take into consideration fluctuations in market, as adjusted for dividends paid during the Performance Period, assuming that all dividends are reinvested in shares on the date paid. The PSU peer group will consist of all companies included in the KRX at the end of the Performance Period (excluding the Company itself, if it happens to be a component company on that date). For results in between the 25th and 50th or 50th and 75th, there will be a straight-line interpolation calculation. Any achievement below the 25th percentile will result in 0% achievement.

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

Relative TSR performance

 

25th percentile

 

50th percentile

 

75th percentile

Payment as a % of target

 

50%

 

100%

 

150%

49

Vesting Provisions that Apply to All Equity Grants.    In addition to the vesting provisions described above, in the event of a change in control if the surviving entity does not assume the outstanding awards or place the participants in a similar plan with no diminution in value of awards, all then outstanding equity awards, including RSUs and PSUs, will vest upon the change in control, with PSUs vesting at target level. Additionally, if a participant is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within 12 months following such change in control, his or her outstanding equity awards will vest upon the termination date. For more information regarding such provisions and the retirement, death or disability provisions described above, please see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control”.

2018 – 2020 Performance Period Results and Payouts.    For the 2018 – 2020 performance measure. In 2015, the performanceperiod, PSUs were based on a single measure, wasAverage Return on AverageTangible Equity (“ROAE”ROTE”) as measured over the performance period of 12 fiscal quarters beginning January 1, 20152018 and ending December 31, 2017. Reaching2020. The performance results were calculated based on averaging the 12 fiscal quarter’s performance results. The following chart shows the threshold, target and maximum metrics for the 2018 – 2020 PSUs and performance for this period.

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Results

Average ROTE Performance

 

9.50%

 

11.82%

 

16.00%

 

8.15%

Payout as a % of Target

 

50%

 

100%

 

150%

 

—%

Because the threshold performance metric was not satisfied, NEOs did not receive any share units under the 2018 – 2020 performance period PSUs.

50

OTHER PRACTICES, POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

Clawback Provisions

Our short-term cash incentive plans include a clawback provision in the event of a material restatement of financial results. If the Board reasonably determines that an average ROAEexecutive engaged in knowing or intentionally fraudulent or illegal conduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement, the Board, based on available remedies, will seek recovery or forfeiture from that executive officer of all or a portion of his or her incentive compensation. The clawback amount would be determined by comparing the actual incentive received by the executive officer under the short-term incentive plan during the period prior to the restatement, with the amount that should have been earned had performance threshold equal to or less than 7% will result in 0 shares vesting atbeen measured on the endbasis of the Performance Period. Reaching an average ROAE performance target of 10% will result in 100%restated results. The difference would be recovered from the executive.

Hedging Policy

Our Insider Trading Policy expressly bars hedging, derivative, or any other speculative transactions involving the Company’s stock by all directors, officers, employees, and contractor of the target numberCompany, including its subsidiaries. Such prohibited transactions include hedging or derivative transactions, such as “cashless” collars, forward contracts, equity swaps or other similar or related transactions, or any short sale, “sale against the box,” or any equivalent transaction involving the Company’s stock. We also prohibit such persons from pledging Company stock to secure a loan, or from purchasing Company stock on margin (including in connection with exercising any Company stock options). In addition, we prohibit our executive officers, directors, and employees from purchasing or selling our securities while in possession of performance share units vesting. Reaching an average ROAE performance of greater thanmaterial, non-public information, or equalotherwise using such information for their personal benefit and maintain a quarterly black-out window where applicable individuals may not trade. We may, in appropriate circumstances, permit transactions pursuant to 12% will resulta blind trust or a pre-arranged trading program that complies with Rule 10b5-1 to take place during periods in 150%which the individual entering into the transaction may have material nonpublic information or during black-out periods.

Health and Welfare Benefits

All NEOs are provided with the same medical, dental, vision and life insurance programs as all other benefits-eligible employees of the target number of performance share units vesting.

Other Benefit Plans
Company on the same terms and conditions as applicable to these employees generally.

401(k) Savings Plan

Our 40l(k) Savings

All employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to make pre-tax contributions under the HomeStreet, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) also includes an account holding employer stock from our prior ESOP which merged into the 401(k) plan. Effective January 1, 2013, the employer matching structure and vesting qualified the 401(k) Plan as a “Safe Harbor Plan” under the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996. The waiting period for receiving the Company match was changed from six months to the pay period following an employee’s hire date and eligible compensation for the Company match changed to include all compensation (subject to IRS limits), with the exception of employee referral bonuses and vacation payout, at separation. Effective November 1, 2014 compensation for purposes of plan contributions will only include post-severance compensation if such



compensation is received by the employee in the paycheck immediately following termination. All employees, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to make pre-tax 401(k) Plan contributions and may be eligible to receive a discretionary matching contribution. An employer matching contribution may begin immediately after enrollment in the 401(k) Plan for employees who are at least 18 years of age and meet applicable service requirements. Currently, the companyCompany matches 100% on the first 3% and 50% on the next 2% of deferrals (maximum(up to a maximum of 4%). This matching contribution is taxable when the employee withdraws the money whether they havethe employee has contributed on a pre-taxpre-tax or post-taxpost-tax basis.
Executive Deferred Compensation
In 2004, we adopted a deferred compensation plan which allows designated executive officers to defer annually all or part of their incentive bonus and to receive an employer contribution equal to the additional employer contributions, if any, that would have been made to the 40l(k) Plan based on participants’ eligible compensation if certain IRS limitations on compensation and benefits did not apply. Interest earned on participant deferrals and employer contributions under the plan is equal to the average five-year daily treasury rate for the relevant quarter.
A participant or his or her beneficiary receives a distribution of his or her plan deferrals and Company contributions for a particular plan year upon the earliest of: (1) a future date specified by the participant, (2) the participant’s death, (3) the participant’s permanent disability, (4) the participant’s retirement on or after age 65 or (5) the participant’s termination of employment. The form of payment includes either a single lump- sum payment or annual installment payments over a period of years, but not more than ten years.
We suspended this plan in 2008 due to HomeStreet’s financial condition and as a result none of our Named Executive Officers were participants in this plan for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Health and Welfare Benefits
All Named Executive Officers are provided with the same medical, dental, vision and life insurance programs as all other benefits-eligible employees of HomeStreet on the same terms and conditions as applicable to these employees generally.

Perquisites and otherOther Personal Benefits

The Company does not have a formal perquisite policy or provide any supplemental executive retirement plans, although the HRCG Committee periodically reviews perquisites for our NEOs. We provide our Named Executive OfficersNEOs with benefits that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program and beneficial to the Company in attracting and retaining qualified executives. Perquisites includeAmong these are health club membershipmemberships and parking.parking as well as relocation benefits for Mr. Endresen, Mr. Ruh and Mr. Michel, all of whom transferred from offices in California to our headquarters in Seattle, Washington.

Risk Assessment

It is our belief that a substantial portion of an executive’s total compensation should be variable “at risk” compensation, meaning it is tied to the Company’s financial performance. However, because performance and sales-based incentives play a large role in our compensation programs, we strive to ensure that incentives do not result in actions that may conflict with the long-term interests of the Company, our shareholders and our customers. Therefore, the HRCG

51

Committee reviews an evaluation of all of our plans covered under the Sound Incentive Compensation Policies as well as those that have sales components (applicable to executives and employees below the executive level) for attributes that could cause excessive risk-taking or unethical sales practices. The HRCG Committee concluded that our programs and practices do not encourage excessive risk-taking nor do they encourage unethical sales practices that could potentially cause harm to our customers.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our most highly paid executive officers. While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to maintain flexibility in our approach to executive compensation in order to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives.

Executive Employment Agreements

We use employment agreements to attract and retain certain executives and the talent, skills, experience and expertise that they provide to HomeStreet,the Company, with a goal of protecting the Company and the shareholders and providing necessary stability and skilled leadership for the Company. In 2011, we entered intoAll NEOs have an executive employment agreement, with the exception of Mr. Mason. This agreement became effective upon liftingvan Amen and Mr. Hand.

Such employment agreements provide for the severance benefits summarized in the table below. Incentive amounts for severance purposes are determined as the greater of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s ceaseexecutive’s then-current target performance incentive or the performance incentive the executive received in the prior year. This also includes the actual termination payments made to Mr. Ruh in 2020 pursuant to his Resignation and desist order for HomeStreet Bank on March 26, 2012Release Agreement.

Name

Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason

Termination without cause or for Good Reason in Connection with a
Change in Control

Mark K. Mason

2x salary | 2x incentive

2.5x salary | 2.5x incentive

Mark R. Ruh(1)

0.5x salary

N/A

John Michel

2x salary | 2x incentive

2x salary | 2x incentive

Darrell van Amen

2x salary | 2x incentive

2x salary | 2x incentive

Erik Hand

1.5x salary | 1.5x incentive

1.5x salary | 1.5x incentive

William Endresen(2)

1.5x salary | 1.5x incentive

1.5x salary | 1.5x incentive

____________

(1)      Mr. Ruh separated from the Company in June 2020, at which time his employment contract terminated. He received a severance payment in connection with his separation from the Company equal to six months of base pay and was replaced witha payment equal to the cost of six months of health insurance benefits, as described in more detail below.

(2)      Mr. Endresen entered into a new agreement in March 2015 with an effective date of March 26, 2015. We entered into an executive employment agreement with Ms. Bartels effective upon her hire date of August 3, 2015, and refer to the current agreements with Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartels as the “2015 Employment Agreements”.

The 2015 Employment Agreements continue for a term of three years from the effective date, with an automatic renewal for additional one-year periods thereafter unless either party gives notice of termination 180 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term for Mr. Mason and 60 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term for Ms. Bartels.
Mr. Mason’s 2015Executive Employment Agreement with the Company on February 25, 2021 which provides for a base salary of not less than $500,000. Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreement provides for a base salary of not less than $325,000. In addition, the 2015 Employment Agreements require the Company to establish performance-based target bonuses under the Company’s bonus incentive plan (discussed above under Short Term Incentive Compensation − Performance-Based Annual Incentive


Plan), pursuant to which Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartels may receive, subject to completion of objectives, no less than 50% of salary (or such higher amount as the HRCG may approve), less required withholding and authorized deductions. The Board of Directors or the HRCG Committee and Mr. Mason are required to establish mutually acceptable performance objectives and related payout ratios no later than March 30 of each fiscal year. In addition, Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartels may be awarded additional stock options, restricted stock units or performance share units under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan or its successor.
In addition to the payment of earned and unpaid2x salary and 2x incentive compensation, unused vacation time, and unreimbursed business expenses,payments in the event of termination of employment within one year or during the 90 days immediately preceding a “change of control” by the Company other than for “cause” or by the executive for “good reason,” in conjunction with a mutual release agreement, Mr. Mason will receive an amount equal to the sum of: (1) two-and-one-half times his then current base salary, (2) an amount equal to two-and-one-half times the greater of his annual incentive payment earned by Mr. Mason in the year prior to termination or the contracted executive’s target incentive payment for the current year and (3) payment of health insurance premiums for Mr. Mason and his dependents for up to 18 months. In addition, all of Mr. Mason’s unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options will immediately vest and remain exercisable according to any stock option grant or plan. Performance share units will vest if the Committee certifies his attainment of the Performance Goal, which will be based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the Performance Period. In the event of termination as described above preceding a “change of control” Ms. Bartels will receive an amount equal to the sum of: (1) two times her then current base salary and (2) an amount equal to two times the greater of her annual incentive payment earned in the year prior to termination or the contracted executive’s target incentive payment for the current year. In addition, all of Ms. Bartels’s unvested equity grants will immediately vest and remain exercisable consistent with any such grant or applicable plan. Performance share units will vest if the Committee certifies her attainment of the Performance Goal, which will be based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the Performance Period.
In addition to the payment of accrued and unpaid salary and incentive compensation, unused vacation time and unreimbursed business expenses, in the event of ainvoluntary termination without cause or resignation for good reason, not involvingor a termination without cause or for good reason in connection with a change of control.

In addition, Mr. Mason, Mr. Michel and Mr. Endresen are each entitled to receive 18 months of continuing health insurance coverage for him and his dependents in the event of an involuntary termination without cause or resignation for good reason, regardless of whether a change in control in exchange for executing a release,occurs.

All employment agreements of the departingCompany with its executive will receive: (1) two times his or her then current base salary, (2) an amount equal to two times the greater of his or her annual incentive payment earnedofficers provide that in the year priorevent any payment or benefits to termination or his target incentive payment for the current year and (3) payment of health insurance premiums for Mr. Mason’s dependents for up to 18 months. In addition, Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s unvested equity grants will immediately vest and remain exercisable consistent with any such grant or applicable plan. Performance share units will vest if the Committee certifies the covered employee’s attainment of the Performance Goal, which will be based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the Performance Period.

In Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreements, termination for “Good Reason” is defined as (1) the assignmentprovided to the executive of any duties materially diminished from those in effect immediately prior to such assignment; (2) a change in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities which represents a material adverse change from those in effect immediately prior to such change; (3) material decrease inunder his annual Salary or deprivation of any benefit conferred on executives of similar or senior rank including, but not limited to, non-renewal of the relevant 2015 Employment Agreement without his or her prior written agreement; (4) relocation of the executive’s principal place of employment to a location that increases his or her commute from his or her primary residence by more than 30 miles one way; or (5) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach of the terms of such 2015 Employment Agreement by the Company.
To comply with Section 409A of the Code, the executive must give written notice of termination of employment within 60 days after the occurrence of the circumstances constituting Good Reason, and the Company will have 30 days to cure the circumstances constituting Good Reason, and the executive’s “separation from service” must occur no later than six months following the initial existence of the circumstances giving rise to Good Reason.
Payment shall be made in a lump sum on the earlier of the 90 days following the executive’s termination of employment or March 15 of the year following the year in which the termination occurred, provided that the


executive has executed and submitted a release of claims and the statutory period during which the executive is entitled to revoke the release of claims has expired before the payment date.
In addition to the prohibitions against solicitation of customers and employees and the diversion of corporate opportunities, Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreements also contain a six-month non-competition agreement which restricts certain competitive acts on behalf of another bank or thrift located in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, California or Hawaii or any other state where the Company has an office or branch and employs fifteen or more people.
Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreements further provide that if any payments received by the executive would constitute an “excess parachute payment”“parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the executive would be entitled to receive either (a) the full amount of such payment or benefit, taking into account the amount that would actually be received by the executive after application of all taxes and the excise tax imposed by Section 4999

52

of the Code, or (b) an amount reduced to the minimum extent necessary to avoid such payment or benefit being a “parachute payment”, depending on which alternative provided the executive the highest payment net of tax treatment. Executives would be responsible for any excise tax owing on any “parachute payments” paid under their employment agreements. None of HomeStreet’s employment agreements with any executive or any other employee contains any provision to provide for a gross up of excise tax payments under any circumstances, including a change in control.

Mr. Mason’s employment agreement, which was renewed in January 2018, provides that he will have an annual base salary of not less than $700,000 and will be eligible for an annual performance-based incentive bonus with a target award equal to 75% of his annual salary, provided that the Board or the HRCG Committee may set a lower or higher bonus amount based on performance and peer group data provided by Pearl Meyer. In the event of a termination without cause or termination by him (as those terms are defined in the agreement), Mr. Mason will receive the termination benefits described in the table above. The term of Mr. Mason’s employment agreement is six years from January 2018, with an automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term.

Mr. Ruh was subject to an employment agreement until his departure from the Company in June 2020 which provided that he would have a base salary of no less than $315,000 per year and will be eligible for a performance-based target incentive bonus of 45% of his annual salary with a maximum incentive bonus of 67.5% of annual salary. The agreement also provided for a one-time equity grant of restricted stock units valued at $100,000 effective on or around September 11, 2017, and an equity incentive award (granted 50% as RSUs and 50% PSUs) in an amount equal to 45% of Mr. Ruh’s annual salary, with such grant to be made in January 2018. The employment agreement also provided for relocation assistance to Mr. Ruh in the form of reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by Mr. Ruh in relocating from California to Washington State. Those reimbursements were earned pro rata over the first two years of the term of the agreement and were fully vested as of September 2019.

Subsequently, in connection with Mr. Ruh’s resignation from the Company, which was effective on June 5, 2020, we entered into a Resignation and Release Agreement with Mr. Ruh in February 2020 that provides, among other things, a bonus payment for 2019 performance in the amount of $135,888, an amount that was guaranteed to Mr. Ruh in his Resignation and Release Agreement and is calculated consistent with our standard executive bonus pay practices, and reimbursement of travel expenses and relocation assistance expenses pursuant to his current Relocation Assistance Agreement, up to the maximum amount of his relocation benefit provided in that agreement. In addition, on his separation date from the Company, Mr. Ruh received a severance payment of $160,650, which represents six months of his base salary, a lump-sum payment of $8,831 representing six months of the employer contribution for his current health care benefits, and immediate vesting of 1,361 RSUs that would otherwise vest on September 11, 2020. The Resignation and Release Agreement provided that had Mr. Ruh’s employment been terminated by the Company due to conduct by Mr. Ruh constituting a breach of the Resignation and Release Agreement, including the obligation to fully perform his assigned duties in a competent and professional manner through the Resignation Date, and such breach had not been not cured within ten (10) days, Mr. Ruh would not have be entitled to receive the severance payment, the lump-sum payment of certain health care benefits or the immediate vesting of his 1,361 RSUs. Mr. Ruh also agreed to provide certain releases to HomeStreet in exchange for these severance payments.

Mr. Michel’s employment agreement, which was entered into on May 11, 2020, provides for a base salary of no less than $435,000 per year and eligibility for a performance-based target incentive bonus of 60% of his annual salary with a maximum incentive bonus of 90% of annual salary. The agreement also provided for a sign-on bonus of $100,000, a one-time equity grant of restricted stock units valued at $525,000, and an equity incentive award (granted 50% as RSUs and 50% PSUs) in an amount equal to 60% of Mr. Michel’s base salary. The employment agreement also provided for relocation assistance to Mr. Michel in the form of reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by Mr. Michel in relocating from California to Washington State. Those reimbursements are earned pro rata over the first two years of the term of the agreement. The term of Mr. Michel’s employment agreement is three years from May 11, 2020, with an automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term.

53

Mr. Endresen’s employment agreement, which was renewed in January 2018, provides that he will have an annual base salary of not less than $315,000 and that he will be eligible for annual performance-based incentive bonuses pursuant to the Company’s incentive bonus compensation plans for executive officers in effect from time to time based on loan production volume, pre-tax, pre-incentive division income, credit quality and other targets that may be established from time to time by the Board or the HRCG Committee. Mr. Endresen is also eligible to participate in the Company’s standard benefits programs and may be awarded additional equity-based compensation. In the event of a termination without cause or termination by him individually(as those terms are defined in the agreement), Mr. Endresen will receive the termination benefits described in the table above. The term of Mr. Endresen’s employment agreement is three years from January 2018, with an automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term. Mr. Endresen also had an agreement with the Company for relocation assistance that provided for reimbursement of certain expenses related to his relocation from California to Washington State which were earned pro rata over the first two years of the term of the agreement; as of October 2019, those benefits were fully vested.

On July 29, 2020, we entered into an amendment to each of Mr. Mason, Mr. Michel and Mr. Endresen’s employment agreements. These amendments extend the term of Mr. Mason’s existing agreement to six years from the effective date of the original agreement, or January 25, 2024. In addition, each of the agreements were amended to remove payment of accrued vacation amounts upon termination consistent with the Company’s revised vacation policy for executives under which vacation dates will no longer accrue. All of the other terms and conditions of these agreements remain unchanged. On HomeStreet’s regularly scheduled payday after August 1, 2020, executives received an amount equal to their then accrued but unused vacation, less applicable withholdings and taxes.

On February 25, 2021, the Company entered into a new Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Endresen which replaces the prior employment agreement, as amended, as described above. The material terms of his employment agreement remain the same as they were under his prior agreement except that Mr. Endresen is now entitled to an annual base salary of not less than $390,000, and his termination benefits were increased to two times his salary and incentive pay upon involuntary termination without cause, resignation with good reason, or termination on change of control without cause or with good reason. The terms of this Mr. Endresen’s employment agreement is three years from February 25, 2021, with an automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term.

We believe that having in place reasonable and competitive post-employment compensation arrangements is essential to attracting and retaining highly qualified executive officers. Our post-employment compensation arrangements are designed to provide reasonable compensation to executive officers who leave the Company under certain circumstances to facilitate their transition to new employment. Further, we seek to mitigate any potential employer liability and avoid future disputes or litigation by requiring a departing executive officer to sign a separation and release agreement acceptable to us as a condition to receiving post-employment compensation payments or benefits.

In determining payment and benefit levels under the various circumstances covered by such post-employment compensation arrangements, the HRCG Committee has drawn a distinction between voluntary terminations of employment, terminations of employment for cause, and involuntary termination of employment in connection with or not involving a change in control of the Company. Payment in the latter circumstances has been deemed appropriate in light of the benefits to us described above, as well as the likelihood that the executive officer’s departure is due, at least in part, to circumstances not within his or her control.

In contrast, we believe that payments are generally not appropriate in the event of a voluntary resignation or termination of employment for cause because such events often reflect either an affirmative decision by the executive officer to end his or her relationship with us or inadequate performance.

54

HUMAN RESOURCES AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” to be “filed” with the SEC, or to be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulations S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

The HRCG Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management. Based on that review and those discussions, the HRCG Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

This report is submitted by the Company’s Human Resource and Corporate Governance Committee consisting of Douglas I. Smith (Chair), Sandra A. Cavanaugh, Jeffrey D. Green, James R. Mitchell, Jr. and Nancy D. Pellegrino.

55

2020 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officers during 2020, 2019 and 2018, to the extent required by SEC executive compensation disclosure rules.

Name and Principal Positions

 

Year

 

Salary(1) ($)

 

Bonus ($)(2)

 

Stock Awards ($)

 

Option Awards ($)

 

Non-Equity Incentive
Plan
Compensation(3)
($)

 

Change in Pension and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)

 

All Other Compensation(4)
($)

 

Total
($)

Mark K. Mason,
Chief Executive Officer

 

2020

 

738,462

 

 

525,039

 

 

800,730

 

 

94,008

 

2,158,239

2019

 

700,000

 

 

525,056

 

 

474,474

 

 

14,587

 

1,714,117

2018

 

700,000

 

 

525,080

 

 

417,143

 

 

18,849

 

1,661,072

Mark R. Ruh,
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer

 

2020

 

154,471

 

 

 

   

 

217,785

 

372,257

2019

 

319,846

 

 

144,635

 

 

135,888

 

 

129,868

 

730,237

2018

 

315,000

 

 

141,752

 

 

132,409

 

 

88,379

 

677,540

John Michel,
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer

 

2020

 

276,058

   

786,080

   

335,650

   

71,713

 

1,469,500

Darrell van Amen,
Executive Vice President,
Chief Investment Officer & Treasurer

 

2020

 

364,359

   

158,628

   

203,940

   

87,404

 

814,331

2019

 

343,927

 

 

155,571

 

 

155,470

 

 

14,747

 

669,715

2018

 

336,818

 

 

148,104

 

 

142,375

 

 

14,848

 

642,145

Erik Hand,
Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director

 

2020

 

253,108

   

49,026

   

765,322

   

41,678

 

1,109,134

William Endresen,
Executive Vice President, Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Capital President

 

2020

 

375,577

 

 

187,505

 

 

998,874

 

 

62,233

 

1,624,188

2019

 

315,000

 

 

157,616

 

 

851,120

 

 

11,977

 

1,335,714

2018

 

315,000

 

 

157,542

 

 

639,425

 

 

110,083

 

1,222,050

____________

(1)      The figures shown for salary represent amounts earned for the fiscal year, whether or not actually paid during such year.

(2)      Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair market value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For details of all assumptions made in such calculations, see Note 13 to our financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. The annual stock awards for 2020 comprised 50% RSUs and 50% PSUs for each executive officer receiving annual grants. The grant date for the 2020 RSUs and PSUs for all executive officers was March 28, 2020. The PSU awards listed above are based on reaching target performance, which was the probable achievement level at the time of grant. The value of the PSUs at their grant date if the Company reached maximum performance for 2020 would be $393,779 for Mr. Mason, $195,807 for Mr. Michel, $118,971 for Mr. van Amen, $36,769 for Mr. Hand, and $140,629 for Mr. Endresen. Mr. Ruh did not receive stock awards granted in 2020 given his planned departure in June. Mr. Michel received an additional one-time new hire equity grant in the form of RSUs with a grant date fair market value of $525,000.

(3)      Represents amounts earned for services rendered during the fiscal year, whether or not actually paid during such fiscal year under the Annual Incentive Plan.

(4)      The figure shown for each NEO for 2020 includes: (i) 401(k) matching contributions for Mr. Mason, Mr. Ruh, Mr. van Amen, Mr. Hand and Mr. Endresen of $11,400 each and for Mr. Michel $10,967; (ii) health club membership: Mr. Mason, $2,409, Mr. Ruh $1,533, and Mr. van Amen, $1,533; (iii) parking: for Mr. Mason, Mr. Michel, Mr. van Amen and Mr. Hand of $355 each and for Mr. Endresen $109; (iv) travel, housing and relocation expenses for Mr. Michel in connection with transferring his primary office from California to our headquarters in Seattle in the amount soof $42,720; (v) vacation payout as a result of vacation policy changing for executives resulting in $ 56,714 for Mr. Mason, $7,730 for Mr. Michel, $67,586 for Mr. van Amen, $28,248 for Mr. Hand and $43,270 for Mr. Endresen; and (vi) value of cash dividends credited to executives for unvested stock awards, which is payable at time of vesting resulting in $23,408 for Mr. Mason, $ 10,219 for Mr. Michel, $6,808 for Mr. van Amen, $1,953 for Mr. Hand and $7,486 for Mr. Endresen. For Mr. Ruh, $169,481 in severance payments is included in All Other Compensation.

56

2020 Grants of Plan Based Awards

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Threshold ($)

 

Target ($)

 

Maximum ($)

 

Threshold (#)(2)

 

Target (#)(2)

 

Maximum (#)(2)

 

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Stock Units (#)(3)

 

All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)

 

Exercise or Base Price of Option Award ($/Sh)

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
($)

Mark K. Mason

   

290,625

 

581,250

 

871,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,273

 

 

 

262,519

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

6,137

 

12,273

 

18,410

 

 

 

 

262,519

John Michel

   

130,500

 

261,000

 

391,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

5/11/20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,200

 

 

 

525,004

  

5/26/20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,421

 

 

 

130,538

  

5/26/20

 

 

 

 

2,711

 

5,421

 

8,132

 

 

 

 

130,538

Mark R. Ruh(4)

   

72,293

 

144,585

 

216,878

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Darrell van Amen

   

79,290

 

158,580

 

237,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,708

 

 

 

79,314

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

1,854

 

3,708

 

5,562

 

 

 

 

79,314

William Endresen

     

999,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,383

 

 

 

93,752

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

2,192

 

4,383

 

6,575

 

 

 

 

93,752

Erik Hand

   

370,020

 

902,747

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,146

 

 

 

24,513

  

3/28/20

 

 

 

 

573

 

1,146

 

1,719

 

 

 

 

24,513

____________

(1)      Grants to Mr. Mason, Mr. Michel and Mr. van Amen are under the Annual Incentive Plan. Please see “Annual Incentive Plan Awards (Short-Term Incentives)” above in CD&A for more information. Grants to Mr. Hand and Mr. Endresen are pursuant to their individual commission plans. For our commissioned NEOs, the annual cash incentives awards are entirely commission-based and do not have a threshold for payment or a cap on the maximum amount that his net payment willcan be paid under the award. The target amount disclosed in this table represents the amount each commissioned NEO was expected to receive under the Company’s 2020 strategic plan at the beginning of fiscal year 2020. Please see “Commissioned NEOs Incentive Plan Arrangements” above in CD&A for more information.

(2)      Represents grants of PSUs under the 2014 Plan. Awards vest following determination by the HRCG Committee of satisfaction of performance goals over a three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2022. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not be diminishedhaving been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to the date the HRCG Committee certifies the achievement of performance goals for the relevant performance period. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control in certain circumstances. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 48 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 60 of this Proxy Statement.

(3)      Represents grants of RSUs under the 2014 Plan. Awards vest ratably on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability, on the applicable vesting date. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control in certain circumstances. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 48 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 60 of this Proxy Statement.

(4)      Mr. Ruh was not included in any 2020 grants of equity awards as he had provided notice of his intent to resign from the Company prior to the grant date of March 28, 2020. Mr. Ruh’s departure from the Company in June 2020 make him ineligible to receive payment under the Annual Incentive Plan. These goals were set prior to the announcement of his departure.

57

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End

    

OPTION AWARDS

 

STOCK AWARDS

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options

 

Option Exercise Price ($)

 

Option Expiration Date

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#)(1),(2)

 

Market Value Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(3)

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4)

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
(3),(4)

Mark K. Mason

 

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,893

 

97,638

 

 

  

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

3/28/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,614

 

223,222

 

 

  

4/25/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,995

 

472,331

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,273

 

414,213

 

 

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

���

 

18,410

 

621,337

Mark R. Ruh

 

1/26/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

1/26/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

9/11/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

  

3/28/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

4/25/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

John Michel

 

5/11/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,480

 

522,450

 

 

  

5/26/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,421

 

182,958

 

 

  

5/26/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,132

 

274,455

William Endresen

 

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

868

 

29,295

 

 

  

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

3/28/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,986

 

67,027

 

 

  

4/25/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,200

 

141,750

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

   

147,926

 

 

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,575

 

221,906

Erik Hand

 

3/28/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

606

 

20,452

 

 

  

4/25/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,281

 

43,233

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,146

 

38,677

 

 

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,719

 

58,016

Darrell van Amen

 

2/10/2012

 

14,460

 

 

 

11.00

 

2/10/2022

 

 

 

 

  

9/7/2012

 

30,000

 

 

 

17.80

 

9/7/2022

 

 

 

 

  

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

816

 

27,540

 

 

  

1/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

0

 

 

  

3/28/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,960

 

66,150

 

 

  

4/25/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,146

 

139,927

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,708

 

125,145

 

 

  

3/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,562

 

187,717

____________

(1)      Includes RSU awards that vest ratably over three years from the date of grant. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability on the applicable vesting date. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control

58

____________

in certain circumstances. Amount shown reflects the number of RSUs that had not vested as of December 31, 2020. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 48 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 60 of this Proxy Statement.

(2)      Also includes PSU awards granted in January 2018. Amount shown reflects that no PSUs were earned as the performance goal for the three-year performance period covering fiscal years 2018-2020 was not met. Had the goal been met, such PSUs would not have been vested as of December 31, 2020, because the vesting of such PSUs was also contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to the date that the HRCG Committee certified the achievement of performance goals for the relevant performance period, which certification did not occur until March 2021. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 48 of this Proxy Statement.

(3)      Based on the December 31, 2020 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $33.75 per share.

(4)      Includes PSU awards granted 2019 and 2020. Amount shown reflects the target number of PSUs; each award has a maximum value equal to 150% of the target value. Vesting of PSUs is based on achievement of a performance goal that was based on TSR. For PSUs granted in 2019, the performance period covers fiscal years 2019-2021. For PSUs granted in 2020, the performance period covers fiscal years 2020-2022. In each case, the vesting of the award is also contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to the date the HRCG Committee certifies the achievement of performance goals for the relevant performance period. Amounts included in the table are based on maximum award amounts given the Company’s current performance trends; each award has a maximum value equal to 150% of the target value. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control in certain circumstances. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 48 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 60 of this Proxy Statement.

The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired from the vesting of RSUs and PSUs by each of the NEOs during fiscal year 2020 and the number of shares acquired on the exercise of stock options by NEOs during fiscal year 2020, where relevant. The table also presents the value realized upon such vesting, as calculated based on the closing price per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq on the vesting date.

2020 Stock Option Exercises and Stock Vested

  

Option Award

 

Stock Awards

Name

 

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
(#)

 

Value Realized on Exercise
($)

 

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
(#)

 

Value Realized on Vesting
($)

Mark K. Mason

 

 

 

12,975

 

$

357,878

Mark R. Ruh

 

 

 

3,610

 

$

98,294

Darrell van Amen

 

 

 

2,617

 

$

73,520

John Michel

 

 

 

7,740

 

$

257,742

William Endresen

 

 

 

2,604

 

$

72,917

Erik Hand

 

 

 

303

 

$

6,481

59

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Employment Agreements

As described above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as of December 31, 2020, we had entered into executive employment agreements, which provide for certain severance benefits in the event of a qualified termination with each of the NEOs other than Mr. van Amen and Mr. Hand.

Severance Provisions

The agreements provide for payment of severance amounts based on the executive’s annual salary and annual incentive plan award or, in the case of Mr. Endresen, commission-based incentive payments, of between one time and two times base salary and incentive payments. Mr. Mason’s, Mr. Michel’s and Mr. Endresen’s current employment agreement also provides for up to 18 months of continuing health insurance coverage for each such executive and with respect to Mr. Mason his dependents in the event his employment is terminated by the additional exciseCompany or the surviving entity without cause (or by him with good reason).

In February 2020, in connection with the announcement of the resignation of Mr. Ruh from the Company, we entered into a Resignation and Release Agreement with Mr. Ruh in February 2020 that provides, among other tax duethings, that he be paid a bonus payment for 2019 performance in the amount of $135,888, consistent with our standard executive bonus pay practices, and reimbursement of travel expenses and relocation assistance expenses pursuant to his current Relocation Assistance Agreement, up to the maximum amount of his relocation benefit provided in that agreement. In addition, on his separation date from the Company, Mr. Ruh received a severance payment of $160,650, which represents six months of his base salary, a lump-sum payment of $8,831 representing six months of the employer contribution for his then current health care benefits, and 1,361 Restricted Stock Units which vested on September 11, 2020. This agreement supersedes the severance provisions in Mr. Ruh’s employment agreement and all other agreements between Mr. Ruh and the Company.

Change in Control Severance Provision

Our NEO employment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits in the event (1) there is a change in control event (as defined in each executive’s agreement) and (2) the executive is either terminated by us or the successor company without cause (as defined in each executive’s agreement) or terminates his or her employment for good reason (as defined in each executive’s agreement) within 90 days prior to or 12 months following the change in control (as defined in each executive’s agreement). The agreements provide for payment of severance amounts based on the executive’s annual salary and annual incentive plan award or, in the case of Mr. Endresen and Mr. Hand, commission-based incentive payments, of between one-and-a-half times and two-and-a-half times base salary and incentive payments. The current employment agreements for each of Mr. Mason, Mr. Michel and Mr. Endresen also provides for up to 18 months of continuing health insurance coverage for such executive and his dependents in the event his employment is terminated by the Company or the surviving entity without cause (or by him with good reason) in connection with a change in control, although the employment agreement in place for Mr. Endresen as of December 31, 2020 did not have such a provision. Payments and benefits may be delayed six months following separation from service in connection with a change in control in order to comply with Section 409A of the Code.

Each NEO’s employment agreement contains a “better after-tax” provision, which provides that if any of the payments to the executive constitutes a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal RevenueCode, the payments will either be (i) reduced or (ii) provided in full to the executive, whichever results in the executive receiving the greater amount after taking into consideration the payment of all taxes, including the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code.

Additional Severance Benefit

In addition, in the event of a termination due to his total disability, Mr. Mason would receive 18 months of health insurance coverage for himself and his dependents.

60

Condition to Receiving Severance Benefits

As a condition to receiving any severance benefits under his or her employment agreement to which the executive would not otherwise be entitled, the executive must execute a release of all of his or her rights and claims relating to his or her employment and comply with certain post-termination restrictions, including, among other things, continuing to comply with the terms of his or her proprietary information and non-disclosure agreement, and for a period of six to 18 months, depending on the executive, and comply with certain non-solicitation and non-competition provisions that are set forth in each executive’s employment agreement.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

Beginning in 2013, Agreement

HomeStreet has entered into Change in Control Agreements with certain senior officers who do not have thisa change in control provision as part of an employment agreement.agreement, including Mr. van Amen. The Change in Control Agreement with Mr. van Amen provides an enhanced severance payment in certain circumstances: if within twelve (12)12 months following a change in control or 90 days prior to such change in control, the employee is terminated by the Company for any reason except for “Cause” (as defined in the agreement) or the employee resigns for “Good Reason” (as defined in the agreement), HomeStreet will pay a severance as follows:

Senior Executive Vice Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents who do not have other terms in their employment agreementsMr. van Amen will receive two (2) times theirhis current salary plus an amount equal to onetwo times theirhis last annual bonus or theirhis target incentive compensation for the current year, whichever is greater, provided a release agreement is signed at the time of termination.
Senior Vice Presidents

2014 Plan

In addition to the severance benefits included in the employment agreements, our 2014 Plan provides that in the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2014 Plan) if the surviving entity does not assume the outstanding awards granted under the 2014 Plan or place the participants in a similar plan with no diminution in value of awards, all then outstanding equity awards will receive one times their current salary plus an amountvest upon the change in control. In addition, the 2014 Plan provides that if a participant is terminated without cause (as defined in the 2014 Plan) or resigns for good reason (as defined in the 2014 Plan) within 12 months following such change in control, his or her outstanding equity awards will vest upon the termination date.

2014 Plan Award Agreements

Our standard form of RSU agreement provides that RSUs vest incrementally in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries from the grant date. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability on the applicable vesting date. If the NEO’s continuous service terminates as a result of the NEO’s death, disability, or retirement on or after age 65, a pro rata portion of the RSUs will vest as of the date of such termination equal to onethe number of full months from the grant date until the date of such event divided by 36, times their last annual bonusthe total number of RSUs granted, less the number of RSUs vested as of a previous anniversary date.

Our standard form of PSU agreement provides that PSUs are earned and vested based on achieving specified company performance over the three-year performance period. In each case, the vesting of the award is also contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or their target incentive compensationdisability prior to the date the HRCG Committee certifies the achievement of the performance goal for the current year, whichever is greater, providedrelevant performance period. If the NEO’s continuous service terminates during the performance period as a release agreement is signedresult of the NEO’s retirement on or after age 65, the PSUs will vest for that NEO at the end of the performance period in a pro rata portion of the PSUs subject to achievement of the performance goal as if the NEO’s continuous service had not terminated. The pro rata portion will be calculated by multiplying the PSUs thus vested by a fraction, the numerator of which equals the number of full months that the NEO was employed during the performance period and the denominator of which equals 36. If the NEO’s continuous service terminates during the performance period as a result of the NEO’s death or disability, the NEO will vest on a pro-rata basis to the extent PSUs would be vested based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the performance period. The pro-rata fraction will be calculated by multiplying then-vested PSUs by a fraction, the numerator of which equals the number of full months that the NEO was employed during the performance period and the denominator of which equals 36.

61

The tables below set forth the value of compensation and benefits that would become payable to each of the NEOs as of December 31, 2020 assuming (1) a change in control had occurred on that date and/or (2) the NEO experienced a qualifying termination of employment on that date, and in the case of payments made in connection with a change in control without considering the impact of the “better after-tax” provision. The applicable amounts are reported based upon the NEO’s compensation as of such date and based on the Company’s closing stock price of $34.00 on December 31, 2020. In the case of termination benefits, these benefits are in addition to what the NEO would receive in the event of any termination, and the benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as earned but unpaid salary, accrued but unused vacation consistent with the Company’s policy, and reimbursement of reasonable business expenses incurred for activities prior to such date of termination.

The actual amounts that would be paid in connection with such events can be determined only at the time of termination.

any such event. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon such an event, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than reported below. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, the Company’s stock price and the executive’s then current base salary.

The benefits payable assuming (1) the applicable NEO is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason on December 31, 2020 and (2) no change in control has occurred, as reported in the below table, are as follows:

•        Cash severance: cash severance amounts consist of (1) between one-and-one-half times and two-times annual base salary, depending on the executive, plus (2) between one time and two times the greater of the executive’s annual cash target incentive or the last annual cash incentive paid to the executive, depending on the executive; and

•        Benefits continuation: for Mr. Mason and Ms. BartelsMr. Michel, in each case the Company would also pay for health insurance benefits for the executive and for Mr. Mason his dependents for up to 18 months following termination. While Mr. Endresen’s current employment agreement also provides for this benefit, his employment agreement in place as of December 31, 2020 did not.

2020 Potential Payments upon Termination Outside of a Change in Control

Cash Severance

Name

 

Severance Payment

 

Highest
Bonus Amount

 

Benefit Payments

Mark K. Mason

 

$

1,550,000

 

$

1,162,500

 

$

32,470

Mark R. Ruh(1)

 

$

 

 

 

 

John Michel

 

 

870,000

 

 

522,000

 

 

14,266

Darrell van Amen(2)

 

$

 

$

 

$

Erik Hand(2)

 

 

 

 

 

$

William Endresen

 

$

562,500

 

$

1,499,900

 

$

____________

(1)      Mr. Ruh was not an employee of the Company at the end of 2020.

(2)      Mr. van Amen and Mr. Hand do not have an employment agreement and are not covered by theseentitled to severance benefits in this scenario.

The benefits payable assuming (1) the applicable NEO is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason on December 31, 2020, (2) a change in control has occurred and (3) the NEO’s RSUs and PSUs are assumed, as reported in the below table, are as follows:

•        Cash severance:    cash severance amounts consist of (1) between one-and-one-half times and two-and-one-half times annual base salary, depending on the executive, plus (2) between one-and-one-half times and two-and-one-half times the greater of the executive’s annual cash target incentive or the last annual cash incentive paid to the executive, depending on the executive;

•        Benefits continuation:    for each of Mr. Mason and Mr. Michel, the Company would also pay for health insurance benefits for the executive, as well as Mr. Mason’s dependents, for up to 18 months following termination; and

62

•        Equity awards:    each outstanding equity award under the 2014 Plan that remains subject to vesting provisions will vest in full, with PSUs vesting at target levels.

Cash Severance

 

Intrinsic Value of Accelerated
Awards if Awards are Assumed
(1)

Name

 

Severance Payment

 

Highest Bonus Amount

 

Benefits Payments

 

Vesting of RSUs

 

Vesting of PSUs

 

Total

Mark K. Mason

 

$

1,937,500

 

$

1,453,125

 

$

32,470

 

$

735,075

 

$

1,022,018

 

$

5,180,188

Mark R. Ruh(2)

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

John Michel

 

$

870,000

 

 

522,000

 

 

14,266

 

$

705,409

 

 

182,959

 

$

2,294,634

Darrell van Amen(3)

 

$

704,800

 

$

317,160

 

 

 

$

218,835

 

$

301,050

 

$

1,541,845

Erik Hand(3)

 

$

367,200

 

$

1,147,983

 

 

 

$

59,130

 

$

67,500

 

$

1,641,813

William Endresen

 

$

562,500

 

$

1,499,900

 

 

 

$

244,249

 

$

330,311

 

$

2,636,960

____________

(1)      Based on the December 31, 2020 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $33.75 per share. In the event awards granted under the 2014 Plan are assumed or replaced and the executive officer is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within 12 months of the change in control, such RSUs and PSUs will become immediately vested at the time of the date of termination. PSUs will vest at 100% of target levels.

(2)      Mr. Ruh was not an employee of the Company as of December 31, 2020.

(3)      While Mr. van Amen and Mr. Hand do not have an employment agreement, each would be paid a severance amount in this circumstance pursuant to their Change in Control AgreementsAgreement with the Company.

The benefits payable with respect to equity awards assuming a change in control occurred in December 31, 2020 where the surviving entity does not assume the outstanding awards or place the participants in a similar plan with no diminution in value of awards, as reported in the below table, are as follows:

•        Equity awards: each outstanding equity award under the 2014 Plan that remains subject to vesting provisions will vest in full, with PSUs vesting at target levels.

2020 Potential Payments upon a Change in Control Where Awards Are Not Assumed

  

Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Awards(1)

Name

 

Vesting of RSUs

 

Vesting of PSUs

 

Total

Mark K. Mason

 

$

735,075

 

$

1,022,018

 

$

1,757,093

Mark R. Ruh(2)

 

$

 

$

 

$

John Michel

 

$

705,409

 

 

182,959

 

 

888,368

Darrell van Amen

 

$

218,835

 

$

301,050

 

$

519,885

Erik Hand

 

$

59,130

 

$

67,500

 

$

126,630

William Endresen

 

$

244,249

 

$

330,311

 

$

574,560

____________

(1)      Based on December 31, 2020 closing market price of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq of $33.75 per share. Under the 2014 Plan, all RSUs and PSUs will become immediately vested at the time of a change in control if the acquiring company does not assume or replace such awards.

(2)      Mr. Ruh was not an employee of the Company as of December 31, 2020.

The benefits payable assuming the applicable NEO’s termination of employment on December 31, 2020 due to retirement, death or disability as reported in the below table are as follows:

•        Equity awards:    each outstanding equity award under the 2014 Plan that remains subject to vesting provisions will vest on a pro-rata basis (as described above), with PSUs vesting based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the performance period.

•        Benefits continuation:    for Mr. Mason, the Company would also pay for health insurance benefits for the executive and his dependents for up to 18 months upon termination due to death, disability or resignation for good reason as defined in his employment agreement.

63

2020 Potential Payments upon Retirement, Death or Disability

  

Vesting of RSUs(1)

 

Vesting of PSUs(1),(2)

 

Benefit Payment

Name

 

Retirement

 

Death

 

Disability

 

Retirement

 

Death

 

Disability

 

Disability

Mark K. Mason

 

 

 

$

735,075

 

$

735,075

 

 

$

1,022,018

 

$

1,022,018

 

$

32,470

Mark R. Ruh(3)

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

 

$

 

 

John Michel

 

 

 

$

705,409

 

$

705,409

 

 

$

182,959

 

$

182,959

 

 

Darrell van Amen

 

 

 

$

218,835

 

$

218,835

 

 

$

301,050

 

$

301,050

 

 

Erik Hand

 

 

 

$

59,130

 

$

59,130

 

 

$

67,500

 

$

67,500

 

 

William Endresen(4)

 

$

88,999

 

$

244,249

 

$

244,249

 

 

$

330,311

 

$

330,311

 

 

____________

(1)      Based on the December 31, 2020 closing market price of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq of $33.75 per share.

(2)      While PSUs vest pro rata based on actual performance during the full quarters that the NEO is employed during the performance period, the actual results cannot be determined until the HRCG certifies the achievement of the performance goal following the end of the relevant performance period. Therefore, PSUs reported in this table reflect the target level of performance goals for PSUs where the performance period ends December 31, 2019, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021.

(3)      Mr. Ruh was not an employee of the Company on December 31, 2020.

(4)      Pursuant to the award agreements for RSUs, if a grantee retires at or after the age of 65, a pro rata portion of the award shall vest as of the date of retirement equal to the number of full months from the grant date of the award until the retirement date divided by 36, times the total number of RSUs granted, less the number of units vested as of a previous anniversary date(s). Similarly, the award agreements for PSUs provide for vesting of a pro rata portion of the award at the end of the performance period of such award, subject to achievement of the performance goals as if the grantee had not retired, calculated by multiplying the PSUs thus vested by a fraction, the numerator of which equals the number of full months that the grantee was employed during the performance period and the denominator of which equals 36. Mr. Endresen would be eligible for this benefit based on his age if he were to have retired as of December 31, 2020.

Ratio of CEO Pay to Median Employee Pay

•        2020 annual total compensation of the median employee of HomeStreet Bank (excluding the CEO) was $68,112.99

•        2020 annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Mason, was $2,158,239

•        For 2020, the ratio of the annual compensation of Mr. Mason to the median annual total compensation of all our employees was 32 to 1

How We Identified the Median Employee

To identify the median Company employee, we identified our total employee population as of December 31, 2020, and, in accordance with SEC rules, excluded the CEO. We then used a consistently applied compensation measure, which in our case was 2020 Box 1 W-2 employee data to arrive at the median employee. This data included base pay, overtime, bonus payouts, incentives, commissions and the value of equity awards upon vesting. We did not annualize any compensation, apply any cost of living adjustments or exclude any employees.

As required by the SEC, after identifying our median employee, we calculated 2020 annual total compensation for our median employee using the same methodology that we used to determine Mr. Mason’s annual total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 56 of this Proxy Statement.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and our methodology described above.

64

PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview

As required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our shareholders to indicate their individual 2015 Employment Agreements have change-in-control provisions.

Human Resourcessupport for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and Corporate Governance Committees Report
Theour compensation philosophy, policies and practices for named executive officers described in this Proxy Statement. In accordance with the requirements of the SEC, we are providing you the opportunity, as a shareholder, to endorse or not endorse our executive pay program through the following non-binding resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related materials included in the proxy statement, is hereby approved.”

We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Our compensation program is designed to motivate our leaders to contribute to the achievement of our financial goals and to focus on long-term value creation for our shareholders. For more information, we invite you to consider the details of our executive compensation provided under “Executive Compensation” on page 35 of this Proxy Statement. That section provides you with information about the structure of our executive compensation and the objectives that our compensation program is intended to achieve.

We currently conduct annual advisory votes on named executive officer compensation, and we expect to conduct the next advisory vote at our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders.

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the HRCG Committee has reviewedvalues the informationopinions that our shareholders express in their votes and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

Vote Required and Board Recommendation

The proposal on the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote “FOR” of a majority of the shares present and voting on this matter.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

65

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

As more fully described in the executiveAudit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee, which consists solely of directors who satisfy applicable independence requirements of Nasdaq and SEC rules, is responsible for overseeing the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting process, financial statements and internal accounting controls.

The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the appointment, compensation section and hasoversight of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform quarterly reviews and an annual audit of the Company’s financial statements. Deloitte served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020 and conducted an audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2020.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:

•        Reviewed and discussed the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting with management and Deloitte;

•        Reviewed and discussed the Company’s critical accounting policies, practices, and estimates with management and Deloitte;

•        Reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management and Deloitte;

•        Discussed with Deloitte matters required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC;

•        Received and reviewed written communications from Deloitte as required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Ethics and Independence Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence), and discussed Deloitte’s independence with Deloitte; and

•        Received and reviewed written communications from Deloitte regarding their internal quality control procedures including the results of internal and peer reviews and PCAOB inspections.

Based on its review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the full Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 be included in the Company’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.

Scott M. Boggs, Chair

Jeffrey D. Green

James R. Mitchell, Jr.

Douglas I. Smith

Donald R. Voss

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” to be “filed” with the SEC, or subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Exchange Act.

66

PROPOSAL 3
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Overview

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. We have used Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm since January 1, 2013.

Shareholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte is not required by our Bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, the Board considers it desirable for shareholders to pass upon the selection of auditors as a matter of good corporate practice. We are submitting this proposal to our shareholders on an advisory (non-binding) basis, and the outcome of the vote will not be includedbinding on the Company. In the event that this appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm is not ratified by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the Proxy Statement.

This report is submitted bybest interests of the Company’s Human ResourceCompany and Corporate Governance Committee consistingits shareholders.

Representatives of Doug Smith (Chair)Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and Judd Kirk, Scott Boggs, Tim Chrismanwill be given the opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so and Tom King.

respond to appropriate questions.



Summary Compensation Table
Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table sets forth information regardingpresents fees billed for professional audit services and other services rendered to the compensation awardedCompany by Deloitte for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Amounts in this table are presented in thousands.

(in 000’s)

 

2020

 

2019

Audit Fees(1)

 

$

1,244

 

$

1,615

Audit-Related Fees(2)

 

 

 

 

35

Tax Fees(3)

 

 

87

 

 

60

All other(4)

 

 

2

 

 

37

Total

 

$

1,469

 

$

1,712

____________

(1)      Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and for the review of our quarterly financial statements, as well as services that generally only our independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably provide, including statutory audits and services rendered in connection with SEC filings.

(2)      Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements in connection with acquisition transactions completed by the Company during the reported fiscal year.

(3)       Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4)      All Other Fees consist of fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than the Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees. Includes $35,000 for services related to earnedbranch acquisitions in 2019.

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

It is the responsibility of HomeStreet’s Audit Committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy authorizing certain permissible audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor with subsequent reporting and oversight required by the Audit Committee. Permissible services, not pre-approved pursuant to this policy, require specific review and approval prior to the engagement by the Audit Committee, or a designated member. All services rendered by and fees paid to our Named Executive Officers.independent auditor are reported to and monitored quarterly by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of related audit services is compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. To assist the Audit Committee in its oversight responsibilities, the pre-approval policy identifies the three basic principles of independence with respect to services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm: (1) whether the services are consistent with applicable rules on

67


Name and Principal PositionsYear
Salary
(1)($)
Bonus
(2)($)
Stock Awards
(3)($)
Option Awards ($)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4)($)
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings($)
All Other Compensation (5)($)
Total
($)
Mark K. Mason
Chief Executive Officer
2014500,000
 ---300,073---169,758 ---17,606 987,437 
2015537,500
 500,000459,330---353,579 ---19,381 1,869,790 
Rose Marie David
Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending
Director
2014200,000
 ---40,046---723,533 ---15,338 978,917 
2015200,000
 ---50,133---1,233,505 ---14,070 1,497,708 
Melba Bartels
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (6)
2014---
 ------------ ------ --- 
2015135,417
 75,000269,204---188,622 ---72,249 740,492 

(1)The figures shown for salary represent amounts earned for the fiscal year, whether or not actually paid during such year.
(2)Mr. Mason received a bonus for his efforts with the Simplicity transaction in the amount of $350,000. Mr. Mason also received a discretionary award determined by the HRCG Committee in the amount of $150,000 for 2015 performance. Ms. Bartels received a sign-on bonus totaling $75,000.
(3)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair market value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For details of all assumptions made in such calculations, see Note 16 to our financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The stock awards for each of 2014 and 2015 comprised 50% Restricted Stock Units (RSU’s) and 50% Performance Share Units (PSU’s) for Mr. Mason and Ms. David.  The grant date for the 2014 RSUs and PSUs was May 29, 2014 and the grant date for the 2015 RSUs and PSUs was January 29, 2015. The PSU awards listed above are based on reaching target performance. The value of the PSU awards at grant date if the Company reached maximum performance for 2014 and 2015, respectively, would be $225,055 and $344,498 for Mr. Mason and $30,043 and $37,600 for Ms. David. Ms. Bartels stock award amount represents a Restricted Stock Award (RSA) granted on August 3, 2015 in connection with her hire by the Company.
(4)Represents amounts earned for services rendered during the fiscal year, whether or not actually paid during such fiscal year under the Annual Incentive Plan.
(5)The Named Executive Officers participate in certain group health, disability insurance and medical reimbursement plans, not disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, that are generally available to salaried employees and do not discriminate in scope, terms and operation. The figure shown for each Named Executive Officer for 2015 includes: (i) 401(k) matching contributions as follows: Mr. Mason, $13,400, Ms. David, $10,377, and Ms. Bartels, $3,254; (ii) health club membership for Mr. Mason of $2,148; (iii) parking as follows: Mr. Mason, $3,555, Ms. David $3,555, and Ms. Bartels $1,778; and (iv) life insurance premiums as follows: Mr. Mason, $258, Ms. David, $138, and Ms. Bartels, $46. Ms. Bartels also received a one-time benefit of $67,172 for relocation expenses. We provide certain non-cash perquisites and personal benefits to each named executive officer that do not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate for any individual, and are not included in the reported figures.
(6)Ms. Bartels was not an executive officer of HomeStreet at any point in 2014.


auditor independence; (2) whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the services in an effective and efficient manner, taking into consideration its familiarity with the Company’s business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors; and (3) whether the service might enhance the Company’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. The pre-approval policy also identifies the non-audit services the independent registered public accounting firm is prohibited from providing. All services provided by Deloitte in each of the last two fiscal years were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.




OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 
 OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS 
Name
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested 
Market Value Shares or Units
of Stock that
Have Not
Vested
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)(#)(1)
Mark K. Mason242,168    11.00 2/10/2022     30,826 669,232 
Rose Marie David        

     —
  7,282 158,092 
Melba Bartels        
  12,400 269,204 

(1)
Based on the December 31, 2015 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $21.71per share.


Engagement of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

In determining whether to engage or re-engage an audit firm, the Audit Committee annually considers, among other factors, the firm’s qualifications, performance and independence, including that of the lead partner, to determine whether the firm will serve in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. In deciding whether to re-engage Deloitte, the Audit Committee also reviewed the non-audit services provided by Deloitte, the fees the Company paid for these non-audit services, and whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm.

In addition, as part of the appointment process and in accordance with regulatory guidance and Deloitte’s policies regarding audit partner rotation requirements which limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may serve as a lead or concurring audit partner, the Audit Committee selected a new lead audit partner effective for fiscal year 2018 to replace the lead audit partner who had served in that capacity for the past five years. Prior to making this selection, the Audit Committee met with the candidate and discussed his background, experience and independence, and determined he was qualified to serve in the role of lead audit partner.

Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has retained Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021.

Vote Required and Board Recommendation

The proposal on the advisory (non-binding) vote to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote “FOR” of a majority of the shares present and voting on this matter.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER31, 2021.

68



CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

In addition to the compensation arrangements with directors and executive officers described in “Executive Compensation” above, the following is a description of each transaction since January 1, 2015,2020, and each proposed transaction in which:

•        we have been or are to be a participant;

•        the amount involved exceeds or will exceed $120,000; and

•        any of our directors, executive officers or beneficialbeneficial holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of or person sharing the household with any of these individuals (other than tenantsa tenant or employees)employee), had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Loan Transactions

Other than as described below, there have not been, nor are there any currently proposed, transactions or series of similar transactions meeting this criteria to which we have been or will be a party other than compensation arrangements, which are described where required under “Executive Compensation” on page 35 of this Proxy Statement and “Corporate Governance — Director Compensation” on page 29 of this Proxy Statement.

Loans

From time to time, theHomeStreet Bank makes loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders, and their related interests (collectively, “insiders”) in the ordinary course of business. These loans, other affiliatesthan loans to immediate family members not living in compliance withthe director, officer or principal shareholder’s home, are subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation O, issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. These loans arewhich requires that they be made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest ratesrate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparablenon-insiders. Regulation O generally defines a principal shareholder as a person that directly or indirectly or acting through or in concert with one or more other persons, owns, controls or has the power to vote more than 10% of any class of voting shares. While loans to immediate family members not living in the director, officer, or principal shareholder’s home are not subject to Regulation O, HomeStreet Bank’s Corporate Compliance department reviews these loans to ensure they meet the same qualifications listed above. All such loans originated in 2020 comply with persons not related to us,these provisions and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other features unfavorable to us.

Home Loans to Employees, Officers, and Directors Program

As a benefit of employment, HomeStreet Bank offers reduced closing costs to certain employees under the Home Loans to Employees, Officers, & Directors program. This program is offered to all permanent HomeStreet employees working 20 hours or more (“eligible employees”) for the financing of the employee’s primary or secondary residence. Employees may receive the closing cost credit on eligible home loan transactions once every 12 months. The amount of credit received depends upon the size and type of loan. Employee loan applications must meet HomeStreet Bank’s normal underwriting standards, and with the exception of discounted fees where applicable, the loan terms are the same as loans to members of the public. The same documentation requirements, including appraisal, credit report, and other third-party documentation, apply. The Home Loans to Employees, Officers, & Directors program is permissible under Regulation O, due to the fact that it is widely available to employees and does not give preference to the insider over other applicants.

In March 2021, HomeStreet Bank originated a loan to one of our executive officers, Jay Iseman, who is our Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer. The principal amount of the loan at origination was $420,000 with an interest rate of 2.5% reduced from 2.8125% upon payment of a market rate buydown fee, and a term of 30 years. Mr. Iseman received a discount on closing costs of 1.0% of the loan amount under the employee benefit described above. The purpose of this loan was to refinance the executive officer’s primary residence.

Under HomeStreet Bank’s Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures, if a loan to an insider or a related person has any terms or conditions not available to the general public, such as an employee discount, approval by the Audit Committee is required. If the loan amount is less than $1 million, the Chair of the Audit Committee has the authority to pre-approve the transaction. Prior to origination, the loan to Mr. Iseman described above was reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee Chair. With the exception of the employee discount, the loan were made in the

69

Indemnification

ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with non-related persons, and was determined not to involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other features unfavorable to the Company.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnificationindemnification agreements with eachall of theour current and former directors and certain of our current and former executive officers, of HomeStreet, Inc.including Mr. Mason, Mr. Michel and Mr. van Amen. Subject to certain limitations, these agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceedings against them as to which they could be indemnified. We also intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our future directors and executive officers.

Consulting Agreement with Chrisman & Company, Inc.
In 2015, HomeStreet entered into an agreement with Chrisman & Company, Inc. (“Chrisman & Company”) pursuant to which that entity was engaged to assist in the recruitment of our new chief financial officer. Timothy Chrisman, who is a director of the Company and a member of the Company’s HRCG Committee, is the controlling owner, president and chief executive officer of Chrisman & Company. It was the intention of both HomeStreet and Chrisman & Company that compensation under this contract be limited to $120,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Chrisman & Company on behalf of HomeStreet in connection with the search. However, as a result of an oversight by both parties, in addition to the provision requiring reimbursement of direct costs, the form of agreement used for this transaction initially included a provision calling for reimbursement of certain indirect expenses of Chrisman & Company in an amount equal to 10% of the total fees for services. As a result, we paid Chrisman & Company a total of $132,000 plus the reimbursement of direct costs in 2015. In early 2016, when the error was discovered, the agreement was reformed to match the terms originally agreed between the parties and Chrisman & Company reimbursed HomeStreet for the $12,000 paid in excess of the intended agreement. HomeStreet entered into a second agreement with Mr. Chrisman in April 2016 to assist in the recruitment of certain open positions at the Bank, with a maximum of $120,000 payable to Mr. Chrisman in 2016 under that agreement. The Board has considered the reformed agreement and the net payments made to Chrisman & Company under the reformed agreement as well as the 2016 agreement and determined that Mr. Chrisman remains an independent director of HomeStreet despite the initial overpayment of fees under the 2015 consulting agreement.

indemnified.

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

The

As described above, HomeStreet Bank is subject to the requirements of Regulation O, which places certain restrictions on loan transactions between theHomeStreet Bank and its directors, executive officers and principal shareholders (or any of their related interests). Regulation O generally defines a principal shareholder as a person that directly or indirectly, or acting through or in



concert with one or more other persons, owns, controls or has the power to vote more than 10% of any class of voting shares. TheHomeStreet Bank surveys Company and Bank directors and senior and executive officers each year to identify their related interests. The board of directorsBoard has adopted a policy for lending to our employees, directors and executive officers to ensure compliance with Regulation O loansO. Loans by theHomeStreet Bank to our employees, directors, and executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests that exceed $500,000 in aggregate require the approval of theHomeStreet Bank’s board of directors.
Prior to the completion of our initial public offering, in addition to the application of Regulation O to certain related-party transactions, we followed formal conflict of interest policies requiring the review and pre-approval of transactions with a related party by the chief executive officer and audit committee where the related party is a director or by the chairman, chief executive officer or general counsel for non-director employees. Following the completion of our initial public offering in February 2012, in

In accordance with the audit committee’sAudit Committee’s charter, the audit committee reviewsAudit Committee has reviewed and pre-approvespre-approved in writing any proposed related party transactions; however,transactions. However, certain types of transactions, including Regulation O Loans,certain loans made in the ordinary course of business, executive officer employment arrangements and director compensation required to be disclosed in our Proxy Statements,proxy statements, certain charitable contributions, transactions where all shareholders receive a proportional benefit and transactiontransactions entered into through a competitive bid prices, may be automatically deemed pre-approvedpre-approved as related party transactions under our Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures, a copy of which is available on our website at www.homestreet.com.www.homestreet.com. In the case of a loan requiring HomeStreet Bank board approval under Regulation O, however, review and approval by our Board of Directors is still required to approve such loan under Regulation O despite any such pre-approvalpre-approval as a related party transaction.

70


PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the beneficialbeneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 21, 2016,9, 2021, by:

•        each of theour directors and Named Executive Officers of HomeStreet, Inc.;

named executive officers;

•        all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and

•        each person known to us to be the beneficialbeneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our securities.

The amounts and percentage of our common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. The SEC has defined “beneficial” ownership of a security to mean, generally, the possession, including shared possession, directly or indirectly, of voting power or investment power. A shareholder is also deemed to be, as of any date, the beneficial owner of all securities that such shareholder has the right to acquire within 60 days after that date through (1) the exercise of any option, warrant or right, (2) the conversion of a security, (3) the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement or (4) the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no economic interest. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that each of the shareholders listed has sole voting and investment power with respect to their beneficially owned shares of our common stock.

The percentages reflect beneficial ownership as of April 21, 2016,9, 2021, as determined under Rule 13d-313d-3 under the Exchange Act and are based on 24,556,153.621,354,799.6 shares of our common stock outstanding as of that date. In addition, any options exercisable or RSU vesting within 60 days of April 21, 2016 will be9, 2021 are included in the beneficial ownership of the holder of such option, and the percentage ownership for that holder will beis calculated by adding the aggregate number of options exercisable or RSUs vesting within 60 days of April 21, 20169, 2021 to both the number of shares held by that specific shareholder and the total number of shares outstanding. Unless otherwise set forth in the following table, the address of the listed shareholders is c/o HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101.

Unless otherwise indicated, all ownership interests or voting power referenced herein, either in percentage terms or number of shares, in respect of the Company’s outstanding shares, have been calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership

 

Percent of
Class

Black Rock, Inc.(1)
55East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022

 

3,229,280

 

15.1

%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(2)
6300 Bee Cave Road
Building One
Austin, TX 78746

 

1,858,732

 

8.7

%

Russell Investment Management LLC(3)
1301 Second Ave., 18th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101

 

1,645,598

 

7.70

%

Vanguard Group(4)
PO Box 2600 V26
Valley Forge, PA 19482

 

1,422,572

 

6.7

%

Mark K. Mason(5)

 

158,818

 

*

 

Scott M. Boggs(6)

 

25,806.4

 

*

 

Sandra A. Cavanaugh

 

10,372

 

*

 

Jeffrey D. Green(7)

 

5,288.86

 

*

 

71




Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares of Common Stock Ownership Percentage
Black Rock, Inc. (1)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
 1,729,473
  7.05%
Wellington Management Group LLP (2)
c/o Wellington Management Company LLP
280 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02210
 1,631,716
  6.65%
Bruce W. Williams (3) 797,836.44
  3.25%
Mark K. Mason (4) 487,713.00
  1.97%
Douglas I. Smith (5) 62,335.00
  *
Timothy R. Chrisman (6) 49,178.00
  *
David A. Ederer (7) 34,448.60
  *
Rose Marie David (8) 19,281.00
  *
Scott M. Boggs (9) 16,430.40
  *
Thomas E. King (10) 15,381.00
  *
George “Judd” Kirk (11) 14,276.40
  *
Melba Bartels (12) 12,400.00
  *
Victor H. Indiek 7,669.57
  *
Donald R. Voss (13) 5,158.00
  *
All executive officers and directors as a group
(22 persons) (14)
 1,899,274.11
  7.59%
*less than 1.0%

(1)

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership

 

Percent of
Class

James R. Mitchell, Jr.

 

6,675

 

*

 

Mark R. Patterson(8)

 

177,650

 

*

 

Nancy D. Pellegrino(9)

 

4,552

 

*

 

Douglas I. Smith(11)

 

90,800

 

*

 

Donald R. Voss(10)

 

7,392

 

*

 

John Michel(12)

 

30,547

 

*

 

Mark R. Ruh(13)

 

10,301

 

*

 

Erik Hand

 

988

 

*

 

Bill Endresen(14)

 

7,764.95

 

*

 

Darrell van Amen(15)

 

72,368

 

*

 

All executive officers and directors as a group (18 persons)(16)

 

810,277.5

 

3.8

%

____________

*        less than 1.0%

(1)      Based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 26, 2021.

(2)      Based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021.

(3)      Based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2016.

(2)Based on Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2016.
(3)Includes 19,252.64 shares held through the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan participants have the authority to direct voting of shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan. Also includes (a) 20,147.2 shares held jointly with Gro A. Buer, Mr. William’s spouse; (b) 20,316 shares held as co-trustee with Ms. Buer for the Marina Sonja Williams Trust dated 12/25/95; (c) 135,000 shares held as sole trustee for Marina S. Williams Trust UA dated 6/27/13; (d) 150,076.8 shares held as executor of the estate of Walter B. Williams; (e) 150,073.6 shares held as executor of the estate of Marie W. Williams; (f) 1.2 shares held as the sole trustee of the Walter B. Williams Interim Trust; (g) 750.4 shares held as the sole trustee for the Andrew Alvaro Mullins-Williams Trust dated 11/29/05, and (h) 0.40 shares held individually by Gro A. Buer.
(4)Includes 237,164 shares held as co-trustee with Tracy Mason, Mr. Mason’s spouse, for the Mason Family Trust dated 2/16/99, options to purchase 242,168 shares of common stock, and 2,780 shares of common stock to be issued on May 29, 2016 upon the partial vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit granted to Mr. Mason on May 29, 2014.
(5)Includes 56,300 shares of common stock held jointly by Ann Smith, Mr. Smith’s spouse.
(6)Includes 12,500 shares owned indirectly through Chrisman & Company, Inc., in which Mr. Chrisman is the sole shareholder.
(7)Includes (a) 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for the Alicia Ruth Apple Trust dated 8/14/1992; (b) 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for Katelyn Jane Apple Trust dated 8/14/1992 and (c) 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for Lucas James Apple Trust dated 8/14/1992.
(8)Includes 3,000 shares held jointly with Don Balalke, Ms. David’s spouse, 3,165 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting on July 25, 2016, and 371 shares of common stock to be issued on May 29, 2016 upon the partial vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit granted to Ms. David on May 29, 2014.
(9)Includes 6,400 shares held jointly with Patricia Boggs, Mr. Boggs’ spouse.
(10)Includes 15,069 shares owned indirectly through the Thomas E. King Living Trust, of which he is the sole trustee and beneficiary.
(11)Includes 6,488.4 shares of common stock held jointly by Barbara Kirk, Mr. Kirk’s spouse.


(12)Represents shares issued pursuant to a restricted stock award subject to a right of forfeiture which lapses ratably over four years on August 3 of each of 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
(13)Includes 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for the Voss Family Trust.
(14)Includes an aggregate of (a) 7,273 shares of common stock to be issued on May 29, 2016 upon the partial vesting of Restricted Stock Units granted on May 29, 2014 (b) 461,167 shares issuable on exercise of options vested as of or within 60 days of April 21, 2016, and (c) 43,564.94 shares held through the 401(k) Plan. Participants in the Company’s 401(k) Plan have the authority to direct voting of shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan.



INFORMATION REGARDING EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plansobtained from S&P Global as of December 31, 2015 under2020.

(4)      Based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the HomeStreet, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“SEC on February 10, 2021.

(5)      Includes 300 shares held by Courtney Mason, Mr. Mason’s spouse.

(6)      Includes 7,900 shares held jointly with Patricia Boggs, Mr. Boggs’s spouse.

(7)      Includes 703.44 shares held by Tracy Green, Mr. Green’s spouse. Mr. Green disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to such shares except to the 2014 Plan”).

Plan Category
(a) Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
 
(b) Weighted
Average Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and
Rights
 
(c) Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
 
       
Plans approved by shareholders697,965 
(1) 
 $11.97
 
(2) 
682,058 
(3)(4) 
Plans not approved by shareholders (5)
15,600 
(5) 
 $0.97
  N/A  
Total713,565   $11.65
  682,058  

(1)Consists of 525,317 shares subject to option grants awarded pursuant to the HomeStreet, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (“the 2010 Plan”), 63,945 shares subject to Restricted Stock Units awarded under the 2014 Plan and 108,703 shares issuable under Performance Share Units awarded under the 2014 Plan, assuming maximum performance goals are met under such awards, resulting in the issuance of the maximum number of shares allowed under those awards.
(2)Shares issued on vesting of Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units under the 2014 Plan are done without payment by the participant of any additional consideration and therefore have been excluded from this calculation. The weighted average exercise price reflects only the exercise price of the options issued under the 2010 Plan that are still outstanding as of the date of this table.
(3)Consists of shares remaining available for issuance under the 2014 Plan.
(4)The 2010 Plan was terminated when the 2014 Plan was approved by our shareholders on May 29, 2014. While the terms of the 2010 Plan remain in effect for any awards issued under that plan that are still outstanding, new awards may not be granted under the 2010 Plan.
(5)Consists of retention equity awards granted in 2010 outside of the 2010 Plan but subject to its terms and conditions.


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
As more fully describedextent of any pecuniary interest he may have therein.

(8)      Includes 163,000 shares held by Mark and Michele Patterson Family Trust U/A dated August 23, 2010; Mr. Patterson and his spouse, Michele Patterson, are co-trustees and beneficiaries and share voting and investment power over the assets of the trust.

(9)      Includes 1,000 shares held by Pellegrino Advisory Services LLC, of which Ms. Pellegrino is the principal and beneficial owner.

(10)    Includes 61,300 shares of common stock held jointly by Ann Smith, Mr. Smith’s spouse.

(11)    Includes 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for the Voss Family Trust. Mr. Voss also holds Restricted Stock Units that represent a contingent right to receive 5,407 shares of the Company’s common stock to be delivered at the time Mr. Voss leaves the Board for any reason. Mr. Voss has not indicated any plans to leave the Board in the Audit Committee Charter,next 60 days so these RSUs are not included in his beneficial ownership.

(12)    Includes (a) 1,807 shares subject to restricted stock units that vest on May 26, 2021 and (b) 8,140 shares held by the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing HomeStreet’s accountingMichel Family Trust U/A DTD June 14, 2018, of which Mr. Michel and financial reporting processes, includinghis wife are the quarterly reviewsco-trustees and beneficiaries and share voting and investment control.

(13)    Shares held as of December 31, 2020.

(14)    Includes 532.957 shares held through the annual audit401(k) Plan as of HomeStreet’s consolidated financial statements by HomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firm. Deloitte & Touche, LLP served asthe last statement date of April 9, 2021. Participants in the Company’s independent401(k) Plan have the authority to direct voting of shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan.

(15)    Includes 2,000 shares owned by Jeannie van Amen, Mr. van Amen’s spouse. Mr. van Amen disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein.

(16)    Includes an aggregate of (a) 51,661 shares issuable on exercise of options vested as of or within 60 days of April 9, 2021, and (b) 2,934.2 shares held through the 401(k) Plan as of the most recent statement date of April 9, 2021. Participants in the Company’s 401(k) Plan have the authority to direct voting of shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered public accounting firmclass of our equity securities (“Reporting Persons”), to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities. Based solely on our review of reports filed with the SEC under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act or written representations from certain Reporting Persons, the Company believes that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152019 all Reporting Persons complied with all applicable requirements other than two Forms 4 that were filed late for the issuance of shares pursuant to settlement of restricted stock units for Mr. Kirk and has conductedMr. Ederer, and one Form 4 for certain purchases made by Mr. Green and his spouse in the auditopen market.

72

OTHER MATTERS

Participants in the Solicitation

Under applicable regulations of HomeStreet’s financial statements for 2015. The Sarbanes-Oxley Actthe SEC, each of 2002 requiresour directors and certain of our executive officers and other employees are “participants” in this proxy solicitation. For more information about our directors and executive officers, please see “Principal Shareholders” on page 71 of this Proxy Statement and “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” on page 10 of this Proxy Statement. Other than the Audit Committeepersons described in this Proxy Statement, no regular employees of the Company have been or are to be directly responsibleemployed to solicit shareholders in connection with this proxy solicitation. However, in the course of their regular duties, employees may be asked to perform clerical or ministerial tasks in furtherance of this solicitation.

Costs of Solicitation

We are required by law to convene an annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are elected. Because our shares are widely held, it would be impractical for our shareholders to meet physically in sufficient numbers to hold a meeting. Accordingly, the Company is soliciting proxies from our shareholders. The Company will bear the expenses of calling and holding the Annual Meeting and the solicitation of proxies on behalf of our Board with respect to the Annual Meeting. These costs will include, among other items, the expense of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing the proxy materials to shareholders of record and beneficial owners, and reimbursements paid to brokers, banks and other nominees for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy materials to shareholders and obtaining voting instructions from beneficial owners. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies on behalf of our Board, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone. We may also solicit proxies by email from shareholders who are our employees or who previously requested to receive proxy materials electronically. Our aggregate expenses related to our solicitation of proxies, excluding salaries and wages of our regular employees, are expected to be approximately $43,200, of which approximately $10,000 has been incurred as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

SEC rules permit us to deliver only one copy of our proxy materials to multiple shareholders of record who share the same address and have the same last name, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This delivery method, called “householding,” reduces our printing and mailing costs. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.

If you are a shareholder of record who currently receives a single copy of our proxy materials and wishes to receive a separate copy of our proxy materials or if you are currently receiving multiple copies of our proxy materials at the same address and wish to receive only a single copy, please write to the Secretary of the Company at HomeStreet, Inc. 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101 or call at (206) 389-7773.

Beneficial owners sharing an address who are currently receiving multiple copies of our proxy materials and wish to receive only a single copy in the future, or who currently receive a single copy and wish to receive separate copies in the future, should contact their bank, broker or other nominee to request that only a single copy or separate copies, as the case may be, be delivered to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.

Appraisal Rights

Holders of shares of common stock do not have appraisal rights under Washington law in connection with this proxy solicitation.

Shareholder List

A list of our shareholders as of the close of business on April 9, 2021 will be available for inspection during business hours for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting at our principal executive offices located at 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101. This list will also be accessible during the Annual Meeting through the meeting website www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021.

73

Shareholders Proposals and Director Nominations for the appointment, compensation2022 Annual Meeting

For inclusion in HomeStreet’s proxy materials: Shareholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in HomeStreet’s proxy statement and oversightfor consideration at the next annual meeting of the audit work of the independent registered public accounting firm. As part of fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:

reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management;
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters requiredshareholders by submitting such proposals in writing to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16 (Communication With Audit Committees);
received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence) of the PCAOB; and
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm that firm’s independence.
Based on its review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommendedour Corporate Secretary in a timely manner. In order to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 be included in the Company’s 2015proxy statement for the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K filedMeeting”), shareholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than December 22, 2021, and must otherwise comply with the SEC.
Submittedrequirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and our Bylaws.

To be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders: In addition, our Bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for shareholders who wish to present certain matters before an annual meeting of shareholders.

In general, nominations for the election of directors may be made (1) by or at the Audit Committeedirection of the Board, or (2) by a shareholder of Directorsthe Company entitled to vote at such meeting who has delivered written notice to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices within the Notice Period (as defined below), who was a shareholder at the time of HomeStreet, Inc.

Scott M. Boggs, Chair
Douglas I. Smith
Donald R. Voss
Bruce W. Williams



OTHER MATTERS
The Boardsuch notice and as of the Record Date, and whose notice is not aware of any business to come before the Annual Meeting other than those matters described in this Proxy Statement. However, if any other matters should properly come before the meeting, it is intended that proxies in the accompanying form will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgmentprocedures set forth in our Bylaws.

Our Bylaws also provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is specified in the notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board, (2) properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or (3) properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder who has delivered written notice to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices within the Notice Period (as defined below), who was a shareholder at the time of such notice and as of the Record Date, and whose notice complies with our Bylaws.

Except as otherwise provided by law, our Articles of Incorporation, or our Bylaws, the Chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made or proposed, as the case may be, in compliance with our Bylaws, and if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with our Bylaws, to declare that such proposal or nomination shall be disregarded.

The “Notice Period” is defined as that period not earlier than 5:00 pm Pacific Time on the 120th day and not later than 5:00 pm Pacific Time on the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. As a result, the Notice Period for the 2022 Annual Meeting will start on January 27, 2022 and end on February 26, 2022.

However, in the event that the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or 60 days after May 27, 2022, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than 5:00 pm Pacific Time on the 120th day prior to the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting and not later than 5:00 pm Pacific Time on the later of the 90th day prior to the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such 2022 Annual Meeting, the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company. In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting, or the announcement thereof, commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described in this paragraph.

If a shareholder who has notified the Company of his or her intention to appear in person or persons votingby a representative at the proxies.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
meeting to propose the business specified in the notice at an annual meeting of shareholders does not appear to present his or her proposal at such meeting, the Company need not present the proposal for vote at such meeting.

A copy of the full text of our Bylaws may be obtained by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by accessing our filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Availability of the Form 10-K and Other Filings

The Company’s 20152020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Annual Report”), including financialfinancial statements, is being mailed to shareholders with this Proxy Statement. Additional copies of the 20152020 Annual Report may be obtained without charge by writing to Investor Relations, HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101. This Proxy Statement, the 20152020 Annual Report and other proxy materials are also available on HomeStreet’sthe following cookies-free website that can be accessed anonymously at www.homestreet.com/proxy. In accordance with SEC rules, our proxy materials posted on this website do not contain any cookies or other tracking features.. The SEC maintains a website located at www.sec.gov that also contains this information. The information on HomeStreet’s website and the SEC’s website are not part of this Proxy Statement.

74







THE PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 (AND ANY AMENDMENT THERETO) ARE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE ON OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.HOMESTREET.COM

WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE ELECTRONICALLY OVER THE INTERNET OR BY CALLING THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER (FOR RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA) LISTED ON YOUR PROXY CARD. PLEASE HAVE YOUR PROXY CARD IN HAND WHEN GOING ONLINE OR CALLING. IF YOU AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY ELECTRONICALLY OVER THE INTERNET OR BY CALLING THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD. IF YOU CHOOSE TO AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY MAIL, SIMPLY COMPLETE YOUR PROXY CARD, AND THEN DATE, SIGN AND RETURN IT IN THE POSTAGE PRE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), Section 21E of the Exchange Act and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements relating to events or results that may occur in the future, including, but not limited to, the Company’s future costs of solicitation, record or meeting dates, compensation arrangements or structure, Board composition, future shareholder engagement and the Company’s strategy, and underlying assumptions of any of the foregoing are forward-looking statements.

When used in this Proxy Statement, terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should” or “will” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause us to fall short of our expectations or may cause us to deviate from our current plans, as expressed or implied by these statements. The known risks that could cause our results to differ, or may cause us to take actions that are not currently planned or expected, are described in the Company’s reports and filings with the SEC including, without limitation, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, under the heading Item 1A — “Risk Factors.” Unless required by law, the Company does not intend, and undertakes no obligation, to update or publicly release any revision to any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of the receipt of new information, the occurrence of subsequent events, the change of circumstance or otherwise. Each forward-looking statement contained in this Proxy Statement is specifically qualified in its entirety by the aforementioned factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

75


APPENDIX A

 

As of or for the
quarter ended

 

As of or for the year ended
December 31,

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

December 31,
2020

 

September 31,
2020

 

2020

 

2019

Core earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

 

$

27,598

 

 

$

26,349

 

 

$

79,990

 

 

$

40,720

 

Adjustments (tax effected)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring related charges

 

 

4,786

 

 

 

1,838

 

 

 

9,298

 

 

 

3,753

 

Contingent payout

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(446)

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

32,384

 

 

$

28,187

 

 

$

88,842

 

 

$

44,473

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average tangible equity (annualized)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average shareholders’ equity

 

$

717,666

 

 

$

716,899

 

 

$

706,160

 

 

$

694,903

 

Less: Average goodwill and other intangibles

 

 

(33,103

)

 

 

(33,447

)

 

 

(33,613

)

 

 

(34,245

)

Average tangible equity

 

$

684,563

 

 

$

683,452

 

 

$

672,547

 

 

$

660,658

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average tangible equity (annualized)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average tangible shareholders’ equity (per above)

 

$

684,563

 

 

$

683,452

 

 

$

672,547

 

 

$

660,658

 

Net income

 

 

27,598

 

 

 

26,349

 

 

 

79,990

 

 

 

17,512

 

Adjustments (tax effected)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization on core deposit
intangibles

 

 

267

 

 

 

266

 

 

 

1,082

 

 

 

1,367

 

Tangible income applicable to
shareholders

 

$

27,865

 

 

$

26,615

 

 

$

81,072

 

 

$

18,879

 

Ratio

 

 

16.2

%

 

 

15.5

%

 

 

12.1

%

 

 

2.9

%

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average tangible equity (annualized) – Core

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average shareholders’ equity

 

$

717,666

 

 

$

716,899

 

 

$

706,160

 

 

$

694,903

 

Less: Average goodwill and other intangibles

 

 

(33,103

)

 

 

(33,447

)

 

 

(33,613

)

 

 

(34,245

)

Average tangible shareholders’ equity

 

$

684,563

 

 

$

683,452

 

 

$

672,547

 

 

$

660,658

 

Core earnings per above

 

$

32,384

 

 

$

28,187

 

 

$

88,842

 

 

$

44,473

 

Amortization on core deposit intangibles

 

 

267

 

 

 

266

 

 

 

1,082

 

 

 

1,367

 

Tangible income applicable to
shareholders

 

$

32,651

 

 

$

28,453

 

 

$

89,924

 

 

$

45,840

 

Ratio

 

 

19.0

%

 

 

16.6

%

 

 

13.4

%

 

 

6.9

%

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Efficiency ratio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

64,770

 

 

$

58,057

 

 

$

235,663

 

 

$

215,614

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring related charges

 

 

(6,112

)

 

$

(2,357

)

 

 

(11,837

)

 

 

(4,489

)

Prepayment fee FHLB advances

 

 

(1,492

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,492

)

 

 

 

 

State of Washington taxes

 

 

(1,056

)

 

 

(677

)

 

 

(2,920

)

 

 

(1,782

)

Adjusted total

 

$

56,110

 

 

$

55,023

 

 

$

219,414

 

 

$

209,343

 

A-1


 

As of or for the
quarter ended

 

As of or for the year ended
December 31,

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

December 31,
2020

 

September 31,
2020

 

2020

 

2019

Total revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

56,048

 

 

$

55,684

 

 

$

208,662

 

 

$

189,390

 

Noninterest income

 

 

43,977

 

 

 

36,155

 

 

 

149,364

 

 

 

74,432

 

Adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent payout

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(566

)

 

 

 

Adjusted total

 

$

100,025

 

 

$

91,839

 

 

$

357,460

 

 

$

263,822

 

Ratio

 

 

56.1

%

 

 

59.9

%

 

 

61.4

%

 

 

79.4

%

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average assets
(annualized) – Core

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average assets

 

$

7,463,702

 

 

$

7,499,809

 

 

$

7,250,634

 

 

$

6,785,371

 

Core earnings (per above)

 

 

32,384

 

 

 

28,187

 

 

 

88,842

 

 

 

44,473

 

Ratio

 

 

1.73

%

 

 

1.50

%

 

 

1.23

%

 

 

0.66

%

A-2


BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS C/O HOMESTREET P.O. BOX 1342 BRENTWOOD, NY 11717 VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May26, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May24, 2021 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May26, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May24, 2021 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D52164-P55812 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. HOMESTREET, INC. SHAREHOLDERS MEETING

DRIVING INSTRUCTIONSThe Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees: Against For Withhold 1a. Scott Boggs 1b. Jeff Green 1c. James R. Mitchell, Jr. 1d. Mark Patterson 1e. Nancy D. Pellegrino 1f. Doug Smith The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 2. Approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. 3. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & DIRECTIONS FOR PARKING IN UNION SQUARE GARAGE


Meeting Location:

Hilton Seattle
1301 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-624-0500
From I-5 Southbound:
TakeTouche LLP as the Union Street exit, (exit 165b)Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December31, 2021. NOTE: Proxies are authorized in their discretion to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

Turn left

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The Form 10-K and Notice and Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com. HOMESTREET, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders May27, 2021 at 10:00 AM Pacific Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Mark K. Mason and Godfrey B. Evans, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on Seventh Avenue (first lightthe reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common stock of HOMESTREET, INC. that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the endAnnual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 10:00 AM, PDT on May27, 2021, via a live webcast accessible at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2021and any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all the Union Street exit ramp)

Seventh Avenue runs underpowers the Union Square buildings and the garage entrance is mid-block on the right side of the street.
From I-5 Northbound:
Take the Seneca Street exit, (exit 165), on the left side of the freeway.
Turn right onto Sixth Avenue (first light at the end of the Seneca Street exit ramp)
Turn right at University Street (undersigned would possess if present in person. This proxy, when properly executed, will be careful to stay left of the concrete divider that separates the two-lane access road around the Union Square complex from the freeway on-ramp)
University Street curves and becomes Seventh Avenue. Look for the sign indicating the parking garage entrance on the left side of the street.
Once You arevoted in the Garage:
Try to find parking in the WEST section of the garage, near the One Union Square elevator on any level. (One Union & Two Union Square share underground parking. WEST parking in the vicinity of a One Union Square elevatormanner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be closervoted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. Continued and to the Hilton.)
Look for overhead signs in the garage directing you to WEST or One Union Square elevators.
Take the elevator to the Lobby.
Once You Reach the Lobby:
Exit the elevator and take the down escalators directly ahead. At the bottom of the escalators you will see another elevatorbe signed on your left that will take you up to the Hilton Lobby. The meeting will be held in the Windward Room on the lobby level of the Hilton.reverse side

Parking Validation

Please bring your Union Square garage entrance ticket to the meeting and we will be happy to validate your parking before you leave. NOTE: We will not be validating Hilton parking.